Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM06322
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/02/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 2, 2007 SUBJECT: Site Plan and Grading Plan Lot 176- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Baker and Associates Engineering, Inc. LOCATION: 2111 E Valencia Road; T15S R14E Sec08, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Patricia Gilbert for Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM06322 (Site Plan) and T06BU02936 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: It is acknowledge that the 1-foot no access easement is in the recordation process, the docket and page of the easement must be shown on the site plan prior to approval. The above comment is from the first review and still applies. The response to this comment was a request to put the recordation data on the mylar. This is a site plan review and submittal of mylars is not a Development Services requirement. Recordation data must be on the site plan. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval. 2) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: On the plan view, within the basin for design criteria of the weir opening (detail 2) and curb/wall openings (detail 3) references details do not match the subject. Detail 2 and detail 3 are for typical parking stalls. Revise appropriately. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP is approvable once the grading plan is approved. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan (3 copies) and 3 copies of the SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Be advised due to the fact there are only two comments outstanding an over the counter review can be conducted by Jason Green (837-4929) or Patricia Gilbert (837-4936) |
| 06/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/11/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department - Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: T06CM06322 2111 E. Valencia Road, new Industrial complex Commercial site plan, 3rd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter - or contact me for an appointment to review the changes over the counter. 1. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9, re: bike parking: class 2 bike parking must be within 50' of building entrance (DS 2-09). show entrance, dimension distance to bike parking. RESPONSE: A) class 2 bike parking does not appear to be within 50' from an entrance on building 1. B) Correct bike parking calculation to show separate ratio for industrial uses vs. commercial (i.e. 104 parking spaces for commercial requires 8% of 104 spaces, = 8 spaces - all class 2,- do same for industrial) and provide correct number of each. Please disperse class 2 to each building, like class 1 provided. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, show width of Parking Area Access Lanes/entrances. RESPONSE: Please put angle of parking spaces back onto site plan. I see detail 3 shows 70 degrees, but the PAAL and parking space widths don't match the site plan - correct. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14 - loading zones: A) The Zoning Administrator issued an email May 16, 2007 stating loading zones at 12x50 should be provided for each building. The Zoning Administrator's corrected advisement requires loading zone size of 12x55 for all 4 spaces. Please revise. B) The Zoning Administrator advised a 5 foot wide striped pedestrian refuge area was permitted for pedestrian access, providing the refuge leads from the loading zone to loading doors of the building the loading zone serves. Provide an elevation for sides of buildings facing interior court - or call out doors on the site - to ensure doors don't swing into loading zones and loading access to the buildings are at reasonable distance. 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, I see two 1' wide No Vehicular Access Easements. Please clarify their locations, their docket and page when recorded. RESPONSE: Thank you for the explanation of the NVAE locations, please provide their docket and page information when recorded. (STILL NEEDED or remove NVAE) 5. I see a number 3 called out for truncated domes on ramps on sheet 2, where are the keynotes listed? 5. Please note further review comments may be forthcoming, depending on responses provided. I can be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T06CM06322 2111 e valencia 3.doc |
| 06/11/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | The handicapped accessibility on the plan meets code requirements, the "denial status" is just a reminder to the reviewer to place the handicapped parking approval stamp on the plan once the site plan has been approved. |
| 06/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/13/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |