Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM05849
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/17/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 05/22/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Landscaping requirements apply to expansion of existing development as follows: On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B 2. Provide the calculation and percent of building expansion. Show the square footage of structures to be demolished in the calculation. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded. Provide last approved site and landscape plan. 3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/22/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 05/22/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Walgreens & Wells Fargo - NE Corner of Golf Links & Kolb T06CM05849 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 21, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. General: 1. The effected areas of this site plan were reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). 2. Zoning acknowledges the response, but there were not any approved site plans provided with this submittal. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan or plans for the entire center with the next submittal. 3. This comment is in reference to the entire site, see attached Assessor's Record Map. The parcels outlined for Walgreens and Wells Fargo constitute a lot split. This said, provide a twenty year lot history for the entire site. Depending on the twenty year lot history a final plat may be required. All lot line issues will need to be clarified or corrected prior to approval of the site plan. It appears that the site as shown on sheet A0.0 is one large parcel. Per the Assessor's Record Map this site is made up of 6 parcels, add missing property lines to plan. The area proposed for the Walgreens consists of two (2) different parcels. Prior to approval of the site plan the parcels will need to be combined. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property, see attached. It appears that some type of lot split is planned based on the lot lines show around the proposed structures, clarify. If a lot split is planned provide cross access and cross parking agreements. 4. This comment was not fully addressed. Landscape buffer yards will be required along both Kolb and Golf Links, see Landscape comments. It does not appear that the proposed project, as proposed, will work when the future right-of-way is taken. Either design to the future right-of-way or provide a future site plan showing how the site will work when the right-of-way is taken. Additional comments may be forth coming. 5. Until the last approved site plans for the entire site are provided Zoning cannot verify the percent of building expansion. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Provide a calculation for the percent of building expansion. Show the square footage of structures to be demolished in the calculation. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included. 6. It appears that both Walgreens and Wells Fargo are being developed as stand alone parcels. This said due to access a recorded cross access agreement is required for both the Walgreens and Wells Fargo. Walgreens: 7. The comment was not fully addressed. Provide dimensions for the vehicle overhangs, i.e. for the sidewalk adjacent to the south and west walls of the proposed buildings. It appears that there area columns supporting the a canopy and Zoning cannot verify if these columns encroach into the 2'-6" overhang. Per . Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 Some type of barrier is required to prevent parked vehicles from damaging adjacent landscaping, this said the parking spaces located along Kolb & Golf Links will require some type of barrier. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The parking space details show Pre-cast wheel stops, are wheel stops being provided at all vehicle parking spaces? If wheel stops are not supplied dimension the overhang for all parking spaces. Per D.S.3-05.2.3.C.2.1the parking along the west property line will require some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from overhanging the property line. 8. This comment was not fully addressed. It appears that the curbing stops about mid point of the parking space. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1 the parking space must be physically separated from the sidewalk/access ramp. Also it appears that the cross walk encroaches into the parking space. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The west island shown at the entrance off of Golf Links should be the full depth of the parking space. 9. This comment was not fully addressed. Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 show the 5'-0' access aisle on the detail. It appears that there is not enough space if a vehicle is parked on either side of the bicycle parking. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 & D.S. 2-09.0 Provide off-street bicycle parking; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. The proposed detail 2/C1.3 does not meet the current requirements in D.S. 2-09.0. 10. This comment was not fully addressed. Future SVT's are shown based on future curb, see comment 40. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.10 Provide existing & future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan. 11. This comment was not fully addressed. If abandonment will not take place prior to the start of this project provide a letter from the utility company that allows the building to be built across the easement. Abandonment must be completed or a letter from the utility company provided prior to the approval of the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. It appears that there is an easement, which runs east and west directly through the proposed building. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this site plan. Provide documentation of the abandonment. 12. This comment has not been fully addressed. Show the future curb for both Kolb & Golf Links. Future curb is located 12' from ROW, see Engineering comments. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21. Show and label all existing and future curbs along Kolb Road & Golf Links Road. If the existing is also future, then label it as "Existing & Future". 13. The handicapped parking sign detail 8 shown on sheet A0.2 does not meet the minimum mounting height or 7'-0" from grade to the bottom of the sign 14. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plan. Wells Fargo: 15. Provide the clear height of the drive-thru canopy. Based on the provided elevation the drive-thru canopy clear elevation is 11'-0", per D.S. 3-05.2.1.4 the minimum height clearance for a delivery vehicle is 15'. Due to the placement of the loading space the 15' is the minimum clearance. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide on the plan the building height and identify building overhangs and canopies. 16. It appears that the 9'-0" drive-thru lane width exceeds the two (2) car length allowed per D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2.b, clarify. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Show the required minimum stacking capacity for the drive-through aisles. Per D.S.3-05.2.1.C.2.c four (4) stacking spaces are required. 17. The comment was not fully addressed. Provide dimensions for the vehicle overhangs. Per . Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 some type of barrier is required to prevent parked vehicles from damaging adjacent landscaping, this said the parking spaces located along Golf Links will require some type of barrier. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The parking space details show Pre-cast wheel stops, are wheel stops being provided at all vehicle parking spaces? If wheel stops are not supplied dimension the overhang for all parking spaces. If overhanging of the sidewalks is proposed then the minimum width of the sidewalk is 6'-6". 18. This comment was not fully addressed. Per D.S. 2-09.5.2 show the 5'-0' access aisle on the detail. Also provide the specific type of rack. Additional comments may be forth coming. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.9 & D.S. 2-09.0 Provide off-street bicycle parking; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. 19. This comment was not fully addressed. Future SVT's are shown based on future curb, see comment 40. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.10 Provide existing & future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan. 20. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a dimension for the width of the sidewalk located near the southeast corner of the building between the parking spaces. Also the sidewalk which extends from the curb ramp along side of the existing signage clarify if this is proposed or existing and provide a dimension. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide dimensions for the width of all sidewalks. 21. The comment has not been fully addressed. The revised crosswalk encroaches into the minimum 24' width of the two-way PAAL. If this crosswalk is to run parallel with the PAAL as shown then it is required to be a sidewalk, physically separated from the any vehicular travel lane per D.S. 2-08.4.1 D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed crosswalk running across the south PAAL from the sidewalk to the sidewalk along Golf Links Road needs to run perpendicular to the PAAL. The proposed angle creates a safety hazard to pedestrians when vehicles are backing out of parking spaces. 22. Based on current aerial photos the existing sign shown at the west side of the entrance PAAL off of Golf Links D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 23. Zoning acknowledges the location of the loading space. Show the maneuvering area on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Provide, dimension and show maneuvering area for the required loading zone, LUC Sec. 3.4.5.3 24. This comment has not been fully addressed. On sheet A0.0 & A0.1 the existing right-of-way is called out as 75'-0". On sheet A0.01 the right-of-way is called out as 75'-5", clarify. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide the existing and future right-of-way dimensions for Golf Links Road. There is a dimension of "101'-6" FUTURE R.O.W." shown on the plan, which is incorrect, the future ½ right-of-way is 100'. Provide the existing right-of-way for Golf Links Road. 25. This comment has not been fully addressed. Show the future curb for Grant. Future curb is location 12' from ROW, based on the 150 ROW . D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21. Show and label all existing and future curbs along Golf Links Road. 26. The existing use should be listed as General Merchandise Sales, as it is part of the overall shopping center. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide existing use on the plan. 27. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The revisions made to the plan i.e. addition of a loading zone, reduced the width of the PAAL located to the north of the proposed building. Per 3-05.2.1.C.1 the minimum width is twenty-four (24) feet, revise plan. 28. The handicapped parking sign detail B5 & D1 shown on sheet A0.02 does not meet the minimum mounting height or 7'-0" from grade to the bottom of the sign. 29. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm05849-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 07/12/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Oracle Engineering Copany DATE: July 16, 2007 Peter Solanga 199 E. Fort Lowell Tucson, Arizona 85705 SUBJECT: Walgreens No. 10879, 7111 E. Golf Links Road Site plan T06CM05849 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 20 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Per my phone conversation with Peter Solanga on 07-13-07, it was determined that the comments were addressed on the grading plan included in the site plan submittal. The comments must be addressed on the site plan. The grading plan will used as reference only in this submittal. A separate grading application and permit will be required. See previous comment no. 19. Address the following comments on the site plan. 3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 10. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 13. Show Site plan number (T06CM05849) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 14. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The refuse enclosure and the loading zone cannot "share" the same space. Revise as required. 15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 16. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 17. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 19. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted for Site plan purposes only. The final acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. 2. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7111 E. Golf Links Road site 2 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/16/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |