Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Permit Number - T06SA00056
Review Name: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REV
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the application at this time. Additional information is required. 1) Revise the landscape plan show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B 2) Revise the native plant preservation plans to identify the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 3) Revise the landscape plan to identify any existing vegetation to remain within 30' scenic route buffer area. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e Within the 30' scenic route buffer area, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible per DS 2-06.7.1.B. I Provide analysis and explanation for areas disturbed by construction. 4) Any landscape area visible from the Scenic Corridor Zone is to be landscaped using native plant material indigenous to the site or plants selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, Development Standard 9-06.0 per DS 2-06.7.1.C. Revise the landscape plan to comply. An object is considered visible whenever it can be seen, not blocked by an intervening structure or terrain, from four (4) feet above the natural grade at the future right-of-way line along the parcel. LUC 6.2.22 Portions of the site contain visible trees that are not on the approved plant list. 5) Identify the dashed line shown on the landscape plan in the scenic route buffer area. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 03/24/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 24, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Center for Neurosciences Scenic Corridor Review . The activity number is T06SA00056. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on February 22nd, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval at this time. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, NPPO PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Provide a grading plan with the next SCZ submittal. Delineate the limits of grading and cut and fill areas. Within the SCZ, exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length. LUC 3.7.5.2.E. 2. Are any proposed utilities located within the ROW? Show on the development plan and the grading plan locations of proposed utility lines. All new utilities must be located underground within the property limits and along the ROW when a project is subject the SCZ requirements. Add a general note to the development stating, "All new utilities must be located underground within the property limits and along the ROW." Address all requested information in the response letter and on the plans. LUC 2.8.2.9. |
| 04/27/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T06SA00056 Center for Neurosciences SCZ Overlay TRANSMITTAL: 04/27/06 DUE DATE: 3/22/06 COMMENTS: 1. See LUC Sec. 2.8.2 regarding the following comments. 2. Include in 30 foot buffer label the notation "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 3. Indicate on the plan graphically and by calculations compliance with LUC Sec. 2.8.2.6 in regards to view corridors. The property as submitted has in excess of 200' of frontage along River Rd which is a MS&R thus requiring view corridors with a combined width of at least 20% of the frontage. 4. Add the 400-foot SCZ corridor boundary to the development plan. 5. If a color or construction materials palette is proposed , add both matrix tables, which includes the proposed exterior color name, number and manufacturer, proposed roof material type and color, required screening wall materials and color, etc. 6. Please add the following notes to the development plan. a) This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. The Special application case number is T06SA00056.The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date _________, without conditions. b) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of River Road, not to exceed 24 feet for residential development and 30 feet for commercial development from design grade. c) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, drives, private yards, and structural improvements. All viable vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti will be preserved or relocated on the site per the Native Plant and Preservation Ordinance. d) Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. e) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along River Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is revegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D f) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from River Road will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. Colors are as follows: (list approved colors from T06SA00056 case). g) Fencing and freestanding walls facing River Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. h) All areas between the MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation. i) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from River Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. j) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than 1-foot rise or fall over a 3-foot length. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\scz\T06CM00056scz.doc |
| 04/28/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 28, 2006 Richard Cordova DOWL Engineering 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: T06SA00056 Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone for Center for Neurosciences (D05-0038) Dear Richard: Your submittal of February 22, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD). Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 |