Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00006
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2006 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Reduce plant quantities by 50%. This is way too much for us to maintain. |
| 05/23/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 2 of 6 - Right Turn Lane Detail - This detail calls for a thickened edge in the middle of the paved lane. Typically thickened edges are on the edge of strip paved roadways. Is this detail correct? Landscaping 1. Sheet 5 of 6 - The plans call for tying into existing water. There is no existing water source. 2. Sheet 6 of 6 - Detail #5 - Need to specify Sch 80 PVC unions. 3. Sheet 6 of 6 - Detail #9 - It appears that the first detail number 9 should be labeled number 6. Also, you need to use multiport emitters. 4. Sheet 6 of 6 - Detail #8 - This detail needs to meet C.O.T. specifications. No further comments. 5/23/06 |
| 05/24/2006 | Blanca Espino | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PIA Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Do not fold plan sets. 3. All text height is to be 0.12 (1/8 inches). Correct text height for AMEC address & numbers on all sheets. 4. Sheet 1, Remove text on plan view. See redlines. 5. Sheet 2, Indicate a dimensioned Right-of-Way cross section detail of Houghton Road showing Existing, New and Future pavement structural information. See redlines. 6. Sheet 2, Detail A-A, Indicate street slope, property line / right-of-way limits, arrows should point to objects that are being called out, remove thickened edge detail, saw cut is 2-foot minimum, new pavement section should read 1. See redlines. Correct and revise. 7. Sheet 2, Detail B-B, Indicate street slope, property line / right-of-way limits, remove thickened edge detail, saw cut is 1-foot minimum, call out new or existing vertical curb. See redlines. Correct and revise. 8. Sheet 3, Remove word "Grading" from sheet heading "Paving and Grading Plan". Correct and revise. 9. Sheet 3, Stationing on plan and profile sheets should increase from Left to Right regardless of which way the north arrow points. Graphically indicate stationing on Plan view. See redlines. Correct and revise. 10. Sheet 3, Indicate street slope for proposed area and show graphically. 2% minimum. See redlines. Correct and revise. 11. Sheet 3, Relocate Curve Data Table and Details below Profile. 12. Sheet 3, Pavement thickness and surface treatment should match after saw cutting at a minimum of 2-foot into existing pavement. Correct and revise. 13. Sheet 3, Elevations at STA. 92+10.76 and 92+55.74 show a big difference. Correct and revise. 14. Sheet 3, Indicate a dimensioned detail for sidewalk area along Stations 93+00 to 91+00. Sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks. Terminal curb sections/sidewalk at end of curbs and concrete header at end of pavement are required. Correct and revise. 15. Sheet 3, Indicate 5 of compaction for Existing pavement and Pavement Section 1. 16. Indicate a dimensioned detail of curb access ramp to be built. Truncated Domes are required. Correct and revise. |
| 05/26/2006 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this PIA submittal: 1. I missed it first time, remove all reference to crosswalks across driveways. A .pdf submittal showing the removal of the crosswalks will satisfy this correction. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/01/2006 | THAUSER1 | CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Needs Review | |
| 06/01/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Needs Review | |
| 06/14/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
| 06/14/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |