Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU00237
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/03/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot not verify that the grading plan is in compliance with the approved site plan until the HDZ overlay application package is reviewed and approved. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped HDZ application package once the overlay has been approved. The site plan may have to be revised or additional notes may have to be added to the site plan before final approval of both the site and grading plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 03/08/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This project is currently under review for compliance with regulations in accordance with the DSD - HDZ Full Notice Procedure, Sec.23A-50 and 23A-51. (Ord. No. 9967, ยง2, 7/1/04). 2. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the HDZ case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 3. The Landscape / NPPO Section cannot approve the grading plan until all comments, concerns, and appropriate plan revisions have been addressed. |
| 05/07/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: 2302 W HELTON LN Grading and Overlay Review LOCATION: T14S, R13E, Section 21, Ward 1 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU00237, T07SA00036 Summary: Grading occurred at this site prior to obtaining a grading permit. This site falls with in the Hillside Development Zone Overlay area. A grading plan submittal and HDZ review was required to check for compliance with grading standards and HDZ Overlay Land Use Codes. Engineering Division has reviewed sheets for the grading plan and site plan, and does not recommend approval of the overlay and grading plan at this time. Address the following comments for the grading plan sheet: GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.11-01.4.C: Provide the following clarification/notations on the grading plan: a) Clarify sections to label slope grades on each constructed slope and type of erosion protection if provided. b) Label material for driveway. c) Provide a delineation for disturbed area / grading limits on plan view. d) Label any disturbance areas that will be revegetated or improved as noted. e) Label area outside of grading limits as "Natural Area to Remain Undisturbed". f) DS Sec.9-04.3.3.A: Address the following general grading note comments: i) Provide a grading note stating the square footage of disturbance / actual graded area. ii) Add a general note stating that materials and / or construction equipment may not be stockpiled or parked outside of grading limits at any time and that there shall be no disturbance or stockpiling outside of the approved limits as shown on the approved Grading Plan. iii) Add note that any further disturbance or any revision to the Grading Plan may require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact DSD Engineering at 837-4968 to discuss changes in grading design. iv) Add a grading note to state that all grading construction work shall conform to IBC Chapter 18, City of Tucson DS Sec.11-01, Hillside Development Zone requirements DS Sec.9-04.3, and any Soils Report for this site. v) Add a note that clarifies that separate building permit applications are required for all walls. vi) Add a note that all rip rapped slopes shall have handplaced stone with filter fabric. g) DS Sec.11-01.10.5: Address the following interceptor swale comments: i) Show an interceptor swale at top of cut slope. ii) Capacity for interceptors shall have a minimum of 30-in wide and 12-in deep, unless a larger capacity is necessary for the uphill contributing watershed. Show detail for this interceptor swale. iii) Provide call -out for erosion protection along interceptor swale and adjacent slope to reduce velocity / erosion potential from stormwater flow conditions. 2) For resubmittal, provide 4 copies of the revised grading plan sheets, 4 copies of the site plan, response letter, any other supporting documentation. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |