Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: T06PI00044
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
142 W ELVIRA RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL

Plan Number - T06PI00044
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review CHANGE TITLE BLOCK ON FIRST PAGE OF PIA
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES COT STREETS DIVISION Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES PC WASTEWATER MGMT Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES QUEST COMMUNICATION Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES COX COMMUNICATION Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES SOUTHWEST GAS CORP Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/02/2006 TAMI HAUSER UTILITY CLEARANCES KINDER MORGAN ENERGY Denied AUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS
10/03/2006 GARY WITTWER DOT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied There is an existing landscape project that runs across the front of your project. Please add the following notes and show on drawings:
1. The existing trees within the ROW must be preserved in place. Please show on plan.
2. The existing irrigation line (COT) must be preserved in place. The contractor will place the existing irrigation line in a 4" sch 40 sleeve under new paving at two locations. Sleeves must extend 12" beyond paving edge.


Please submit a copy of you approved NPPO plan.

I can not find the Recreation Area "B".
10/09/2006 RICHARD LEIGH DOT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied An approved Tenative Plat required with submittal.
10/13/2006 LANCE PETERSON DOT STREET MAINTENANCE REVIEW Denied We have reviewed there plans and have the following comments:

1. Plan shows a proposed 12' drainage easement (common area "A"). Who will be responcible for the maintenance of this easement?
2. Sheet 2 - Curb Acess Ramps - Ramps need to call out Truncated Domes.
3. Sheet 2 - Note 1 and 3 seem to be the same. Note 3 has the correct edition.

Landscaping

1. Common Area "B" was not found. Who will be responcible for the maintenance of common area b?
2. Any landscaping to be maintained by the City of Tucson needs to have the plan submitted to Paul Rosenboom at 4004 S. Park Avenue - 791-3154 ext 234.
3. All work in and around existing City irrigation lines and landscaping also needs to be cordinated with Paul Rosenboom at 791-3154 ext 234.

No further comments. 10/13/06
10/17/2006 JOSE ORTIZ DOT TRAFFIC REVIEW Denied October 17, 2006
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06PI00044
PROJECT NAME: El Stone Development
PROJECT ADDRESS: 142 W Elvira Rd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the plan.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. Provide dimensions of the cul-de-sac to ensure that the Development Standards are met, and to determine whether No Parking signs are warranted.

3. If parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs then signs need to be placed from PRC to PRC. If applicable, indicate No Parking on the plans by showing no parking signs. (DS 3-01.0 fig 20) (straight cul-de-sac)

4. If applicable, provide a detail of the No Parking signs to be used. Attached with this comment letter are the details of the 'NO PARKING" signs that the city requires.

5. Maintain 12 feet of separation between proposed curb cuts in the cul de sac. Shared driveways may be required to maintain the 12' separation, but be advised that no more then 2 lots can be serviced by a single driveway (3 or more lots would warrant a road).

6. On sheet 2 of 2 the labels/titles of the details are screened back and are difficult to read. The text needs to be darkened.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
11/14/2006 TAMI HAUSER PIA COORDINATOR CUSTOMER CALLED Completed
11/14/2006 TAMI HAUSER PIA COORDINATOR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed