Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM06084
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2007 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 23, 2007 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Division SUBJECT: 6464 E. Tanque Verde Rd. Lot Split Site Plan T06CM06084 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please provide a Drainage Statement and a response letter to the comments below along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan with your next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please label Tanque Verde as a Major Street & Route (MS&R). 2. Please label the width of the right-of-way (ROW) as existing, future or both or add a general note to that effect. 3. Please label all ROW curbs and sidewalks as existing, future or both or add a general note to that effect. 4. Please provide truncated domes for all new curb access ramps where the interface of the pavement or vehicle use area and the pedestrian area do not have a vertical separation. The area where the truncated domes are required is 6 inches back from the interface, a minimum 2 feet deep and extending the width of the interface. 5. Per the comment from Zoning, please correct the location of the loading zone so that both the loading zone and the trash dumpster have adequate maneuverability. 6. Keynotes 5, 10 and 11 are not called out on the Site Plan. Please review and revise as necessary. 7. Keynotes 6 and 9 appear to be transposed. Please review and revise as necessary. 8. Please include in Key Note 8 that the Rose Hill Wash is a W.A.S.H. Ordinance wash. 9. Please show the 50' W.A.S.H. study area on the Site Plan. Any new development in this area may require DSD Full Notice Procedure (Tucson Code Section 23A-51). Drainage Statement: 1) On the unnumbered sheet labeled "Shell Office Building", a line is identified as being the 50' Erosion Hazard Setback line. However, the Site Plan (Sheet SP-1) is indicating bank protection along the Rose Hill Wash. Please verify the presence and stability of the indicated bank protection to determine whether an erosion hazard setback is necessary, adequately dimensioned and/or augmented by additional erosion protection measures as necessary. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Associate (520) 791-5550 x1188 office Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/01/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide seal on office building page. Provide dimensions and radius locations for fire access to rear building. All portions must be within 150 feet of fire lane. Show hydrant locations. All portions of building must be within 300 feet of a hydrant. See IFC Chapter 5. Automatic fire sprinklers may substitute for some requirements. |
| 12/07/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T06CM06084 6464 E. Tanque Verde Site-Parking Lot Restripe---Lot Split TRANSMITTAL: 12/11/06 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan is being reviewed as a parking lot restripe in conjunction with the approval for a lot split. If there is an approved parking lot restripe plan showing the current conditions please provide. If not, the following comments in regards to the parking spaces will apply and revisions to the plan and site will be required. One other option would be to return the parking lot configuration to the match the last approved site plan. This review is based on sheet SP-1 only. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.5 Provide all proposed dimensions and bearings for parcel 2 and the changed lot dimensions and bearings for parcel 1. Provide on the plan the square footage of parcel one and parcel two. Provide FAR calculations for the existing building and parcel one. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.11 Clearly indicate the widths of all PAALs. Near the southeast corner of parcel one the 2 indicated parking spaces on the east portion do not appear to have the required 24' width PAAL behind a perpendicular parking space. Clarify. At the northeast corner of the property clearly indicate the width of the PAAL behind the indicated 4 parking spaces. A backup spur is required for the southern most parking space of this group of four. (minimum 3' radius curb with 3' clear area behind the curb) 4. DS 2-02.2.1.12 The sidewalk and cross walk indicated on the site plan connecting to the sidewalk in the right of way has been removed or never installed. This sidewalk with handicap ramps and the cross walk connecting to the pedestrian circulation path for the building are required including a sidewalk along the west side of the building.. The pedestrian circulation path indicated above must be physically separated from the vehicular use area. The indicated parallel parking space in this area would thus require the sidewalk to be raised or curbing installed behind the parking space. The sidewalk along the building's west side would also require to physically separated from the vehicular use area. Clearly indicate the width of the PAAL from the relocated parking spaces along the east property line to the sidewalk along the west side of the building (minimum 24'). The handicap parking spaces have been relocated on this plan as compared to the last approved site plan. Provide an accessible pedestrian path from the handicap parking spaces (cross walk) which only crosses the PAAL. If the handicap parking spaces are relocated to comply with the last approved site plan, clearly indicate spaces and cross walk. The indicated amount of parking spaces (102) requires 5 handicap parking spaces. See IBC Sec.1106.1. Van accessible handicap parking spaces are require for every six provided handicap parking spaces or fraction there of. This site will require a minimum of one (1) van accessible handicap parking space. See IBC Sec. 1106.5. Provide a detail and location of the required handicap parking signage. FYI: Minimum height from grade to the bottom of sign is seven (7) feet. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.14 The loading zone has been relocated to a different area than the last approved site plan. In its present location the loading zone is in conflict for maneuverability with the trash enclosure. Revise. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.28 Clearly indicate the location of the zoning boundary between the RX-2 and the C-2 zoning of the proposed site. The location of the boundary as indicated on the zoning maps available on line is incorrect. The correct location is as indicated on the last approved site plan. The zoning line is the boundary with the property to the south (line has a measurement of 96.88') and continues east along the same line. The aerial photos and submitted plan indicate pavement has been placed in the RX-2 portion of the site. RX-2 zoning does not allow commercial development. The pavement indicated will have to be removed and post barricades or curbing will be required to be installed to prevent vehicles from driving on to unimproved portions of the site. This may also affect the future plans you have submitted as reference. 7. Based on changes made to the site plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T06CM06084.doc |
| 12/11/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 12/13/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. If expansions are less than 25%; the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. Additional-parking spaces along Tanque Verde must meet landscape requirements. 2. Submit previously approved landscape plan, to verify that site expansions meet current minimum requirements. 3. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 4. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Verify expansion area meets canopy tree requirement. 5. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/13/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit previously approved landscape plan, to verify that site expansions meet current minimum requirements. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/24/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |