Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM05774
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/23/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/23/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: El Sol Apartments - 2115 N. Oracle Rd. T06OT05774 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 23, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) 2. Remove all references to Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from the plan. This comment was not fully addressed. Per LUC 3.2.3.1.D Development Designator "R" There is no Minimum Lot Size or Floor Area Ratio (FAR) requirement, remove all references from the plan. Sheet S-00, Zoning Information under (F) Residential Use Group. Sec 6.3.8 you list Group dwelling, this is incorrect. Revise this to read Family Dwelling "R". Revise the remainder of the information to meet the requirements of LUC 3.2.3.1.D "R". There is no Min. Site Area, FAR for the Development Designator. Revise the drawings to reflect the correct calculations for the Development Designator "R". This includes a lot coverage calculation & density calculation. 3. Zoning acknowledges the bicycle parking detail on sheet S-00 that meets the requirements for Class 2 bicycle parking per D.S. 2-09. Detail 4 Sheet S-05 is still not correct, please clarify which detail is to be used. This comment was not fully addressed. The proposed bike rack does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.2.3 for a two (2) point support system see attached Development Standards. The proposed bicycle parking detail, plan view and elevation does not meet the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-09 Supplement 9. The required number of bicycle parking based on the number of parking spaces provided is two (2). The class 2 bicycle parking space located behind the trash enclosure is not required and does not meet the location requirements D.S. 2-09.0. Either remove this bicycle parking or provide signage and an access route to the bicycle parking, which is not part of the pedestrian way. D.S. 2-09.3.2. 2-02.2.1.A.9 4. Sheet S-00 has a lot coverage calculation that has a total lot coverage percentage "PROVIDED 49%. Sheet S-01 has a lot coverage calculation that has a total lot coverage percentage "PROVIDED 41%. Please clarify which calculation is correct and remove the incorrect calculation from the plan. 5. Zoning is willing to provide an over the counter review once the above comments have been addressed. Please call or email for an appointment. 6. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t06ot05774-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/30/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/31/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 14, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM05774 PROJECT NAME: El Sol Apartments PROJECT ADDRESS: 2115 North Oracle Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. The existing ½ ROW is 65' and must be shown on the plan. Dimension from the centerline of Oracle Road the existing ½ ROW. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. Third request. 2. After reviewing the paving plans on the Transportation Department Map Site the plans indicate the existing half ROW width for Oracle Road is 65'. The submitted site plan shows an existing and future 75' half ROW width for Oracle Road. Show the 75' future half ROW width and the 65'existing ROW width on the plan; this requires two dimensions shown on the plan. See above comment 1. Label appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19., 21. 3. After reviewing the paving plans on the Transportation Department Map Site the plans indicate the existing sidewalk located within the ROW is 5'. Please verify if the sidewalk within the ROW is 5' or 6' and revise the plan appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. The above comment is from the previous review, as stated before the City of Tucson Department of Transportation paving plans indicate the sidewalk within the ROW is 5'. The plans have not changed since the last submittal. Revise the plans to reflect current conditions. 4. Revise the sight visibility triangles (SVTs) to reflect the requested ROW changes. Provide existing and future SVTs on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. |
| 09/18/2007 | CAGUILA1 | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |