Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06OT03210
Parcel: 13507330J

Address:
7620 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T06OT03210
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/31/2007 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: George G. Lance DATE: January 31, 2007
Architect
6418 E. Tanque Verde, #102
Tucson, Arizona 85715

SUBJECT: Desert Toyota, 7620 E. 22nd Street
Site plan T07CM03210 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 20

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. This project was reviewed for full code compliance.
3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
7. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
8. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
9. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
10. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
11. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
12. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
13. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP.
14. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG.
15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
16. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
17. Show Site plan number (T06OT03210) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
18. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
19. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address.
20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
21. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
22. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
23. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
24. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
25. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. A Drainage report is required for any site greater than one acre in size or for any site subject to detention requirements…..per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2.
3. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR.
5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/7620 E. 22nd Street Site
12/15/2006 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/21/2006 HEATHER THRALL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied see zoning review comments please.
12/21/2006 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Senior Planner

PROJECT: T06OT03210
7620 E. 22nd Street, new parking lot for Toyota
Site plan, 1st review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 21, 2006

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and International Building Code 2003 (IBC). The content of the site plan was reviewed under DS 2-02. Staff acknowledges the site underwent a rezoning in 1972, however, the last plan for this project was a site plan, not a development plan and thus continues to be with this project. THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED FOR FULL CODE COMPLIANCE DUE TO THE LARGE LOT AREA EXPANSION.

2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.2, I see that the lots were split off from one another in the last few years. Please provide documentation that these lots went through a city review and approval process for their configuration. Please advise if they will be combined through the course of this project. At the very least, a lot combination covenant will be required to ensure the lots shall function as one even if they are sold individually. Further review comments may be forthcoming. ( I see on the last approved site plan there is an old lot split exception noted, do you have a copy of it?)

3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.5, please add lot dimensions and bearings to sheet C1.

4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6, for records, please dimension the existing building, list the height and the use - is it still auto repair or will it convert to auto sales? Parking calculations and other design criteria vary greatly between these uses.

5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, for records, list the required setbacks and provided building setbacks.

6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, with regards to parking:
A) please clarify what the intended use of the site is - retain auto repair or now auto sales
B) based upon the use, please provide a parking calculation at ratio listed in LUC 3.3.4
C) I see the detail of parking space dimensions, thank you -please dimension the standard wheel stop barrier to be fully contained within 2'6" of the top of the space
D) Please provide the width of the PAALs
E) Note that back up spurs are needed at the end of a row of parking if the PAAL width is not a minimum of 36'
F) Add note to handicapped parking sign that the fine is $518.00
G) Revise handicapped parking sign height to be 7' - measured from grade to bottom of sign (not including van accessible sign)
H) Where is handicapped parking on sheet C1?
I) Need a van accessible space - which is an 8' access aisle
J) Need 6 total handicapped spaces for providing 183 motor vehicle spaces
K) If auto sales, are these spaces that you're providing for auto display or for customers?
L) If display for auto sales, show are and you don't have to park to DS 3-05

7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9, bicycle parking
A) number is based upon the total of vehicle spaces provided (refer to LUC 3.3.4 under use)
B) as this is full code compliance, the bike racks that are on site must be replaced with the new designs listed in the updated DS 2-09 (see www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd codes)
C) show that the location of the bicycle parking meets DS 2-09
D) show the class 1 bicycle detail

8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, please dimension the entry to the site and provide directional arrows for PAALs (two way appears to be all over site)

9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, with regards to handicapped and pedestrian circulation:
A) clarify on sheet C1 where sidewalks/cross walks are
B) dimension all sidewalks/crosswalks
C) point out where ramps are with specs on slope/dimensions
D) truncated domes are required where transitioning from pedestrian to vehicular use areas (See ANSI 705.5.) call out on sheet C1

10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13, show any new proposed free-standing signage or lighting with specs if applicable.

11. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14, I see the existing loading area thank you.

12. Per DS 2-02.2.1.19, please show the right of way dimensions on sheet C1, noting centerline, current and future curb.

13. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, please be sure any and all easements are on sheet C1 with dimensions and type, docket and page.

14. Per DS 2-02.2.1.30, note rezoning case number and any conditions associated.

15. Per DS 2-02.2.1.38, list any prior special applications (variances, etc.)

16. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2, I see the expansion of lot area, thank you. Please express in percentage of expansion and note the total site area.

17. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.3, I see the existing Floor area ratio calc, thank you. Please advise what the new FAR will be with the additional lot area.

18. Please advise of any phasing.

19. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. Should you need to reach me, email me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608.

HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T06OT03210 7620 E. 22nd Street.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
12/21/2006 HTHRALL1 ADA REVIEW Passed
12/28/2006 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Landscaping requirements apply to expansion of existing development as follows:
If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area. The requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. Verify expansion calculations.

2. Submit a landscape plan per DS 2-07.0. to verify that entire site meets current minimum requirements. Indicate all improvements including parking lot layout and curbing identical to site plan.

3. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Dimension landscape borders.

4. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4

5. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g

6. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4.

7. A 5' wall is required to screen parking lot from presidential and office zoned properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I

8. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I

9. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Verify entire site meets canopy tree requirement.

10. Landscaping along parking lots where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B

11. Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native

12. Additional comments may apply.
12/28/2006 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/13/2007 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed