Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T06CM05796
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2006 | BETSY COTTLE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 11/24/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/24/2006 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/24/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/19/2006 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/19/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T06CM05796 4110 S. Houghton Rd. Cell Tower Site TRANSMITTAL: 11/20/06 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The site survey plan (LS-1) and the site plan (C-1) do not match in regards to the location of the property lines. Upon research of the Pima County Assessors records it appears the property lines as indicated on C-1 and Pima County records are the same. As per the Pima Count Assessor's records the east west width of the property is 169.04' not 240.45' as indicated on sheet LS-1. Provide dimensions from centerline of Houghton Rd. and dimensions for all property lines on sheet C-1. Buildings are not allowed to be constructed over property lines. Sheet LS-1 for the preliminary submittal for the Special Exception process (SE-06-27) shows property lines which are in conflict with Sheet LS-1 for the site and building plans. Clarify. If a lot split/reconfiguration has been done on this property provide the City of Tucson stamped and approved plans for the lot reconfiguration. If the lot reconfiguration has not been approved by the City of Tucson a lot split/reconfiguration must be processed through Development Services. Clearly indicate on the lot split and all other plans the location of the zoning boundaries. The indicated ingress/ egress easements indicated on sheet LS-1 does not appear to connect with any street which ingress/egress is required from. Clarify. If a lot split/reconfiguration is going to be submitted it may be advisable to include the new cell tower site into the site with existing cell tower site. This would eliminate the need for a cross access agreement being required from one property to another. 2. This site being along Houghton Rd. is within the overlay zone for the Scenic Corridor . Clearly indicate on the plans the required 400' overlay boundary. A separate submittal is required for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. Contact Patricia Gehlen for information regarding the special application process for a Scenic Overlay Zone. 3. The Cell Tower site plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Special Exception section of DSD and all zoning comments have been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T06CM05796.doc |
| 12/19/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/19/2006 | LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | December 12, 2006 CITY OF TUCSON - FINAL CHECK Tucson Appl. No. T06CM05796 Bureau Veritas Project No. 01006-161107 Mr. Steve Long Acting Chief Building Official Building Safety Department 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 (520) 791-5550 Re: Plan Review: Tâ Mobile T.I. Address: 4110 S. Houghton Rd Dear Mr. Long: Bureau Veritas North America has completed a review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson: 1. Plans: Two (2) sets of plans (9 sheets, 1 through 9) dated August 30, 2006 by Robert A. Young. Structural Calculations: One (1) set of calculations dated July 5, 2006 by Robert A. Young. Geotechnical Report: Two (2) sets of geotechnical report dated June 3, 2006 by Oleg G. Lysy. Miscellaneous: One (1) set of 8â CMU Wall Design dated August 30, 2006 by Terra Dynamic Engineering, LLC. Two (2) sets of Special Inspection Certificate dated August 31, 2006 by Jason C. Wells for Masonry, Concrete and High Strength Bolts. These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2003 IRC, 2003 IMC, 2002 NEC and 2003 IPC). The above referenced project has been reviewed and accepted. Sincerely, BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA Shelley Knuffke I.C.C. Plans Examiner SK:pc F:\Tucson\01006-161107pcf.doc enclosures |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2007 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/11/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |