Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T07BU00024
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | T07BU00024, Rita Ranch Commerce Center and Location Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Review Reviewed by Beverley J. Hester, P.E. January 12, 2007 (520) 791-5550 x 2205 Bev.Hester@tucsonaz.gov The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) requirements are found in The Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit For Discharge From Construction Activities to Waters of the United States Permit No. AZG2003-001 Part IV. The SWPPP submitted on January 5, 2007 does not meet the minimum requirements of the Construction General Permit and the City of Tucson Stormwater Ordinance. Please revise the SWPPP in accordance with the following comments. Please correct the AZPDES General Permit Requirements listed below. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Part IV.C.2. Describe the nature of the construction activity: 2. Part IV.C.2.a. Describe the project and its intended use after NOT is filed. 3. Part IV.C.2.c. Indicate the total area of site and estimate of total area expected to be disturbed (include off-site borrow and fill areas). The stated total area of the site is 30 acres for Phase I of the project and 2 acres for this portion of the project. Please show the boundaries of this project on Figure 4-1. 4. Part IV.C.2.d. Estimate the pre-construction and post-construction runoff coefficient and provide soil data and any existent data on the quality of the discharge applicable for this project only. 5. Part IV.C.2.e. Include and identify receiving waters in the general location map. SITE MAP 6. Part IV.C.3. Include a legible site map, complete-to-scale, of the entire site. Try to include the following on a single map, but use multiple maps, to the same scale, if needed. Please include the boundaries for this project. 7. Part IV.C.3.a. Identify on the map drainage patterns and estimated slopes after grading. 8. Part IV.C.3.b. Identify on the map areas of soil disturbance Identify on the map areas not to be disturbed. 9. Part IV.C.3.d. Identify on the map locations where stabilization practices are expected to occur. Please include out-falls and around the equipment area. 10. Part IV.C.3.g. Identify on the map locations where stormwater is discharged to a surface water (e.g. ephemeral waters or dry washes) and to MS4s. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS 11. Part IV.D.2.b. Describe the procedures for modifying or replacing BMPs if one is found to be ineffective or installed incorrectly or indicate where they can be found in the SWPPP. STABILIZATION EFFORTS 12. Part IV.D.4.a. Describe and identify interim and permanent stabilization practices for the site. Document where existing vegetation will be preserved. 13. Part IV.D.5. Describe structural practices used to divert flows from exposed soils, store flows and limit runoff and the discharge of pollutants from exposed areas to degree attainable. (Combination of sediment and erosion controls must be used). Include berms around the maintenance areas. 14. Part IV.D.5.b Describe where and what type of velocity dissipation devices will be used at discharge locations and along outfall channel. This site appears to have at least two outfall channels that have not been identified. 15. Part IV.D.6. Describe post-construction stormwater management measures. 16. If superchlorinated wastewaters will be generated, describe how they will be dechlorinated or held on site until chlorine levels have dissipated, unless used for firefighting. 17. Part IV.D.8.a. Describe measures to be used to prevent discharge of solid materials to waters of U.S. 18. Part IV.D.8.c. Describe the location and type of all construction and waste materials stored on site (Update SWPPP as necessary). 19. Part IV.D.8.e. Describe measures to be used to sufficiently stabilize soil at culvert locations. INSPECTIONS 20. Part IV.H.4. Describe all areas to be inspected including all disturbed areas of site, and areas used to store materials exposed to precipitation Describe inspection procedures how inspectors will look for evidence of, or potential for, pollutants entering drainage system. Include outfall channels, maintenance area, and storage areas. |
| 01/23/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading/disturbance. DS 2-15.3.4.A 2) Revise the native plant preservation plans match the phase proposed on the Private Paving, Grading, and Public Sewer plans. 3) Revise the landscape plan and native plant preservation plans to include the location and purpose of utility easements and other easements. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1 4) Include the proposed sewer construction between Lots 56 & 57 on the native plant preservation plans. 5) Include the landscape area on Lot 56 on the native plant preservation plans. 6) Fencing per DS 2-06 Figure 1 will be required at the limits of disturbance for the project. Revise the native plant preservation plans to indicate a temporary fence at the limits of disturbance. 7) Provide a landscape easement for the mitigation plantings shown on Lot 26. Clarify note regarding responsibility for maintenance. 8) Revise the grading plans to show the limits of grading/disturbance. 9) Revise note 12 on the landscape plan. 10) Landscape plan notes 4 and 13 conflict. Revise as necessary. 11) Revise the NPP calculations to reflect compliance with the mitigation requirements of LUC Table 3.8-I. Plants that are removed are subject to 2:1 mitigation requirements and transplants are subject to 1:1 mitigation. |
| 02/08/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 02/08/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. 5. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the approved and stamped development plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/13/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |