Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00065
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Completed | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Completed | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Completed | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Completed | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Completed | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Completed | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/02/2007 | ASHOFFS1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Completed | Please submit Utility Clearance Letter from Tucson Water and Pima County Wastewater. |
| 07/12/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | July 12, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06PI00065 PROJECT NAME: TSN Mountain Kingdom Hall PROJECT ADDRESS: 4729 N Silverbell Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the PIA Plan. Therefore address the attached comments reflected on the red-lines provided (located on Sheet 3 of 3). Modifications to the plans shall be reflected on the Mylars. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/24/2007 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | NPPO not addressed. No plan submitted. |
| 07/25/2007 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 2 - It is assumed that the concrete header called out at the returns will be at least from the BCR to the ECR. 2. There will be no landscaping added or moved in the right of way that will be the City's to maintain. |
| 07/25/2007 | Blanca Espino | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | PIA Plan 1. Please include a detail letter of explanation with the next submittal indicating where and how revisions were made. Single word sentences are unacceptable. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Sheet 1, remove and relocate the PIA # T06PI00065 from the Plan title/heading to just above the Title box. See redlines. Correct and revise. 3. Sheet 1, Title Block; Correct as per redlines. 4. Sheet 2, shows a retention area to accept the street discharge. This was not proposed on the approved development plan. Correct and revise to reflect approved development plan. 5. Sheet 2, Deceleration lane's vertical curbing can be removed and replaced with thickened edge to accept the street runoff. Concrete headers are preferred along asphalt radius returns when arterial and collectors streets are without curbs. 6. Sheet 2, Indicate a dimensioned cross section detail for cut-off wall. 7. Sheet 2, Indicate Stationing, Offset and Elevation every 50-feet for Pavement Edge in plan view. 8. Sheet 2, Indicate Stationing, Offset and Elevation every 50-feet for Saw-cut, Trim, Tack & Join in plan view. 9. Sheet 2, Profile, Indicate the proper Slope direction between Sta. 13+87 & 14+24. Correct and revise. 10. Projects adjoining other jurisdictions must have proposed improvements approved by affective jurisdiction. City of Tucson Development Services is required to review, comment and approve the proposed development plan. A Floodplain Use Permit is required from COT/DSD due to this area is private development and in a FEMA Floodplain Zone A. Submit FUP issued by Pima County for review. Correct and revise. 11. Sheet 1, Detail A; Pedestrian areas/shoulders along side of strip paved streets should be a minimum of 8 feet wide, slope @ 2% and be separate to drainage ditches/channels. Correct and revise. 12. See redlines for additional corrections. 13. Mylar can be submitted once the above comments have been addressed and looked at for acceptance. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6634 or Blanca.Espino@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/26/2007 | LHENDRI1 | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
| 07/26/2007 | LHENDRI1 | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |