Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM06431
Parcel: 107020220

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T06CM06431
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/01/2007 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/01/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
02/01/2007 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Needs Review Site inspection in process
02/02/2007 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T06CM06431
3207 N. Freeway Industrial Loop
Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL: 02/06/07

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS 2-02.2.1.4 A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the site plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately
one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the
following information.
1. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets, railroads and watercourses.
2. Section, township, and range; section corners; and the scale will be labeled.

2. DS 2-02.2.1.6 Per LUC Sec. 3.2.5.2.I the wall indicated on the site plan as being an 8' wall on top of a 2' retaining wall must meet the setback requirements for a structure. The required setbacks for this parcel is 21' or the height of the structure from the nearest edge of travel lane, whichever is greater. Per the paving plan for this subdivision there is not a parking lane on the west side of the street, therefore the edge of pavement is the edge of the nearest travel lane. Provide a dimension from the wall to the edge of pavement meeting the required setback.

3. DS 2-02.2.1.8 The parking spaces indicated along the south property line will require wheel stops or barricades, per DS 3-05.2.3.C, to prevent damage from occurring to the fence. Provide a dimensioned detail indicating the required 2'6" distance as per DS 3-05 Figure 5, if wheel stops are used. If a sidewalk is used as a barrier (see later comment) clearly indicate the over hang and the minimum 4' clearance for a sidewalk.

Provide a detail and location of the required handicap parking signage. The minimum distance from grade to the bottom of the sign per City of Tucson standards is 7'-0".

4. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide a detail of the class one bicycle parking enclosures. See DS 2-09.5.5 and figure one.

Bicycle parking spaces and access aisle must be separated from vehicular use areas. See DS 2-09.5.6

Provide a dimensioned detail clearly indicating the required access aisle width and parking space area for the class one bicycle parking provided. See DS 2-09.5.2 and figure 9.

5. DS 2-02.2.1.12 An accessible pedestrian circulation path (raised sidewalk) is required from any adjacent street connecting to the bicycle parking spaces and the vehicle parking spaces. See DS 2-08.3.1 Provide handicap ramp at the access aisle for the handicap parking space. Provide a detail of the handicap ramp including required truncated domes.

6. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide the location, size, type and height of existing or proposed signage including billboards.

7. DS 2-02.2.1.20 As per the final plat there is a 10' PUE along the street side of the property. It appears to have been drawn in but has not been labeled. Provide docket and page for this easement also.

8. DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide any existing or proposed lighting type and layout.

9. DS 2-02.2.1.31 As per the letter from W. Bogdan, the use for this project is Commercial Storage not General Manufacturing as listed. List the proposed use as follows: "Commercial Storage "34" subject to: 3.5.10.1."

10. DS 2-02.2.2. List the proposed FAR as 0.00 per letter from Wayne Bogdan dated January 11,2007. (attach a copy of the letter to the site plan)

11. Depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments, additional comments may be forth coming.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.

TLS C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T06CM06431.doc
02/06/2007 TERRY STEVENS ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied see zoning comments
02/12/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
02/28/2007 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: March 1, 2007
SUBJECT: Border Products Storage Yard Site Plan- Engineering Review
TO: Tim Puntenney
LOCATION: 3207 N Freeway Industrial Loop, T13S R13E Sec27, Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T06CM06431


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan, preliminary grading plan, and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The preliminary grading plan was not reviewed for Development Standard (DS) Section 11-01, grading compliance. The site plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments:


DRAINAGE REPORT:

1) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.2.D: Provide the Master Drainage Report for Freeway Industrial Park (Book 54, Page 018) showing any conditions for Phases development. The Master Drainage Report should show a future drainage scheme that takes into account the retention requirements for this property. If the retention requirements have not been satisfied a revised drainage report with calculations and retention basin design for 5-year threshold retention is required for the proposed project.

2) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Provide a geotechnical report with building setbacks from existing channel, infiltration rates for retention basin, and slope stability recommendations for channel design, slope stability, and proposed spillway riprap. Clarify if Master Drainage Report and approved geotechnical report address these comments.

3) DS Sec. 10-02.2.3.1.6.4.a: Revise the channel cross-section on the preliminary grading plan to meet recommendations within the drainage report and geotechnical report. The channel bottom must have a 0.5% slope to assure positive drainage to any existing drainage structure. Provide flow arrows on the site plan and grading plan.

4) DS Sec.10-2.2.3.1.5.B: Provide calculations with riprap designs for the proposed riprap spillway at the channel. The detail must show dimensions, riprap sizing, thickness, method of placement, filter fabric, and any geotechnical recommendations.


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.2: Provide the Book and Page number for Freeway Industrial Park on the revised site plan under the Project Data section.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the project location map to identify conditions within one square mile fo the subject property. Specifically label the railroad tracks, provide the location map to scale (3 miles=1") provide the section corners on the location map with the Township, Range and Section referenced.

7) DS 2-02.2.1.8 & DS 3-05.2.3.C: Revise the parking spaces along the south property line to include the required wheel stops or barricades to prevent damage from occurring to the fence. Provide a dimensioned detail indicating the required 2.5-foot distance as per DS 3-05 Figure 5, if wheel stops are used. If a sidewalk or vertical curb is used as a barrier clearly indicate the over hang and the minimum 4' clearance for a sidewalk.

8) DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C & TAMG Sec.5.5: Depict and label 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all proposed driveway entrances along Freeway Industrial Loop. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the site plan.

9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify that the minimum 30-foot dimensions shown for the driveway access points are maintained with the proposed gates. Refer to Tucson Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-39 for driveway and curb cut requirements.

10) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Provide the required 5-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of Freeway Industrial Loop. All new development shall provide 5-foot wide sidewalks along the entire length of street frontage. Refer to DS Sec.3-01 for all curb and sidewalk requirements. If a sidewalk already exist along the frontage of Freeway Industrial Loop as shown on the proposed site plan provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 5-foot sidewalk will be required.

11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Clarify on the site plan that all handicap ramps at crosswalks or at the transition of a pedestrian circulation area to a vehicular use area has the required detectable warning devices (truncated domes) per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13.

12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Provide the Master Drainage Report for the subject parcel to verify that 5-year threshold retention has been addressed. If 5-year threshold retention was not addressed provide a drainage report with retention calculations and basin design. The proposed site plan must match the requirements within the drainage report and geotechnical report.

13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Revise the site plan to call out the 100-year water surface elevation within the existing channel. The WSEL must match the Master Drainage or proposed Drainage Report.

14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide flow arrows and locations for all roof down spouts on the site plan. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations. Provide a Drainage Report with calculations and scupper details stating that the 10-year flow will be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all concentrated locations.

15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide flow arrows on the revised site plan showing drainage pattern for all flows within PAALs, channel inlet and outlet.

16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide the details and dimension for the channel curb openings inlet into the existing channel on the revised site plan. The detail must match the requirements in the drainage report and the recommendation within the geotechnical report.

17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.18: Provide the dimensions and recordation information in plan view for I-10 Frontage Road (Casa Grande Ave).

18) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Provide the recordation information on the site plan for Casa Grande Avenue along with the applicable existing right-of-way width.

19) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Revise the site plan to call out existing and proposed curbs along the frontage of Freeway Industrial Loop. Call out existing curbing, i.e. wedge curb or vertical curb.

20) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide dimensions for refuse container, show or label gates or doors for trash enclosures. The enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Specifically bollards need to be installed at the rear of the proposed container enclosure.

21) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a General Note stating that all walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments.


GRADING PLAN:

22) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: If applicable provide a grading permit application for this project. If retention requirements and basin design have to be addressed provide revised cut and fill quantities and submit a grading plan application and drainage report with basin design and calculations for grading plan review.

23) DS Sec. 11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise the riprap spillway detail on Sheet C2.0 to include dimensions, riprap sizing, thickness, method of placement, and filter fabric. Provide within the drainage report or a separate drainage statement the riprap calculations and detail requirements.

24) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.6: Provide a detail for Keynote #5. Show the dimensions, thickness and geotechnical recommendations for all pavement design.

25) Revise Keynote #9 to correctly label the intended use or remove Keynote call #9 form plan view.

26) Revise Keynote #4 call out that is shown in plan view. Specifically the call out that is pointing towards an existing topo line.


STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to the following comment:

27) CGP Part IV.C.1: Provide a signed copy of the Pollution Prevention Plan Certifications within the revised SWPPP.

28) CGP Part IV.C.1: Identify all operators for the project and the areas over which each operator has control. Provide the contact information for the property owner, including telephone number and address.

29) CGP Part IV.C.2.a: Describe the project and its intended use after Notice Of Intent (NOT) is filed.

30) CGP Part IV.C.2.b: Describe the intended sequence of disturbance activities.

31) CGP Part IV.C.2.c: Indicate the total area of site and estimate of total area expected to be disturbed.

32) CGP Part IV.C.2.d: Clarify on the post coefficient the word "PAUNG."

33) CGP Part IV.C.2.e: Revise the location map to scale showing section corners and Township, Range and Section legal description.

34) CGP Part IV.C.3: Provide the Civil Engineer's Arizona registration seal and signature on the SWPPP Exhibit.

35) CGP Part IV.C.3.b: Revise the SWPPP Exhibit to dimension and label all areas of soil disturbance.

36) CGP Part IV.C.3.c: Revise the SWPPP Exhibit to identify non-stormwater discharge controls around the designated washout area.

37) CGP Part IV.C.4: Revise the SWPPP Exhibit to identify the nearest receiving watercourse that the stormwater is discharged into downstream.

38) CGP Part IV.D.1: Provide under the Stormwater Control section which operator is responsible for the control measure's implementation.

39) CGP Part IV.D.2.b: Describe the selection, installation and maintenance of BMPs per manufacturers' specifications and good engineering practices, including procedures for modifying or replacing BMPs if one is found to be ineffective or installed incorrectly.

40) CGP Part IV.D.2.c: Describe the practice and schedule to routinely remove offsite accumulation of sediment routinely.

41) CGP Part IV.D.3: Describe good housekeeping procedures to be used (prevent litter, debris and chemicals from being exposed to sw).

42) CGP Part IV.D.4.c: Describe record keeping efforts, include forms/checklists used for keeping the required data.

43) CGP Part IV.D.4.c.i: Maintain records of the dates when major-grading activities occurred.

44) CGP Part IV.D.4.c.ii: Maintain records of when construction activities cease (temporarily or permanently).

45) CGP Part IV.D.4.c.iii: Maintain records of when stabilization is initiated and completed and any reason for delays.

46) CGP Part IV.D.5.a.i: Describe the location, size and retention capacity of the drainage basin and the areas that drain into them.

47) CGP Part IV.D.5.a.iii: For a drainage area of < 10 disturbed acres, describe how and where smaller sediment basins or sediment traps are used along with silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or alternatives on all side slope boundaries OR Describe how and where a sediment basin with storage for a 2yr, 24hr storm per disturbed acre drained will be used OR Describe how and where a sediment basin with 3600 ft3 of storage per disturbed acre drained will be used.

48) CGP Part IV.D.5.b: Describe where and what type of velocity dissipation devices will be used at discharge locations and along outfall channel.

49) CGP Part IV.D.6: Confirm in the narrative whether structural measures comply with local or state stormwater management requirements.

50) CGP Part IV.D.7: Identify all allowable sources of non-sw discharges except for flows from fire-fighting activities

a) Describe how all non-sw discharges will be eliminated or reduced to the extent feasible;

b) Describe how BMPs will be implemented for non-sw discharges;

c) If superchlorinated wastewaters will be generated, describe how they will be dechlorinated or held on site until chlorine levels have dissipated, unless used for firefighting.

51) CGP Part IV.D.8.c: Describe the location and type of all construction and waste materials stored on site (Update SWPPP as necessary).

52) CGP Part IV.D.8.d: Describe pollutant sources from areas other than construction (including sw discharges from dedicated asphalt plants and concrete plants).

53) CGP Part IV.F: Include a copy of the signed NOI and the ADEQ authorization number (if available) as part of the SWPPP.

54) CGP Part IV.G: Describe whether SWPPP is consistent with federal, state, or local soil and erosion control or stormwater management requirements.

55) CGP Part IV.H.1: Describe routine inspection schedule and procedures to ensure BMPs are functional and SWPPP is being implemented.

a) Indicate if the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 7 calendar days OR

b) Indicate if the inspection frequency is to be at least once every 14 days and also within 24 hours of the end of each storm event of $0.5 inches.

56) CGP Part IV.H.3: Indicate who the qualified personnel will be to perform inspections and describe the persons' qualifications.

57) CGP Part IV.H.4: Describe all areas to be inspected including all disturbed areas of site, and areas used to store materials exposed to precipitation.

a) Describe inspection procedures how inspectors will look for evidence of, or potential for, pollutants entering drainage system.

b) Describe in inspection procedures how inspectors will observe sedimentation and erosion control measures.

c) Describe inspection procedures and how inspectors will look at accessible discharge points, and ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective.

d) Describe in inspection procedures how inspectors will look at nearby stream downstream locations when discharge points are inaccessible.

e) Describe in inspection procedures how inspectors will look for sediment tracking at entrances and exits.

f) Describe how inspectors will document all findings and what the inspection form will look like.

58) CGP Part IV.H.5: Describe how inspectors will complete an inspection report for each inspection that includes inspection date; name, title and qualifications of each qualified person making the inspection; weather information for period since last inspection; location of discharges of sediment or other pollutants; list of BMPs that need to be maintained, failed to operate or prove inadequate; list of additional needed BMPs; corrective actions required; sources of all non-sw and control measures; and materials storage areas with evidence of pollutant discharge.

59) CGP Part IV.H.6: Describe how and where the inspection records will be maintained for at least three years; how the report will document noncompliance or certify full compliance; and indicate who will be authorized to sign the report.

60) CGP Part IV.H.7: Describe how the SWPPP will be modified when needed, within 7 calendar days of inspection. BMPs must be modified or added before next storm event or as soon as practicable.

61) CGP Part IV.I.1: Describe how the SWPPP will be modified within 15 business days after change in design, construction, operation or maintenance at site that has a significant effect on discharge or not previously addressed in SWPPP.

62) CGP Part IV.I.2: Describe how the SWPPP will be modified within 15 business days if it is determined that discharge is causing or contributing to WQ exceedances OR SWPPP is ineffective.

63) CGP Part IV.J.1: Provide the signature for the owner and operator for the SWPPP certification.

64) CGP Part IV.J.1: Provide a General Note to describe how and where the required copy of the SWPPP will be retained on site.

65) CGP Part IV.J.2: Describe how and where the operator will post a sign at the main entrance to the site containing: AZPDES authorization number, construction site contact name and telephone number, brief description, location of SWPPP. See the enclosed, green AZPDES Posting Requirements form enclosed in the package.

66) CGP Part VII.L.5.a: Add a note to the SWPP plan cover sheet stating that the operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours:
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1)
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Office: 602-771-4466
Fax 602-771-4505

A SWPPP Checklist outlining the City of Tucson submittal requirements is included.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide the Master Drainage Report, a revised site plan, a Geotechnical Report and a revised SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, SWPPP, Master Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report reviews. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference.

For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189.


Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
03/08/2007 SREEVES1 ADA REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/19/2007 FSANCHE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/19/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed