Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU00178
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | According to the approved tentative plat Case # S97-001 this subdivision is subject to Hillside Development Overlay criteria. Add the following notes to grading plan (Including heading): CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 9-04.0 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT SITE IMPROVEMENT Add the following notes to site plan (Including heading): A. Vegetation Retention. 1. Existing trees with four (4) inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti will be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. 2. When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti will be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring re-vegetation, whenever possible. B. Re-vegetation. All cut or fill slopes, which are no steeper than three (3:1) and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be re-vegetated in compliance with the following requirements. 1. All plants used in re-vegetation must be the same as the native vegetation on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing. 2. Re-vegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants. a. Native trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading. b. Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting or any other method approved by the Zoning Review Section at DSD. 1) Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; 2) Hydro-seeding; 3) Anchored mulches; or 4) Established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. C. A temporary watering system must be installed until the re-vegetation materials is established. D. NPPO pre permit inspection is required prior to grading inspection can be scheduled by calling IVR system and entering inspection code 09015 or calling Landscape Field Representative directly @ 791-5550 EXT 1140 |
| 03/03/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/03/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Please list the recordation dkt and pg number on the grading plan. Provide two copies of the recorded private easement and legal descriptions for the expansion of the roadway area necessary to construct the gated section of the private road. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure that the zoning comments have been addressed. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 03/21/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Rose Duarte-Pina, TetraTech SUBJECT: 1300 South Lost Starr Drive Gated Entrance Grading Review LOCATION: T14S, R13E, Section 20 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T07BU00178 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted grading review items: the copy of the entrance grading plans, Quail Hollow paving plans, other supporting documents, including the proposed access easement legal description and exhibit. The plans are denied until the following items are addressed. GRADING COMMENTS: 1) As-built drainage structure adjacent to proposed improvements indicate a 54-in CMP was installed where a 11-ftx4-ft con-arch was originally proposed on the Quail Hollow improvement plans. It is necessary to assure all weather access along Lost Starr Drive. The WSEL for 100-year jurisdictional flow at existing culvert crossing is necessary to determine all weather access. a) Provide copy of drainage calculations for existing 54-in RCP crossing. b) Label existing 54-in CMP invert elevations on sheet 2. c) Indicate water surface elevation at Lost Starr Drive on sheet 2. d) Delineate 100-year floodplain limits on sheet 2. e) Assure proposed elevations of the road pavement provide all-weather access for any over topping condition during 100-year event. f) A floodplain use permit application may be necessary if the project encroaches the 100-year floodplain. 2) Provide a copy of docket and page of Lost Starr Access Easement with the legal description and exhibit. 3) Add the following notes to the cover sheet: a) If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact DSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. b) The permitee shall notify the DSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit. 4) Provide additional pavement spot elevations around proposed medians to minimize potential ponding and assure positive drainage. 5) Contact Fire Department regarding application for fire box for proposed gate, enclosed with the plan package. Submit 4 copies of the revised grading plan with supporting documents including drainage statement, floodplain use permit application if applicable, and docket and page of new access easement. I can be reached at 791-5550, ext.2204 if you have questions. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/28/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |