Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Permit Number - T06SA00112
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 01/12/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T06SA00112 Irvington West Estates Subdivision Special Application review for SCZ, ERZ and HDZ TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 12, 2007 DUE DATE: January 09, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The detail drawing depicting the scenic view sheds is a bit confusing. The calculation used to arrive at the correct view shed dimensions is correct. The detail is depicted with 3 different distance for sect "A". The distance should be listed as 75 feet. Please revise as required. (Previous Comment) Draw, dimension, and label the view sheds on the appropriate tentative plat sheets. 2. The following notes must be added to sheet T-2 or to an additional sheet that is specific to the Scenic Corridor Overlay requirements. A. Please add the appropriate following notes to the tentative, development plat. a) Please revise the note 'a' and 'f'. The case number listed on the plan was an old case number that I used an example for the drafter to add to the notes. Please replace the case number SCZ-99-05 as listed to T06SA000112 in bot h notes. (Previous Comment) Individual SCZ case not required for each lot, but site plans, elevations, and colors must be submitted for each lot for review of compliance to Scenic Corridor Zone case number SCZ 99-05 for height, colors, and setbacks. This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. The Special application case number is T06SA00112.The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date (add the date of approval), without conditions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\specialapps\T06SA00112ca.doc |
| 02/07/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator FOR: Corrales Engineering SUBJECT: Irvington West Estates Subdivision S06-087 Overlay Review resubmittal REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06SA00112 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Landscape documents, and response letter were received and reviewed for Overlay conformance. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat and Overlay purposes only. Development Services Department Engineering Division has completed the review of the received items and maintains the following overlay recommendations: Engineering recommends approval for the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) Overlay. Engineering does not recommend approval at this time for the Scenic Corridor (SCZ) Overlay. Engineering does not recommend approval for the Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) Overlay. SCZ and HDZ OVERLAY COMMENTS: 1) Land Use Code Section (LUC) 2.8.1.2.C: This project is within the Scenic Corridor Zone where drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state, and slopes no steeper than 3:1(H:V) are acceptable. Natural state includes both vegetative and topographic characteristics of the existing terrain. Thus, grading for drainage improvements must be designed in such a way to maintain the topographic consistency of the area. Specifically, the drainage needs to be maintained in natural state. Basin 1 section B-B on sheet T6 indicates 3:1(H:V) side slopes yet plan views on sheet T3, T5, and T6. Revise planviews to show compliance with LUC SCZ maximum slope grade. 2) DS Sec.9-04.2.1.G: On sheet 9, provide general lot and street layout to see where 15% slopes are located. 3) DS Sec.11-01.9.3: Any changes to layout due to Missouri right-of-way dedication should be reflected on the conceptual grading area adjacent to basin 5. Show that runout for the slopes provides sufficient area to meet grading requirements. Slopes must conform to DS Sec.9-04.3 & 11-01. 4) Per D.S. 2-03.2.4.K, LUC Sec.2.8.1: Per Hillside Development Zone, development for these projects should utilize construction methods which ensure slope stabilization and minimize soil erosion. In order to provide sufficient runout that allows for SCZ requirement of 3:1(H:V) within the 400' SCZ, allows for any dedicated right-of-way to Missouri Drive, and to comply with required slope setback and geotechnical setbacks, the slope along the south side of basin 5 would need more area to accommodate this basin. Specifically, redesign basins to provide acceptable basin slope grades, and setbacks, per recommendations of the geotechnical report that has not yet been submitted. Geotechnical report should provide information for maximum basin slope grades, basin setbacks, and basin infiltration test results. However, no slopes steeper than 3:1(H:V) are allowable in the Scenic Corridor viewshed per LUC Sec.3.7.5.2.E. Revise Basin 1 side slopes per SCZ and geotechnical report. Submit revised Tentative Plat and response letter. The next submittal should address all the above items. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 02/09/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 8, 2007 Charles Corrales Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation 108 West St Mary's Road, Building #1 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: T06SA00112 Scenic Corridor, Hillside Development, and Environmental Resource Overlay Zones for Irvington West Estates Subdivision (S06-087) Dear Charles: Your submittal of December 8, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Overlay zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD). Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 622-2554 |
| 12/19/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the tentative plat submittal as requested in review#S06-087. 2) Revise the grading limits on the native plant preservation plan to exclude grading in the 30' scenic route buffer area, except for areas where disturbance is permitted. LUC 3.7.5.2.D 3) The SCZ requirements include a provision that requires drainage-ways be preserved in a natural state. The drainage design may be affected. The bleed pipe that crosses the scenic route buffer area is subject to approval by the City Engineer. LUC 2.8.2.6.C 4) Within the Scenic Corridor Zone exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length. Revise the basin at common area J to comply. |