Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM06535
Parcel: 12308002B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T06CM06535
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2007 BETSY COTTLE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
01/03/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Farmers Insurance Remodel
T06CM06535
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 3, 2007

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\building\t06cm06535.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved and stamped site plan and additional requested documents
01/12/2007 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2003.
2. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference Section 104.2, IECC 2003.
3. Provide a mechanical plan for the new work. Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2003.
4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference Section 401.2, IMC 2003.
01/12/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2003, for business occupancy.
2. Provide descriptions (e.g. manufacturer and model) or the material standards for all plumbing fixtures and faucets. Clarify the type of water closet specified for P-2; it is scheduled as a tank-type but drawn as a flush-valve. Reference Section 401.1, UPC 2003.
3. Show that the floor of the restroom slopes toward the floor drain. Reference Section 412.2, UPC 2003.
4. The submitted water pressure calculations do not support the size of water piping to the urinal and lavatory. Reference Sections 610.1 and 610.5, UPC 2003.
5. The fixture connection sizes called out for the flush valve for the urinal (water closet also?) will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference Section A 6.1, UPC 2003 and IAPMO IS 3-2000, Section 610.0.
6. General plumbing note #5 indicates that PEX is an allowable material for the water distribution system. If so, provide sizing criteria for PEX, in addition to that provided for copper, that is in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and with velocities not exceeding 8 feet per second. Reference Section 610.1, UPC 2003.
7. Provide protection of the trap seal for the floor drain. Reference Sections 1007.0 and 1007.1, UPC 2003, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Coordinate the electrical requirements for the water heaters and the electrical design. Reference Section 310.4, UPC 2003.
9. Resize the shock absorber to conform to the manufacturer's listing requirements and the applicable standard, PDI-WH-201-1992. Reference Section 310.4, UPC 2003.
01/12/2007 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
01/24/2007 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Demo Floor Plan on Sheet A1 calls for the removal and relocation of the existing electrical panel. Electrical Demolition Plan on Sheet E2 specifies that the existing panel is to remain. Keynote 5 on the Power Plan shows an existing sub-panel in a different location. Please clarify.
2. On the Electrical Power Plan it appears that SP-10 powers the Water Heater. The Panel Schedule shows Dining Room Receptacles on this circuit. Please clarify.
3. Provide an electrical circuit for the Water Heater.
4. Provide the power requirements for the Water Heater on the Plumbing drawings.
5. On the Electrical Power Plan it appears that SP-14 powers Receptacles. The Panel Schedule shows a Washing Machine on this circuit. Please clarify.
6. On the Electrical Power Plan it appears that SP-16 powers Receptacle. The Panel Schedule shows a line-t0-line load on this circuit. Please clarify.
7. It appears that Panel SP does not apply to this location, or any commercial location. No further circuits on this panel will be reviewed until this has been corrected.
8. On the Electrical Power Plan it appears that MP-4 powers an interior receptacle. The Panel Schedule shows existing Roof Mounted Receptacles on this circuit. Please clarify.
9. On the Electrical Power Plan it appears that MP-6 powers two interior receptacles. The Panel Schedule shows this circuit as a spare. Please clarify.
10. On the Electrical Power Plan it appears that MP-8 powers two interior receptacles. The Panel Schedule shows this circuit as a spare. Please clarify.
11. No further circuits on panel MP will be reviewed until comments above are corrected.
12. Outdoor Lighting Calculation refers to types A and B. Only Type M is seen on the plans.
13. Outdoor Lighting Calculation identifies all exterior fixtures as HPS. Luminaire Schedule on Sheet E1 specifies that Fixture M is CFL.
14. Provide catalogue cut sheets for all exterior lighting fixtures.
15. It is doubtful that this location is in Lighting Area E2. Please justify.
16. Reference Single Line Diagram. New Panelboard is to be single phase. Panel MP is 3 phase according to the panel schedule.
17. Reference Single Line Diagram. New Panelboard has a 400A MCB. Panel MP has a 200A MCB according to the panel schedule.
18. Reference Single Line Diagram. The ampacity of 4/0 conductor is 230A, not protected by a 400 AF.
19. Reference Single Line Diagram. Eliminate the redundant ground between the CT Can and the Disconnect Switch.
01/25/2007 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEEDS 8TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION
02/02/2007 CHRISTY FOREMAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS

DATE: 2/1/07
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM06535
PROJECT NAME: FARMERS INSURANCE REMODELING
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1131 N. COUNTRY CLUB
ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: ALFONSO GASELUM
PROJECT REVIEWER: CHRISTY FOREMAN


TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CHRISTY.FOREMA1@TUCSONAZ.GOV IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1) Per structural calculations ½" OSB sheathing with 8d nails @ 6"/12" is specified please specify on details.
2) Per structural calculations 3/8" OSB on studs with 8d nails @ 6"/12" on lines E & F same on line B & C please specify on details.
3) Specify J-2 on sht. S1 / Roof Framing
4) Specify B-7 on roof framing per 12 of 22 of structural calculations at entry canopy.
5) Specify C-1 on framing plan per 13 of 22 of structural calculations.
6) Specify masonry pier height, beam bearing height, and ceiling height to clarify justified column height.
7) Foundation plan S1 and details do not match south entry. Calculations specify #5 transverse bars @12" o.c. and drawings specify #5 @ 16" o.c.
8) Dimension shown on foundation plan do not match dimensions on structural calculations pg 21 of 22. Please clarify.
9) Dimension grade change at north entry.
10) Clarify breakroom height work surface complies with section 902.3 ANSI 2003 A117.1.
11) Clarify you have a clear 5'-0" turning space in restroom area. Turning radius shall be clear of door swings. See ANSI A117.1 2003.
12) Revise hardware general notes - note 4 to comply with City of Tucson codes.
13) Clarify / justify south wall per table 602 for separation distance less than 10 feet. Clarify / justify openings for table 704.8.
14) Provide a section clarifying ramp requirements per ANSI A117.1 2003 section 405 and 505.
15) 1997 Uniform Administrative Code - section 302.5 Inspection and Observation Program. When special inspection is required by Section 306, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The inspection program shall designate the portions of the work to have special inspection, the name or names of the individuals or firms who are to perform the special inspections and indicate the duties of the special inspectors.

The special inspector shall be employed by the owner, the engineer or architect of record, or an agent of the owner, but not the contractor or any other person responsible for the work.

When structural observation is required by Section 307, the inspection program shall name the individuals or firms who are to perform structural observation and describe the stages of construction at which structural observation is to occur.

The inspection program shall include samples of inspection reports and provide time limits for submission of reports.
02/06/2007 SUZANNE BOHNET ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building permit can be approved once Site Plan is approved.
12/29/2006 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/02/2007 FSANCHE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
04/02/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed