Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T06PI00002
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2006 | Estevan Tineo | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | (January 19, 2006) Permits and Codes has reviewed the proposed project (T06PI00002) and included the following comments. The next submittal must address these comments, at a minimum, and include in writing how each comment was addressed. 1. Sheet 1 of 4: Provide the Book and Page under the Title. 2. Sheet 1 of 4: Remove the additional signature line for COTDOT. 3. Sheet 1 of 4: Will the sewer be installed before the right-of-way improvements? If so then prepare a separate sewer plan for Pima County Waste Water and DOT review. 4. Sheet 1 of 4: Remove the applicant information, not needed. 5. Sheet 1 of 4: Remove the " RECORDED SUBDIVISIONS WITH M&P BK/PG:" information, this information is not needed. 6. Sheet 1 of 4: Place the project administrative address on the plan. 7. Sheet 1 of 4: Revise Title Block approvals. 8. Sheet 2 of 4: Place profile below plan view per City Engineering Standards. 9. Sheet 2 of 4: Plan view indicates a detail A/C4 but the plans do not have a sheet C4? Please revise accordingly. 10. Sheet 2 of 4: Provide additional handicap ramps at about station 11+00. 11. Sheet 2 of 4: Provide corner type of ramp at roadway entrance. 12. Detail each type of ramp to be used in project, include truncated domes. 13. Sheet 3 of 4: Provide Plan and Profile on one sheet, see comment 8 above. 14. Sheet 3 of 4: General Paving Notes: Add the following notes: · Signage and striping should be coordinated with Traffic Engineering and installed at no expense tot he public. Call Traffic Engineering at 791-4259 prior to installation or removal of striping and signage. · All Drainage infrastructures, indicated on the plans, are in accordance to the approved Drainage Report as approved by Development Services Department. 15. Sheet 3 of 4: Remove note 13. 16. Sheet 4 of 4: Provide details for proposed scupper, include invert elevations, top of scupper elevation, and stationing. 17. Sheet 4 of 4: Detail proposed driveway (Detention/Retention Basin access) per COT Standards. 18. The plans indicate scuppers but the approved drainage report does not provide any supporting calculations? Please revise and resubmit to DSD for review and approval, in accordance to City Development Standards. 19. The plans indicate a typical type of roadway crown section with wedge curbing, however the drainage report does not include the supporting drainage calculations? Please revise and resubmit to DSD for review and approval, in accordance to City Development Standards. |
| 01/20/2006 | THAUSER1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 01/27/2006 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/03/2006 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Please provide a Streets and Traffic Maintenance signature block on sheet 1. 2. Sheet 4 of 4 - Deatil 1 - It looks like there should be handrail called out at the back of the sidewalk scupper. No further comments. 2/3/06 |
| 02/11/2006 | THAUSER1 | DOT ENGINEERING | UTILITY AWARENESS NOTIFICATION | Needs Review | (January 19, 2006) Permits and Codes has reviewed the proposed project (T06PI00002) and included the following comments. The next submittal must address these comments, at a minimum, and include in writing how each comment was addressed. 1. Sheet 1 of 4: Provide the Book and Page under the Title. 2. Sheet 1 of 4: Remove the additional signature line for COTDOT. 3. Sheet 1 of 4: Will the sewer be installed before the right-of-way improvements? If so then prepare a separate sewer plan for Pima County Waste Water and DOT review. 4. Sheet 1 of 4: Remove the applicant information, not needed. 5. Sheet 1 of 4: Remove the " RECORDED SUBDIVISIONS WITH M&P BK/PG:" information, this information is not needed. 6. Sheet 1 of 4: Place the project administrative address on the plan. 7. Sheet 1 of 4: Revise Title Block approvals. 8. Sheet 2 of 4: Place profile below plan view per City Engineering Standards. 9. Sheet 2 of 4: Plan view indicates a detail A/C4 but the plans do not have a sheet C4? Please revise accordingly. 10. Sheet 2 of 4: Provide additional handicap ramps at about station 11+00. 11. Sheet 2 of 4: Provide corner type of ramp at roadway entrance. 12. Detail each type of ramp to be used in project, include truncated domes. 13. Sheet 3 of 4: Provide Plan and Profile on one sheet, see comment 8 above. 14. Sheet 3 of 4: General Paving Notes: Add the following notes: · Signage and striping should be coordinated with Traffic Engineering and installed at no expense tot he public. Call Traffic Engineering at 791-4259 prior to installation or removal of striping and signage. · All Drainage infrastructures, indicated on the plans, are in accordance to the approved Drainage Report as approved by Development Services Department. 15. Sheet 3 of 4: Remove note 13. 16. Sheet 4 of 4: Provide details for proposed scupper, include invert elevations, top of scupper elevation, and stationing. 17. Sheet 4 of 4: Detail proposed driveway (Detention/Retention Basin access) per COT Standards. 18. The plans indicate scuppers but the approved drainage report does not provide any supporting calculations? Please revise and resubmit to DSD for review and approval, in accordance to City Development Standards. 19. The plans indicate a typical type of roadway crown section with wedge curbing, however the drainage report does not include the supporting drainage calculations? Please revise and resubmit to DSD for review and approval, in accordance to City Development Standards. |
| 02/13/2006 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this PIA: 1. Add a general note to read “All non-signalized intersection street names must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways.” 2. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to the point opposite the PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing no parking signs on the plans. (DS 3-01.0 fig 21) Add no parking sign detail as provided on the redlines. 3. Add R1-1 sign to project egress. 4. Add W14-2 sign to project ingress. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/22/2006 | THAUSER1 | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED | Completed | |
| 02/22/2006 | THAUSER1 | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |