Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00022
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/19/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 1 - Please provide a Streets and Traffic Maintenance signature block. 2. Sheet 2 - 6 - Note 18 - Removable post barricades should be standard detail 107. 3. Sheet 3 of 7 - Who is responcible for the maintenance of Common Area "B"? No further comments. 7/19/06 |
07/20/2006 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/20/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | July 20, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06PI00022 PROJECT NAME: 6th & Medina (S05-081) PROJECT ADDRESS: 120 E Medina Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Diahn Swartz, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA; therefore a revised PIA is required for resubmittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Sheet 1 of 1, Reference Site Plan: Is the street name Desert View Ave or is it Desert Manor Ave (see sheets 3, 4 and 6)? 2. Sheet 2 of 7: New pavement being added at Medina Road. Indicate existing STOP sign. Indicate relocation of existing stop sign. 3. Sheet 3 if 7: Remove STOP sign at Manor View Court and Manor View Road. 4. Sheet 3 if 7: Remove EB STOP sign at Manor View Road and Desert Manor Ave (or is Desert View Ave? see first comment). 5. Sheet 3 if 7: Remove SB STOP sign at SB Desert Manor Ave (or is Desert View Ave? see first comment) and Manor View Road. 6. Sheet 4 of 7: Clarify the name of the street (see first comment). 7. Sheet 4 of 7: Remove STOP sign at Desert Manor Ave (?) and Medina Road. 8. Sheet 4 of 7: Remove Speed Limit Sign on Desert Manor Ave (?). 9. Sheet 4 of 7: Remove EB STOP sign at EB Manor View and Desert Manor. 10. Sheet 4 of 7: Remove NO OUTLET sign at top of cul-de-sac. 11. Sheet 4 of 7, Key Note 24: Do not refer to R7-127. Use the City of Tucson Standard No Parking sign, which reads "No Parking Symbol, FIRE ACCESS, TOW AWAY." Show the detail that includes the "BEGIN" and "END" for use on cul-de-sacs. Include this detail on Sheet 7 of 7. Refer to this detail in the Key Note 24. 12. Sheet 4 of 7: Show parking prohibition beginning at the beginning of the cul de sac (use sign referred to in the standard detail). Show parking prohibition sign at top of cul de sac (possibly where No Outlet is currently shown). Show parking prohibition end at the end of the cul de sac. Signing should conform to detail to be shown on sheet 7 of 7. See pdf of detail for these signs attached to 2nd submittal review set. 13. Sheet 4 of 7, Key Note 25. Remove Reference to No Outlet Sign. The SPR7-02G sited in this key note refers to a parking supplemental placard. The cul-de-sacs in this plan set are not so long as to require a No Outlet. No Outlets can be added to the street name signs, if necessary. 14. Sheet 5 of 7: Remove stop sign at SB Manor View Court and Manor View Road. Have Parking prohibition signs conform to the detail, as discussed for Sheet 4 of 7. 15. Sheet 5 of 7, Key Note 24: Remove reference to R7-127. Replace with reference to detail on sheet 7 of 7. 16. Sheet 5 of 7, Key Note 25: Remove reference to No Outlet sign. If necessary, No Outlet may be added to street name signs. 17. Sheet 6 of 7: Show relocation of Stop Sign at Medina and 6th Avenue. 18. Sheet 6 of 7: Remove Stop sign at SB Desert View/Manor and Medina Road. 19. Sheet 6 of 7: Clarify name of street. Is it Desert View or Desert Manor? Note that the Match line indicates Desert View. 20. Sheet 2 of 7 Please provide a striping plan for all new pavement being added to 6th Avenue. Plan set should include the limits of all the new pavement being added to 6th Avenue and include a plan for transition to existing cross section on the north side. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov. Diahn Swartz conducted the review, but I will handle all review comment questions and conduct all resubmittal reviews. |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/25/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
07/27/2006 | Blanca Espino | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PIA Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Submit a copy of the approved Geotechnical Report referencing soil recommendations for public streets. 3. Submit a copy of the approved Drainage Report. 4. Sheets 2-6, Remove Key Note 4. 5. Sheet 1, Correct text in Title block. 6. Sheet 1, Indicate Book and Page recordation information. Fill in blanks. 7. Indicate Docket & Page for 6th Avenue right-of-way dedication as per the approved Tentative Plat. 8. S05-081 indicates administrative address to be 120 E. Medina Road. Correct and revise. 9. Sheet 2, Indicate all of the proposed road improvement for 6th Ave. Indicate Left side and Centerline information on Profile. Indicate Top of curb, Gutter line, Existing or Finished Grade @ CL or PL, Existing ground. 10. Sheet 2, Indicate Stationing, Offset (all transitions) for Beginning and Ending Saw, Trim, Tack & Join and Match New Pavement to Existing. 11. Sheet 2, Indicate all Stationing & Offset transitions for new pavement. 12. Sheet 3, Graphically indicate Key Note 5. See redlines. 13. Sheet 3, Centerline profile correct text overlay. See redlines. 14. Sheet 3, Identify symbol in legend. See redlines. 15. Sheet 3, Hinge point of slope/basin must be a minimum of 2-foot from fight-of-way. (Slope on private side). Correct and revise. See redlines. 16. Sheet 4, Identify dashed line. See redlines. 17. Sheet 5, Hinge point of slope/basin must be a minimum of 2-foot from fight-of-way. (Slope on private side). Correct and revise. See redlines. 18. Sheet 5, Centerline profile; indicate percent of slope. See redlines. 19. Sheet 6, Indicate Beginning and Ending Chip Seal's Stationing & Offset information. 20. Sheet 6, Indicate Stationing, Offset (all transitions) for Beginning and Ending Saw, Trim, Tack & Join and Match New Pavement to Existing. 21. Sheet 6, Profile; identify lines. See redlines. 22. Sheet 7, Add note to Paving Notes: All construction activity and test methods shall be in conformance with Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Specifications for Public Improvements (PC/COT SSPI) 2003 Edition. 23. Sheet 7, Add note to Paving Notes: Pavement Section Design documentation, are in accordance to the approved Geotechnical Report, Report Name and Firm Name. 24. Sheet 7, Detail 1; Indicate percent slope in sidewalk area flow direction. Indicate a hinge point of 2-feet from property line. 25. Sheet 7, Detail 2A, 5-foot wide sidewalks are required as per D.S. 3-01.4.1.A.1.a Correct and revise. 26. Sheet 7, Details 5 & 6 call out for Barricade Railing, graphically indicate location of railing on plan view. 27. Sheet 7, Detail A is not depicted correctly on Detail 5. Indicate Slope. Correct Width for Std. Dtl. 305 is 16 inches. Correct and revise. 28. Sheet 7, Detail 7A; see redlines for corrections. 29. Key Note 18, graphically indicate location of removable post barricade on plan view. 30. Indicate a dimensioned detail structural section for all street types to be used on project. Indicate % compaction amount. 31. Indicate a dimensioned detail of modified SD 216 as per Key Notes 19 & 20. 32. Indicate a dimensioned detail of Saw, Trim, Tack & Join. |
08/08/2006 | THAUSER1 | CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
08/08/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
08/08/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |