Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM06337
Parcel: 119044130

Address:
3504 S BELMAR AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING-WALKTHRU

Permit Number - T06CM06337
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING-WALKTHRU
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/20/2007 CAGUILA1 NPPO REVIEW Needs Review
02/20/2007 CAGUILA1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review
02/20/2007 CAGUILA1 BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Needs Review
12/19/2006 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD Zoning Review Transmittal
FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: (Activity Number) T06CM06337
(Address) 3504 E Belmar Av
(Use) SFR: Additions: carport, dining room, front porch, bedroom

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12-19-06

COMMENTS:

1. The proposed site is in a R-2 zone. The use is Family Dwelling with Development Designator "I" subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.7.1.F. Development Designator "I" per LUC Sec. 3.2.3.1.B has a perimeter yard indicator of AA. The required perimeter yard setbacks per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 for a perimeter yard indicator AA with adjacent zoning of R-2 is 6' or 2/3 the height of the structure which ever is greater. The required street perimeter yard setback per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.A is 20' or 11/2 times the height of the structure.

2. The existing detached accessory storage building located in the southwest corner of the property, per the above listed codes, requires a minimum of 6' setback from the south and the west property line. Owner proposes a setback of 1'-7" from the south property line and 1'-7" from the west property line.

3. The existing detached accessory ramada located near the southwest corner of the property, per the above listed codes, requires a minimum 6' setback from the south property line. Owner proposes a 2'-0" setback from the south property line.

4. The proposed dining room addition located near the southeast corner of the property, per the above listed codes, requires a minimum setback 0f 6'-0" from the south property line. Owner proposes a setback of 5'-0" from the south property line.

5. The proposed porch (covered walkway) located in the street perimeter yard setback at the east property line requires a minimum setback of 20'-0" from the east property line. Owner proposes a 0'-0" setback from the east property line.

6. The proposed carport located along the north property line requires a minimum setback from the north property line of 7'-7". Owner proposes a 1'-0" setback from the north property line.

7. Based on the information provided on this site plan a Design Development Option (DDO) is required for the setbacks listed in item #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.