Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00020
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20/2006 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Waiting for landscape maintenance agreement. |
| 07/20/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. General - Is there ay landscaping to be installed with this project? If so, please submit the landscaping plan to Paul Rosenboon at 4004 S. Park Avenue, 791-3154. 2. Sheet 2 - Note 4 - My question with the asphalt is what asphalt mix will be specified? Will it be PAG mix #1, Mix #2, or Mix #3? 3. Sheet 4 of 17 - Will the homeowners association be responcible for the maintenance of common area "C"? No further comments. 7/20/06 |
| 07/20/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | July 20, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06PI00020 PROJECT NAME: Sierra Morado Unit 2 Phase 3 PROJECT ADDRESS: 10675 E Bilby Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Diahn Swartz, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA; therefore a revised PIA is required for resubmittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. General: Need signing/striping plans for Metropolitan Drive, Ladyslipper Place (signing only), and Tiger Lily Place (signing). 2. Sheet 1/17, Cover Sheet. Specify relevant PAD No. near the title block. 3. Sheet 2/17: Signage legend on this sheet is not being used in this plan set. 4. Sheet 9/17, parking details: Show direction of one-way travel for parking details. 5. Sheet 9/17, parking details: Show line types for pavement markings (e.g., WS4). 6. Sheet 11/17, Major Collector Street (Drexel Road): Need to provide bike facilities. Option 1: Change cross section to provide two 5-ft bike lanes + two 10-ft through lanes + 10 ft TWLTL. Option 1 requires 40 foot curb-to-curb. Option 2: Retain existing 36 ft cross section and instead of striping a center TWLTL, put in a double yellow solid stripe (+ RPMs), to provide a wide curb lane. 7. Sheet 11/17, Major Collector Street (Metropolitan): Change Metropolitan Street to Metropolitan Drive. 8. Sheet 14/17, Signing General Notes: Signing Note 1 should specify the 2003 MUTCD. 9. Sheet 14/17, Signing General Notes: Rewrite Note 6: "All warning sign panels shall be fluorescent yellow diamong-grade (DG-cubed or equivalent) sheeting. All school zone signs shall be fluorescent yellow-green diamond grade (DG-cubed or equivalent) sheeting. All other sign panels shall have High Intensity Prismatic Type IV sheeting." 10. Sheet 14/17, Signing Summary: Change minimum sheeting type per new signing standards. 11. Sheet 14/17: Add detail for No Parking sign ("Symbolic No Parking Fire Access Tow Away"). Include a detail for Begin and End of No Parking on cul-de-sacs (relevant for Tiger Lily Place and Ladyslipper Place). 12. Sheet 15/17, Striping Notes: Rewrite Note 3 for relevant roadways, including Drexel, Metropolitan Drive, Tiger Lily Place, Ladyslipper Place. 13. Sheet 16/17, Traffic Circle: Remove high-visibility crosswalk at traffic circle. 14. Sheet 16/17, Traffic Circle: Stop control on all approaches. See City of Tucson Neighborhood Traffic Management sketch for signing/marking the traffic circle (attached). In general use twice as many RPMs and object markers, given the size of the circle. 15. Sheet 16/17, Traffic Circle: Place some white RPMs on the islands that separate the traffic from the ped path. 16. Sheet 16/17: Show location of No Parking signs. 17. Sheet 17/17: See signing comments for sheet 16/17. Label the signing sheet "Signing Plans" and the label the striping sheet "Striping plans." 18. Sheet 17/17: Remove extra callout line (DR-11). See attached reference documents for detail preperation. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov. Diahn Swartz conducted the review, but I will handle all review comment questions and conduct all resubmittal reviews. |
| 07/21/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/26/2006 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, Senior Engineering Associate Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The following comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. 1. Indicate asphaltic concrete mix designation for the proposed roadways. Include a structural detail. 2. Provide line and curve data for all proposed roadways. 3. Provide all construction and structural details for the proposed Con-Arch structure on Drexel Road. 4. Sheet 10: Label and reference storm sewer structures. 5. Indicate the proposed construction details for tying into existing roadway infrastructure at Civano Boulevard and Metropolitan Drive (new to existing pavement, curb and sidewalk connections). 6. Sheet 9: Provide additional details for the parking area at Nightbloom Way and Drexel Road, show pedestrian circulation path. Is ADA required access provided for the parking area? 7. Sheet 11, Detail "A" and "B": Indicate slopes and direction of roadway, pedestrian paths and roadway shoulders. 8. Sheet 12: Provide all structural details for the proposed catch basins. 9. Sheet 12, Detail I, section A-A: Indicate slope, length and invert of pipe. 10. Sheet 12, Detail G, Indicate slope, length and invert of pipe in section view. Additionally, label section and provide a section reference. 11. Include in the legend all the lines and shadings used in plan set. 12. Provide a profile for each guttrer and pavement edge for Metropolitan Drive and Drexel Rd. 13. Remove contour lines from plan views. 14. The roadway tapers at the east and west ends of Drexel Road must be consisting of a standard pavement structure section per the geotechnical report recommendations. 15. All existing utility easements within the proposed right-of-way must be abandoned. Note recordation information in plan set. 16. Ten feet of separation must be provided from the side of the storm drain pipe and the right-of-way limits. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-3115 ext.448 or Richard.Leigh@tucsoz.gov |
| 08/01/2006 | THAUSER1 | CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed | |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |
| 08/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | SUBMIT UTILITY CLEARANCE LETTERS |