Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM06306
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. Street landscape border is required 2. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 4. A 10' interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 6. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 9-06. Thevetia peruviana is not on the list choose appropriate plant material 7. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 8. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from all residential and office zoned properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. All walls required by this Division must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco or textured finish 9. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Verify entire site meets canopy tree requirement 10. Landscaping along parking lots where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B 11. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. 12. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 13. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 14. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/04/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. |
| 01/17/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 18, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM06306 PROJECT NAME: Interior Trends Office PROJECT ADDRESS: 3227 North Palo Verde Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4. 2. Provide a legend to the plan indicating different line type, shading, etc. 3. Provide bearings for all boundary dimensions. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5. 4. The minimum width for a PAAL is 24' for a two way travel lane. The PAAL located just north of the building is not meeting the minimum requirement for a two way travel lane. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11., DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 5. A minimum of a two foot setback is required between a wall and a PAAL. Provide the required 2' setback on the north side of the property. Please refer to Zoning comment number 8. When an existing development can not meet the minimum requirements for a Development Standard an alternative is to apply for a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). Please contact Patricia Gehlen, the Community Design Review Committee Manager for information regarding this process, 791-5550 extension 1179. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3. 6. A minimum distance of 1' must be maintained between any open structure and a PAAL. The north side of the front structure does not meet this minimum requirement. Revise the plan to meet the minimum requirement. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3. 7. A minimum setback of 5' must be maintained between a PAAL and a structure for pedestrian refuge. The 5' pedestrian refuge area must provide a 4' sidewalk with a 1' separation between the curb and sidewalk. Revise the site plan to meet this standard. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1., DS 2-08.4.B. 8. Show the loading vehicle maneuverability for the required loading space. The minimum requirements for a 30' single unit vehicle is an outside radius of 42' and inside radius of 28'. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 9. There are arrows provided on the site plan, however it is not clear what the arrows are indicating. It appears the arrows are indicating drainage patterns, if this assumption is correct please provide the symbol in the legend. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 10. Cut and fill quantities are required information on a site plan. This office acknowledges this is an existing site with proposed work within the parking area and cut and fill quantities is probably zero. If the cut and fill quantities equal zero indicate on the plan with a general note. If there is actually cut and fill quantities for this project indicate amount in cubic yards on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 11. Indicate if Palo Verde is a public or private road and provide recordation data (book and page) adjacent to the street label. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 12. It is not clear what the 19' dimension is depicting that is located within Palo Verde Avenue. Dimensions within the ROW must be labeled accordingly. Underneath the verbiage "Palo Verde Ave," there is notation of a 60' ROW. The 19' dimension appears to be from property line to property line. After reviewing an aerial on the Transportation Department Map Site the full ROW width appears to be 60. Clarify in detail in the response letter and on the map view. 13. Show all easements of record (book and page) graphically on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 14. Dimension from the street centerline of Palo Verde to the existing curb and sidewalk location. If Palo Verde does not have curb, dimension from street centerline to the edge of pavement. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 15. Provide the datum used for the contours shown on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 16. Provide in the legend the symbol used for grades. Indicate if the grades are spot elevations or finish grades (pavement/asphalt). DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 17. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. 18. Commercial developments must provide on site centralized on-site refuse storage. A refuse storage facility has not been provided. Indicate refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability. Refuse vehicles require 36' inside radius and 50' outside radius. Any proposal not meeting Development Standard 6-01, will require a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR). Please contact Patricia Gehlen, Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Manager for DSMR submittal criteria. 19. Dimension from the street or alley monument line(s) to existing overhead electric lines (and label accordingly) where potential conflict exists with dumpster service/access (DS 6-01.4.1 & B 2-02.2.1 A 21). 20. Grading, hydrology, landscape islands and borders are to be integrated in effort to make maximum use of stormwater runoff for supplemental irrigation purposes. Landscape islands and borders must provide water harvesting from the vehicle use area and the rooftops. Small curb opening must be provided to accept the surface stormwater. Revise the site plan to meet this criteria. LUC 3.7.4.3.B. 21. Show the drainage of drainage on the roof of each structure. DS 2-02.2.1.A17. |
| 12/19/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Buildings are too far from fire hydrant for commercial use. Seee IFC Section 508 as amended. |
| 12/21/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Interior Trends Office T06CM06306 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 26, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). 2. Zoning acknowledges the receipt of a letter from Frank S. Bangs, Jr. with Lewis and Roca. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide lot bearings for all lot lines. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The setbacks shown on the plan are not correct. The required setback to adjacent O3 zoning is zero (0) feet. The required setback to adjacent MH1 zoning is 1 ½ the height of the building wall, based on the information provided of 11'-0" this setback would be 16'-6". The street setback is twenty (20) feet. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a typical parking space detail for both handicapped and standard vehicle parking spaces. 7. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 & D.S. 2-09.0 Provide off-street bicycle parking; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. 8. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.11 The parking area access lane (PAAL) located along the north property line does not meet the minimum requirement width of twenty-four (24) feet for a two-way PAAL D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.1 9. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Provide a two (2) foot minimum setback along the PAAL and the north property line. D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 10. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Provide a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area between the PAAL and the north courtyard wall. D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 This refuge will contain a minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk. 11. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.12 Clarify where the sidewalks are located. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 A pedestrian circulation/accessible route is required from the building to the property line along Palo Verde Ave. D.S. 2-08.3.1. The pedestrian circulation/accessible route is also required to connect the storage building to the front building. If a sidewalk is required along Palo Verde Ave. (see engineering comments) the pedestrian circulation/accessible route will need to connect to this sidewalk. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 What appears to be a sidewalk just south of the bicycle racks does not meet the minimum width of four (4) feet. D.S. 2-08.5.1.A 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The minimum width of a parking space is 8'-6" D.S. 3-05.0 Table 1. All parking spaces shown on the plan are 8'-0" wide. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The backup spurs shown on the east end of the existing storage building and at the south end of the western most parking do not meet the requirements of D.S. 3-05.2.2.D. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii and will have a minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided from the back of the spur to a wall. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The access to the single car garage encroaches in the to handicapped parking space minimum length of eighteen (18) feet. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 Per the letter provide by Frank S. Bangs, Jr., there will be no signage other than the building address. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5.5 one (1) twelve (12) foot by thirty-five (35) foot loading space is required, provide. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 The Palo Verde right-of-way appears to be incorrect. Based on the dimensions shown there is a half right-of-way of 14'-6". Under the street name 60 ft ROW is shown. Please clarify. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 If required by engineering show the proposed curb along Palo Verde Ave. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting. 22. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the plan. 23. D.S. 2-02.2.2.2 There appears to be a conflict between building square footage. List the building square footage out as 1st floor = ???, 2nd floor = ???, storage building =???, total building = ????. Additional comments may be forth coming. 24. D.S. 2-02.2.2.3 Per LUC Sec 3.2.3.2 Development Designator "30" Lot coverage is not applicable, remove from plan, provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation on the plan. 25. D.S. 2-02.2.2.4 Once the building square footage is clarified the required parking can be clarified. Based on the current information provided: 1-story 2535/200 = 12.67 2-story 838/250 = 3.35 Storage 833/200 = 4.16 Total required = 20.185 Total provided = 12 26. D.S. 2-02.2.2.4 Provide a bicycle parking calculations on the plan. 27. D.S. 2-02.2.2.5 Provide the number of loading zones required and provided on the plan. 28. D.S. 2-02.2.2.6 If the existing storage building was on the site prior to the office building being built provide a percent of building expansion calculation. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm06306.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 12/26/2006 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/26/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2007 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |