Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T06CM06354
Parcel: 117072260

Address:
747 S 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T06CM06354
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/09/2007 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/29/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Comments
03/29/2007 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. All streets including Arizona Ave. are required to have landscaping and appropriate plant cover.

2. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I

3. A 5' wall is required to screen residential properties from vehicle use area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

4. A 6' wall is required to screen loading zone from Speedway Blvd per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

5. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.

6. Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants.

7. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed

8. Additional comments may apply.
03/29/2007 SSHIELD1 ADA REVIEW Passed
03/29/2007 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 5-POINTS GATEWAY PLAZA
T06CM06354
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 28, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance.

2. A Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) review is required for this project.

3. Add a note to the plan stating "THIS SITE PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES, Sec. 2.8.3 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE" and "Sec 2.8.8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ)

4. All lettering and dimension shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The dimensions shown on the plan do not meet the minimum twelve-point size.

5. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, identify conditions within the square mile area, such section corners.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide lot dimensions and bearings on the plan.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the height of the existing building on the plan.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B the street setbacks for Sixth Avenue, Eighteenth Street and Arizona Avenue are 21 feet or the height of the building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of existing curb.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.2 provide a 'C' SPACE DEPTH dimension for the angled parking proposed along the north side of the proposed building.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5 provide the maximum allowed surface slope for the parking space and access aisle on the handicapped vehicle parking space detail.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Detail 4/A0.01 dimension for the height of the sign is incorrect. This dimension is 7'-0' from the bottom of the sign to finished grade. See attached.

13. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 Provide the location of the main entrance of the building. Per D.S. 2-09.4.1 the Class 2 parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that have entrances.

14. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 Per D.S. 2-09.5.0 provide a plan view of the Class 2 bicycle parking that shows the required dimensions.

15. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 Provide a detail for Class 1 off-street bicycle parking; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required.

16. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.10 Zoning acknowledges that the existing sight visibility triangles (SVT's) are shown on the site plan. Remove the future SVT's and reference to future right of way (ROW). Based on the current MS&R map Sixth Avenue is at future width.

17. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.5 the proposed parking along Eighteenth Street will need to be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the site plan.

18. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Provide dimensions for the width of all proposed sidewalks. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

19. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.C a four (4) foot sidewalk is required between the proposed angled parking and the proposed building.

20. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Clarify how the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route is functioning at the northwest corner of the proposed building. It appears that an area of sidewalk within the ROW appears to be flush with the pavement.

21. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 On detail 7/A0.01 the detectable warning devices (truncated domes) are not shown correctly. See ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13.1

22. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards.

23. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.14 Clearly delineate the maneuvering area for the loading zone on the plan.

24. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.18 Label Sixth Avenue as an MS&R Route.

25. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.19 Provide ROW dimension for all named streets and alleys.

26. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

27. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 Provide dimensions from all proposed curbs to street monument lines.

28. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting

29. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Label the zoning for the adjacent parcel to the north.

30. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 The PROPOSED USE is listed as OFFICE, RETAIL. The parking calculation references RESTAURANT please clarify the proposed use or uses. This said List the proposed use/uses as 'ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE "34", GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "34" SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.A, FOOD SERVICE "33" SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.4.6.C'.

31. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 List the GROSS LOT AREA.

32. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 there appears to be a discrepancy in the proposed building square footage. Under "BUILDINGS (GFA)" the total listed for the proposed building is 8190 Sq. Ft. Under the "PARKING REQUIRED" the total building square footage only adds up to 6642 Sq. Ft., please clarify.

33. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 List the 'ALLOWED FLOOR AREA RATIO' and the 'PROVIDED FLOOR AREA RATIO'.

34. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Remove all references to "LOT COVERAGE" from the plan, Per LUC Sec. 3.2.3.2.B Development Designators "33" & "34" lot coverage is not applicable.

35. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Until the proposed building square footage is clarified, see comment 32, the required parking cannot be verify. The required parking calculation will include coming.

36. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Revise the bicycle parking calculation to include "REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.3.5 the required bicycle parking is based on the number of provided vehicle parking spaces. This said if a variance is granted for the provided parking spaces, the required number of bicycle parking spaces would be two (2). Also per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.8.A the two (2) required bicycle parking spaces maybe all Class 2.

37. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 provide the number of 'REQUIRED' and 'PROVIDE' loading spaces.

38. I D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 The 'EXPANSION' calculation is not correct, revise.

39. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

40. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\site\t06cm06354.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
03/30/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants.
04/05/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003.
2. Revise the site drawing to show the location and size of both the water meter(s) serving the new building along with the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
3. Revise the site drawing to show the location of the public sewer and the proposed point of connection for the building sewer. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
4. Revise the site drawing to show the location of the new building sewer and the existing building sewer along with the proposed points of connection for the building sewers. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
04/06/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: April 9, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM06254
PROJECT NAME: 5-Points Gateway Plaza
PROJECT ADDRESS: 747 South 7th Avenue
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN

APPROVED: DRAIANGE STATEMENT

1. Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D. Include the Section with the Town and Range. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets. Show the section lines and label. The lettering shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4.

2. Provide dimensions and bearings for the boundary of the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5.

3. Per the Major Street and Route Plan (Map) 6th Avenue is built to the future ROW width, consequently future sight visibility triangles are not required. Remove the future SVTs from the street frontage of 6th Avenue. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10.

4. Provide the required SVTs for the southeast corner of the property (the northwest corner of Arizona Avenue and 18th Street). DS 2-02.2.1.A.10.

5. The door of the solid waste enclosure obstructs the one way 13' travel lane. Revise the site plan to have the travel lane a minimum 12' free from obstruction. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11.

6. A street may not be used for maneuvering from a parking space. The City Engineer from the Department of Transportation must approve the parking spaces proposed along 18th Street. LUC 3.3.7.5.

7. Pedestrian circulation (sidewalks) must connect all public areas of the development to the sidewalk within the ROW. It is not clear on the plan where sidewalks are located or if sidewalks are proposed or existing. Sidewalks have not been called out on the plan view. Revise the site plan to show all existing and/or proposed sidewalks within the development and the ROW. Label and dimension appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A12.

8. Sidewalk is required between the angled parking spaces and the structure. Provide a 4' sidewalk in the required area. DS 2-08.4.1.C., D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12

9. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps or at any area where the sidewalk is flush with the asphalt. It appears that a curb access ramp with detectable warnings has not been provided on the south side of the one-way ingress. Clarify on the plan view what is proposed in this area and provide the required information. ICC/ANSI
A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13 D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12.

10. Provide general drainage patterns for the site. Indicate any used symbols in the legend. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

11. Provide finish grades throughout the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

12. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17.

13. Provide the recordation information (book and page) for both streets and indicate the streets are public. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18.

14. Delineate on the plan the maneuvering area for the loading space. The minimum requirement for a 30' single unit vehicle is an outside radius of 42' and inside radius of 28'. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

15. Dimension from street centerline of 6th Ave to the existing curb and sidewalk location. Label appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21.

16. Dimension from the street centerline of Arizona Ave. and 18th Street the ROW and to the curb and sidewalk location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21.

17. Graphically show all easements with recordation data on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20.

18. Provide existing contours not exceeding two feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent with Bench Mark based on the City of Tucson datum; include the book and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23.

19. Solid waste enclosures must be placed so that the collection vehicle does not back out into the ROW and into moving traffic. Arizona Ave is a public street and the current location of the solid waste vehicle does not meet minimum standards. Revise the site plan to meet the minimum standards for a solid waste accommodations. DS 6-01.4.1.I.

20. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/11/2007 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed