Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00035
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/05/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Needs Review | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
09/14/2006 | Estevan Tineo | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 9/14/2006: (T06PI00035) Tucson Mall Oil Stop - Storm Drain modification The following comments, at a minimum, must be addressed in the next submittal. 1. Sheet 1 of 2: Provide the notes as attached on this sheet. Notes provided but Storm Drain notes must be modified. Change Not 5. To read as note 25 (under grading notes) and note 6 with note 29 (under grading notes). 2. Sheet 2 of 2: Detail proposed storm drain junction structures in this plan set. This comment has not been addressed. Detail Storm drain junction structures on the plan sheet. 3. Sheet 2 of 2: Storm Drain easement, provide recordation for new storm drain easement. 4. Does the proposed storm drain modifications convey the design flow as under existing conditions? Was the proposed storm drain hydraulic grade line considered in design the proposed storm drain modifications? This comment has not been addressed. Provide a HGL analysis demonstrating that the proposed modifications (the calcs must take into account both minor and junction structures head loss) will not result in upstream issues (will not increase the HGL at most upstream end of the storm drain system). 5. Provide the DSD floodplain Use Permit Number (note 28) for the proposed drainage modifications. |
09/29/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 2 - Storm drain manhole # 4 is labeled # 3. Landscaping 1. The City does have irrigation lines along the north and west shoulders. Work around these lines needs to be corrdinated with Paul Rosenboom at 791-3154, exct 234. No further comments. 9/29/06 |
10/09/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
10/09/2006 | THAUSER1 | CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
10/09/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |