Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00016
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/11/2006 | THAUSER1 | CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Passed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Passed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/11/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 07/28/2006 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/03/2006 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revised NPPO and Landscape plan not received. |
| 08/04/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 3 of 26 - Detail C - This detail shows a landscape area. Who will maintain this area? 2. General - There are several sidewalk scuppers shown on the plans. It appears that there is erosion protection at each of the outlets. Please verify that there is erosion protection at the outlets. No further comments. 8/4/06 |
| 08/09/2006 | Estevan Tineo | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 8/8/2006 (T06PI000016) La Estancia De Tucson Lots 1-330 The following comments, at a minimum, must be addressed in the next submittal: 1. Darken the font for all r/w improvements, including sidewalk and ramps. The font for existing items in the r/w (for example sewer lines) should be lightened (typical comment). 2. Sheet 3 of 26: Details C and D, state which items the PAD covers. For example, for detail C, state "No-Parking" and for Detail D state "No-parking and 4'-sidewalk". 3. Sheet 4 of 26: The proposed scuppers must not result in sidewalk running slopes, on both sides of the scuppers, exceed 12:1. Please check all scuppers. 4. Sheet 5 of 26: (Previous comment 17) Details B and C are not very clear and still indicates gutter depression in the roadway travel way. Revise catch basin design accordingly. 5. Previous comment 18, call out cur transitions. For example the plan view, for all the sheets, depict curb transitions but does not call out the appropriate detail (For example each depicted curb transition would make reference to Detail 210). Revise. 6. Previous comment 19, the plans must call out which ramp detail is to be used at each ramp location. Revise. 7. Proposed ramps should line up to each other, for example Sheet 9/26 indicates two ramps, one at station 173+27.62, 13' LT and corresponding ramp at 172+92.68, 13 RT (35' apart). Please revise ramps and check all the other ramps and revise as needed. 8. Previous comment 32 and 33: Detail J/4 indicates a modified wall transition and refers to B-08.10. Detail B-08.10 indicates 4' cutoff walls. Per ADOT Standard Details provide the appropriate cutoff walls. 9. Sheet 8 of 26, profile view of scupper 18 (SC/18) seems to indicate a sidewalk slope greater than 12:1. Revise sidewalk slope and check remaining scuppers. |
| 08/22/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Completed | PLEASE SUBMIT UTILITY LETTERS FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS AND KINDER MORGAN. IF THESE ARE NOT APPLICABLE YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THE LETTERS WITH NOT APPLICABLE STATES ON THEM. |
| 08/23/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
| 08/23/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |