Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00002
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | Estevan Tineo | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | (March 21, 2006) Permits and Codes has reviewed the proposed project (T06PI00002) and included the following comments. The next submittal must address these comments, at a minimum, and include in writing how each comment was addressed. 1. Previous comment 1 "1. Sheet 1 of 4: Provide the Book and Page under the Title" not addressed. Provide the recordation information for the new subdivision not for the existing subdivision. 2. Previous comment 2 addressed. 3. Previous comment 3 "3. Will the sewer be installed before the right-of-way Improvements? If so then prepare a separate sewer plan for Pima County Waste Water and DOT review." Not addressed. A separate plan was provided, however the sewer plan review is not part of the PIA process and must be submitted separately. The sewer plan must be submitted to DOT and Pima county directly. 4. Previous comment 4 addressed. 5. Previous comment 5 addressed. 6. Previous comment 6 addressed. 7. Previous comment 7 addressed. 8. Previous comment 8 not fully addressed. Roadway profile provided, however profile stationing should line-up with plan view stationing as typically practiced in the profession. 9. Previous comment 9 addressed. 10. Previous comment 10 not fully addressed. The handicap ramp on the north side of the roadway should be centered along lot line as to provide equal driveway access for the abutting lots. 11. Previous comment 11 not fully addressed. The plans must fully detail each type of ramp on plans. 12. Previous comment 12 "12. Detail each type of ramp to be used in project, include truncated domes." Plans must detail each type of ramp to be used for the subject project. 13. Previous comment 13 not fully addressed, see comment 8. 14. Previous comment 14 addressed. 15. Previous comment 15 addressed. 16. Previous comment 16 not fully addressed. Fully detail proposed scupper including scupper profile and section view. 17. Previous comment 17 not fully addressed. Provide a cross section extending along the proposed entrance including the adjacent scupper. Fully detail driveway. 18. Previous comment 18 not addressed. The "revised" drainage report only pertains to the detention basin sizing and does not include any scupper sizing? The report include the scupper calculations and approval from DSD. 19. Previous comment 19 not addressed. The "revised" drainage report only pertains to the detention basin sizing and does not include any roadway drainage analysis, please see the previous comment. |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Needs Review | |
03/21/2006 | THAUSER1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Needs Review | |
03/22/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 3 - Handrail calls for standard detail 210 and it should be standard detail 105. No further comments. 3/21/06 |
03/27/2006 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this PIA submittal: 1. The no parking sign at lot 12 needs to be rotated 180 degrees. 2. Add an additional no parking sign at a midpoint in the cul-de-sac as was indicated on the 1st submittal redlines. 3. Add "Begin" and "End" placards as appropriate to the no parking signs as was indicated on the 1st submittal redlines. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
03/28/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
03/28/2006 | THAUSER1 | CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
03/28/2006 | TAMI HAUSER | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |