Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Permit Number - T06SA00279
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Approved | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 4, 2008 Jessie Byrd Novak Environmental, Inc. 4574 North 1st Avenue, Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: T06SA00279 Scenic Corridor and Environmental Resource Overlay Zones for Wootton Property Tentative Plat (S06-235) Dear Jessie: Your submittal of November 8, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Overlay zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (OCSD, DSD). ALTHOUGH OSCD HAS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL THE CONDITION MAY NOT BE REVIEWED BY THE CDRC MANAGER. ANOTHER SUBMITTAL IS REQUIRED. SAC REVIEW IS ALSO REQUIRED. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-3006 |
| 01/04/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Approved | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 4, 2008 Jessie Byrd Novak Environmental, Inc. 4574 North 1st Avenue, Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: T06SA00279 Scenic Corridor and Environmental Resource Overlay Zones for Wootton Property Tentative Plat (S06-235) Dear Jessie: Your walk thru submittal of July 30, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The conditions of approval are as follows: 1) closure of the public comment period, 2) approval by the DSD Director, and 3) revision of the plans per the on-line comments. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-3006 |
| 11/21/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Verification and approval of the floodplain limits is required for ERZ compliance. 2) Addition of notes to the NPPO & Mitigation plans regarding the required protective fencing per 9-06.2.5.A. |
| 12/04/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: T07SA00279 La Mariposa Subdivision Overlay Zone Review Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 30, 2007 DUE DATE: December 10, 2007 COMMENTS: The Zoning Review Section approves the overlay zone review for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\overlayzone\T06SA00279ozr.doc |
| 12/11/2007 | AAUDREY1 | CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | OCSD | Approv-Cond | 1. 9-06-2.5.B.3.a.1, requires mitigation for impacts to PRA for all plants of a certain size, without consideration of their viability. This differs from the NPPO, which takes plant viability into account when determining mitigation requirements. Per the ERR report provided by applicant, there are 55 trees and woody shrubs in PRA areas that will be impacted. Of these, 31 are listed as nonviable and no provisions for mitigation for their loss has been provided. Please revise mitigation plan to account for mitigation numbers and locations for all plants on the PRA inventory. |
| 12/28/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |