Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00039
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/17/2006 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a copy of your approved NPPO plan. Be sure the inventory includes ROW impacted areas. 2. How does drainage cross scenic corridor and into ROW? per detail C-6. 3. Please call out 30' Scenic Corridor on sheet 3, and note protective fencing with limits of clearing at each entry road, on both sides of the new roads. |
| 08/18/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | August 18, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06PI00039 PROJECT NAME: Gracious Estates PROJECT ADDRESS: 5151 N Silverbell Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Re-stripe Silverbell Road at the two proposed intersections of Kiley CT/Silverbell Rd, and Gracious CT/Silverbell Rd per PCDOT & TDOT Pavement Marking Design Manual Chapter 3-3 and 5-1(refer to the minor street with no striping in section 5-1) 3. Install two R1-1 "Stop Signs" with street names at the two proposed roadways entering this development off of Silverbell Road per PCDOT & TDOT Signing Manual (2002) Chap 5-11, 5-12, and Chap 9-2. 4. Install a W14-2 "NO OUTLET" sign on Gracious Court entering this development off of Silverbell Road. 5. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing no parking signs on the plans. (DS 3-01.0 fig 20) (straight cul-de-sac) 6. Provide a detail of the No Parking sign to be used. If needed, a PDF drawing of the City of Tucson preferred "No Parking" sign could be provided upon request. 7. Add the following General Notes per PCDOT & TDOT Pavement Marking Design Manual Chapter 2-1 Notes: 1,2,10,13, and 17 8. Add the following Signing General Notes 5(a) & 5(b) per PCDOT & TDOT Signing Manual (2002) (Chapter 1, Sheet 12) to the Plans. 9. Add the following Pavement Marking/Striping General Notes to the Plans: 'ALL STREET STRIPING & SIGNAGE TO BE COORDINATED WITH C.O.T. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CALL 791-4259 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL OF ANY SIGNAGE OR STRIPING. ALL REQUIRED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. NEW STRIPING TO BE THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL. USE 2" SQUARE-TUBE POST AND SQUARE TUBE POST FOUNDATIONS FOR SIGNING. BARRICADE PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF TUCSON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING FOR APPROVAL 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.' 'ALL NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STREET NAMES MUST HAVE E-W BLOCK NUMBER ADDRESSES FOR E-W ROADWAYS AND N-S BLOCK NUMBER ADDRESSES FOR N-S ROADWAYS.' 'THE CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY ERRORS AND/OR OMISSIONS ON THESE PLANS. ITEMS NOT MEETING CITY STANDARDS SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED BY THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR AND AT NO COST TO THE CITY.' SEE TRAFFIC SIGNING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/23/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheets 2 - 8 - Note #1 - This note references STD 210 and should reference STD 209. 2. Roadway Section and Emergency Access - Is asphalt mix #2 going to be used for these roadways? Landscaping 1. Will there be any landscape improvements with this project? If so, please submit the lanscape plan to Paul Rosenboom at 4004 S. Park Avenue, Bld #6. Phone 791-3154. No further comments. 8/23/06 |
| 08/24/2006 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, Senior Engineering Associate Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The following comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. 1. Indicate book and page on cover sheet. Plat must be recorded before submittal of mylars for final review and approval. 2. Include the plan number "I-2006-068" in title blocks. 3. Provide the projects administrative address on cover sheet. 4. Include in the general notes information/details for all DSMRs issued for this project. 5. If a flood plain use permit was issued for this project please include FUP# in general notes. "Floodplain Use Permit No._______, has been issued by Development Services Department for work impacting City and/or FEMA Floodplains." 6. Provide a pavement structural detail for the proposed roadways, include mix number. 7. Submit a copy of the geotectecnical report supporting the proposed pavement structural sections. 8. Provide a signature line for Pima County DOT on the cover sheet. Pima County DOT must review and approve improvements within Pima County's jurisdiction of Wild Life Drive. 9. Indicate the limits of the proposed return headers at the proposed roadway intersections with Silverbell Road. 10. Will the proposed roadway intersections with Silverbell Road alter existing drainage patterns? Have the flows been identified. Have the additional flows from the proposed roadways been accounted for? 11. Indicate that all pedestrian refuge areas will be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the maximum density. 12. Remove contour lines for plan views. 13. The proposed intercept channels along Kiley Court and Wild Life Drive must be located outside of the public right-of-way (ROW) with the top-of -slope being a minimum of two (2) feet away from R/W line. Additionally, these channels should be encumbered by a private drainage easement with the maintenance being the responsibility of the homeowners association. 14. Sheet 2: Grades shown in Cul-de-sac of Kiley Court conflict with grades shown in detail P/8. 15. Sheet 2: Provide additional details on how flows captured in the intercept channel along Kiley Court will be discharged into the Silverbell Road right-of-way. Are these flows going to be discharged at their pre-developed location? What type of erosion protection will be provided? 16. Sheet 2: Provide a keynote for the pavement joint requirements at Kiley Court and Silverbell Road. 17. Sheet 3: Flows from the south side of Gracious Court must be conveyed beneath the roadway as indicated in the approved drainage report. Provide all details for this structure. 18. Sheet 4: Provide all details for connecting the proposed roadway (Wild Life Dr.) to the existing roadway of Wild Life Drive. Show existing roadway infrastructure. The connection will have to be approved by Pima County Department of Transportation. 19. Sheet 5: Provide additional details for the intersection of the emergency access road and Silverbell Road. 20. Sheet 6, Indicate that all slopes 3:1 and greater require grouted rip rap and slopes less than 3:1 require hydro-seed. 21. Sheet 6: Indicate the ROW limits on cross sections details. 22. Sheet 6, D: Provide a perpendicular cross section of the proposed Storm drains across Wild Life Drive. 23. Sheet 6, Detail H: Provide details for the cut-off wall. 24. Exclude all details that are not part of the proposed right-of-way improvements or cross out with a bold "X" and label "NOT PART OF PIA" If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-3115 ext.448 or Richard.Leigh@tucsoz.gov |
| 09/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED | Completed | |
| 09/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |