Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T07BU00237
Parcel: 11803324A

Address:
2302 W HELTON LN

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T07BU00237
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/02/2007 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved DATE: August 2, 2007
SUBJECT: 2302 W HELTON LN Grading and Overlay Resubmittal Review
LOCATION: T14S, R13E, Section 21, Ward 1
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU00237, T07SA00036

Summary: Grading occurred at this site prior to obtaining a grading permit. This site falls with in the Hillside Development Zone Overlay area. A revised grading plan submittal and HDZ review was reviewed by Engineering Division at a meeting on 1AUG07 to review whether all comments had been addressed and to check for compliance with grading standards and HDZ Overlay Land Use Codes. Engineering Division recommends approval of the overlay and grading plan.

GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS:
The following 8 conditions apply to grading permit T07BU00237:
1) A copy of the Grading Plan and Grading Permit shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval.
2) Any revision to the Grading Plan may require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan and overlay review. Contact DSD Engineering to discuss changes in grading design.
3) Call for Pre-construction meeting, intermediate and final inspections. For a DSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (740-6970), or contact DSD Engineering at 837-4888, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html
4) If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact DSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required.
5) Interim stormwater controls in the form of straw bales or properly installed silt fence along south grading limits may be necessary to accommodate for reduction of sediment build-up or transport into wash area.
6) Separate building permit applications are required for any walls.
7) The permitee shall notify the DSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and all conditions of permit are completed. Prior to request for final grading inspection approval, all permanent erosion control improvements shall be installed and accepted by DSD including handplaced rip rap, rock, and/or established revegetation for all disturbed areas.
8) There shall be no disturbance outside of the disturbance/grading limits.

I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
08/17/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Add the following notes to the grading plan:

1. All proposed site work, including grading, will comply with Development Standard 9-04.0. LUC 2.8.1.8.B

2. Color. All exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, retaining walls, and accessory structures, except satellite dishes, shall be earth tone in color and will blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot or parcel. Satellite dishes may be black. White is not permitted

3. 3) Grubbing, grading, and clearing are to occur only within the areas identified on the grading plan and staked on the site or lot.

4. The portions of the site or lot to be left ungraded are to remain undisturbed and are not to be used for stockpiling of materials or excess fill, construction vehicle access, storage of vehicles during construction, or similar uses. To protect natural areas are designated on a site or lot, temporary fencing (per DS 2-06 Figure 1) will be installed. Fence installation will be approved by the Landscape inspector, or designee prior to any grubbing, grading, or clearing

5. Existing trees with four (4) inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti will be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites.

6. When retention of trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti will be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring revegetation, whenever possible.

7. All cut or fill slopes which are no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical (3:1) and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be revegetated in compliance with the following requirements.
§ All plants used in revegetation must be the same as the native vegetation
§ on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing.
§ Revegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants.
§ Desert trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading.
§ Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion.

8. A temporary watering system must be installed until the revegetation materials are established.
08/22/2007 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied August 22, 2007

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Michael St.Paul
Planning Technician

T07BU0023 Grading Plans for T07MH00014 & T07SA00036
6504 East 22nd Street

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. The site plan and the overlay for the HDZ must also be approved.

2. In addition, we could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with a site plan for this site approved by Zoning Review. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped Site Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. Also provide two copies of the approved HDZ Overlay.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/24/2007 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/24/2007 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed