Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T07BU00239
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/20/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | NPPO needs to review when located. |
| 03/20/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 3/20/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and finds that the grading plan is in compliance with the approved and stamped site plan for zoning review purposes. Zoning cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections due to possible changes that may have to be made based on Engineering or Landscape review comments.. 2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Zoning is willing to review and approve the grading plan over the counter if both Engineering and Landscape reviewers approve the grading plan. Please call for an appointment if this is the case. |
| 03/23/2007 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | T07BU00239 GRADING PLAN 1. Provide additional grades in the NW portion of the site. The object is to show that the 5-year volume is contained in the site and the 100-year flow is discharged at its historic location and the basin isn't overtopped. 2. Keynote #10 in the island near the SE corner of the building appears to be in error. 3. Clearly indicate where curb abuts the sidewalk next to the building. The linework suggests curb only along the eastern side but elevations indicate more curbing than that. I suggest putting Detail #2 from the Site Plan onto this Grading Plan to clearly indicate that pavement and sidewalk are flush in the area by the HC ramps. 4. Provide additional grades near eastern drive. Offsite flow into the site from Avenida De La Vista is a concern. 5. Provide a dimension from the south property line to the outlet pipe location (also the location of the cross-section on Sheet 2). Provide additional dimensioning locating the basin as no dimensions are shown on Grading Plan or Site Plan. 6. What is the pavement section? The geotechnical report lists several options. DRAINAGE REPORT A. Provide detailed basin maintenance checklist as requested in prior site plan review. The detailed checklist and schedule is to be part of the drainage report and not assigned to the owner as part of the grading plan. B. Provide 5-year and 100-year ponding elevations. See Grading Plan Comment #1 regarding the ponding elevations. SWPPP Indicate location of concrete wash-out on plan. No resubmittal required on SWPPP. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2007 | FSANCHE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/05/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |