Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00042
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Needs Review | |
| 08/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Needs Review | |
| 09/11/2006 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Please address the Native Plant Preservation Ord. If you have an approved NPPO for the site that includes the ROW, you can submit that for review. If it does not include the ROW please address if with a separate submittal. |
| 09/11/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 1 - There are two Streets and Traffic Maintenance signature lines on sheet 1. Please remove the one that is not in the title block. 2. Sheet 2 - Cross Sections C & D - Is there any proposed landscape work as part of this project? If there is, please contact Paul Rosenboom at 791-5279 ext 234 for review and coordination. 3. Sheet 3 - 6 - There appear to be new curb access ramps called out on these sheets. These new ramps should have a detail, or call out our standard detail. Also, truncated domes need to be specified in place of the tactile grooves. 4. Sheet 3 - 6 - Note 5 - This note references STD Detail 211 and should call out STD Detail 203. 5. Sheet 3 - The finished surface elevation at approximately station 19+20 appears to be high. This may create a ponding problem. No further comments. 9/11/06 |
| 09/13/2006 | Blanca Espino | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, Senior Engineering Associate Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The following comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. 1. Indicate book and page on cover sheet. Plat must be recorded before submittal of mylars for final review and approval. 2. Include the plan number "I-2006-070" in title block of each sheet. 3. Submit approved Tentative Plat and Drainage Report with next submittal. 4. If a flood plain use permit was issued for this project please include the following general note. "Floodplain Use Permit No._______, has been issued by Development Services Department for work impacting City and/or FEMA Floodplains." 5. Remove "ACCEPTED Street and Traffic Maintenance" signature line from cover sheet. 6. Submit a copy of the geotectecnical report supporting proposed pavement structural section. 7. The pavement structural section shown in Detail B/2 refers to a paving plan set for Harrison Road "I-88-49". Proposed pavement, at a minimum, must match existing. 8. Revise the pavement structural section detail B/1, include mix number and indicate the percentage of air voids. 9. The proposed curb reveal must match the existing. The as-builds for the Kino/Ajo Connection Ramp (I-81-58) indicates a gutter with a 7" reveal. 10. Provide valley gutters across driveway entrances per S.D. 208. 11. Depict and indicate the sidewalk transitions from the existing width to the proposed width. The lateral transition should not exceed 3:1. 12. Six (6) foot wide sidewalk is required along Ajo Way. 13. Keynote 5 references incorrect standard detail. 14. Provide a cross section representing the basin side slope adjacent to the Kino Parkway Connection Ramp roadway. The top-of-slope/hinge point must be a minimum of 2' from the property line. Additionally, barricade railing must be provided along any slope steeper than 3:1 and deeper than two (2) feet. 15. Label all proposed curb access ramps and refer to applicable standard detail. Additionally, include a detail for each type of ramp and indicate the use of truncated domes as the detectable warning device. 16. Provide a profile of the proposed roadway widening. 17. Driveway entrances should be designed to provide a cross slope of 2% (max.) within the pedestrian cross walk area. 18. Curb access ramps should be aligned across from each other. The ramps at the west driveway on Ajo Way are not aligned. 19. Provide additional details for the pipe connection required for the catch basin relocation at Sta. 17+03.78, 39.12 RT. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-3115 ext.448 or Richard.Leigh@tucsoz.gov |
| 09/14/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | September 14, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06PI00042 PROJECT NAME: Southgate Business Park PROJECT ADDRESS: 1979 E Ajo Way PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Sheet 5 of 6: Install an R6-1(R) "ONE WAY" Sign in the median along at both driveway locations along Ajo Way per PCDOT & TDOT Signing Manual (2002) Chap 9-3A. 3. Sheet 5 of 6: Install an R1-1 (Stop Sign) at the proposed driveway of this development off of Ajo Way (approximately Sta. 12+90) per PCDOT & TDOT Signing Manual (2002) Chap 5-11, 5-12, and Chap 9-2. 4. Sheet 5 of 6: Provide a 'RIGHTONLY' (R3-5R) under the proposed (R1-1) at the two driveways along Ajo Way 5. Sheet 5 of 6: Provide a 'RIGHT LANE' (R3-5F) supplemental plaque under all new (R3-5R) along all proposed right turn bays. 6. Sheet 5 of 6: In addition to the solid 6" white striping (WS6), for all right turn bays, raised pavement markings should be included (WS6-G20) per PCDOT & TDOT Pavement Marking Design Manual Sheet 4-13. 7. Sheet 5 of 6: Due to the configuration of the entrance at the southern entrance along the connection ramp treat the bull nose with something similar to the Pavement Marking Manual sheet 5-16 and the Signing Manual 9-5A (OM1-3 per sheet 9-14). 8. Sheet 2 of 6: Revise Striping note 1 to refer to the 2003 Edition of the PC/COT Standards and Specifications (not 1994). FYI the latest edition of the Pavement Marking Manual is 2002. 9. Sheet 2 of 6: Revise the Signing Note 1 to refer to the 2003 edition of the MUTCD (not 2000) 10. Sheet 2 of 6: revise Signing Note 6 "TYPE II" should read "TYPE IV ASTM" 11. Add the following Pavement Marking/Striping General Notes to the Plans: 'ALL STREET STRIPING & SIGNAGE TO BE COORDINATED WITH C.O.T. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CALL 791-4259 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL OF ANY SIGNAGE OR STRIPING. USE 2" SQUARE-TUBE POST AND SQUARE TUBE POST FOUNDATIONS FOR SIGNING. BARRICADE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF TUCSON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING FOR APPROVAL 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.' If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED | Completed | |
| 09/15/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |