Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM06162
Parcel: 13621004E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T06CM06162
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2007 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference Section 104.2, IECC 2003.
3. Revise the energy code analysis, using the correct cooling/heating degree-days and the correct climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Reference Section 302.1, IECC 2003, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2003.
5. Show how adequate access (i.e. walkways from the access hatch to the rooftop equipment) is being provided for the equipment located on the roof. Reference Section 306.5, IMC 2003.
6. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain or gutter unless the roof drain or gutter terminates at or above grade in an area capable or absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference Section 307.2.1, IMC 2003, as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. Reference Section 606.1, IMC 2003.
8. Provide ASHRAE 62.1-2004 calculations supporting the outside air quantities scheduled for each rooftop unit. Reference Sections 106.3.1 and 403.2 (as amended by the City of Tucson), IMC 2003.
01/02/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved
01/16/2007 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Water Heater 1W-1 requires 120V power according to the Schedule on Sheet P001. Electrical provides 208V. Coordinate with Plumbing and clarify.
2. Baptistry Heater and Pump not documented on Plumbing and Mechanical Plans.
3. Feeder for Dimmer Rack, #1, has 130A ampacity. Not protected by a 200A circuit breaker.
4. The 2/0 GND, between the Utility Transformer and the Customer Switchgear, is redundant. Please eliminate.
5. Provide fault calculations. It appears that the AFC at Panels LP1, LPM1, and DR1 are 38,059A, 39,003A, and 26,739A, respectively, using current conductor sizes.
6. Please identify panel LP1 on Sheet E522.
7. Demonstrate compliance with the Tucson Lighting Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Tucson_Lighting_Code.pdf.
8. All poles over 20' in height require the submittal of details and calculations for the pole and foundation, generated and sealed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Arizona.
9. Provide a disconnecting means for the ceiling fans. Reference NEC 430 Part IX.
10. Demonstrate compliance with the 2003 IECC.
11. Provide the ampere and fault current rating of the dimmer rack. A catalogue cut sheet would be appreciated.
12. Provide overcurrent protection for the dimmer circuits.
13. It appears that Ckt LP1-8 is overloaded when 25% of continuous load is added. Note that this Ckt appears in two places on the lighting plan.
14. Please account for continuous load and largest motor in load calculations for feeders and service.
15. Clarify GFCI circuits for RTUs. Ckt LP1-51 is a 2-pole circuit. Account for the receptacle electrical loads on the panel schedule.
16. Provide electrical power for the Bi-Polar Ion Generators. Reference Sheet M001.
17. Specify the wiring methods for this installation. Compliance with NEC 518.4.
01/17/2007 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
01/18/2007 BETSY COTTLE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
01/19/2007 LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied January 17, 2007 CITY OF TUCSON - FIRST CHECK
Tucson Appl. No. T06CM06162
Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.001

Mr. Gordon Vernon
7500 E. Golf Links Road
Tucson, Arizona 85735


Re: Plan Review: Rincon Baptist Church – Structural Only Review
Address: 7500 E. Golf Links Road


Dear Mr. Vernon,

Bureau Veritas North America has completed a first review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson:

Plans: One (1) set of plans (46 sheets) dated March 15, 2005 by Antony C. Tsang.

Structural Calculations: Two (2) sets not dated by Bejun N. Anklesaria.

Soils Report: One (1) copy dated March 2, 20056 by Oleg B. Lysyj.



These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2003 IRC, 2003 IMC, 2002 NEC and 2003 IPC).

Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded.


Sincerely,

Bureau Veritas North America



Shelley Knuffke
ICC Plans Examiner








SK:pc s:/tucson\01007-161001.001pc1
enclosures


Re: Stories: One
Occupancy: A-3/IIA
Fire Sprinklers: Yes
Building Area (sq. ft.): 12,017 (commercial)


A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and referred to the 2003 International Building Code.

B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance.

C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.).

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

Provide a legible door and hardware schedule summary. Sheet A104.

Note and specify a complete roofing system. Specify roofing type, grades of materials, valley flashing material, and attachments for all roofing materials.

Specify type of design and construction of all walls. Note locations of all wall types on plan. IBC Chapter 23.

Indicate the size and span of headers and lintels in all bearing and non bearing walls. Indicate all post locations and sizes. 2003 IBC Chapters 23 and 24.

Provide manufacturers span charts and specs for all steel building elements.

Structural design calculations states use of 2000 IBC throughout. Must use 2003 IBC.

Indicate all braced wall panel locations specify the method of bracing to be used.

Provide complete floor and roof framing plans.

Provide accurate index.

Provide complete foundation plans with details.



If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Shelley Knuffke at (520) 576-8400 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M-F.
02/07/2007 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
12/22/2006 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Provide site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of the water meter and the size of the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
2. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
12/22/2006 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please add the following automatic sprinkler criteria to the plans:

1. The hazard classification of the occupancy including any special hazards.
2. The design standard to be used.
3. The availability and adequacy of the water supply. The fire line is not continued on the site plan.
4. The design density and the area of operation.
12/26/2006 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments.
3. Provide underground facility tracer wires per ARS 40-360.22.
4. Provide fixture descriptions (e.g. Manufacturer and model number) or material standards for all plumbing fixtures and the trap primers. Reference Section 401.1, UPC 2003.
5. Provide a design for the baptistery water circulation and heater. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
6. Provide back-siphonage protection for the baptistery. Reference Section 407.1, UPC 2003.
7. Provide information to show how the outlet temperature of the hot water is to be limited to 110 degrees at the washfountain SW-3. Reference Section 414.1, UPC 2003 and Section 804.3, IECC 2003.
8. "Waterless" urinals are not Code-compliant fixtures. Reference Sections 211.0, 406.2, 406.3, 601.1, and 1005.0, UPC 2003.
9. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the pressure reducing valve. Reference Sections A 3.3 and A 6.2, UPC 2003.
10. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2003.
11. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference Section 707.4, UPC 2003.
12. Provide a vent for each fixture trap. Reference Sections 901.0 and 910.1, UPC 2003.
13. The scupper width is too small to accommodate the design rainfall without exceeding a 2" depth of flow. Revise the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Reference Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.4, UPC 2003, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2003.
14. The design of the scupper box (detail 2/A111) ensures that in the event of a downspout blockage, the secondary overflow will also be blocked until it reaches a depth greater than 8 inches. Revise the design as required to meet the requirements of Section 1101.11.2.3, UPC 2003.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/09/2007 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/09/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed