Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM05677
Parcel: 130140230

Address:
4220 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T06CM05677
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/02/2006 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Provide new fire hydrant locations or indicate all building to have automatic fir esprinklers.
2. Correct turning radius for correct width and 53'6" outside radius.
3. Gates will require 20 feet clear and fire department access boxes.
11/09/2006 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Tucson Dodge
T06CM05677
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 16, 2006

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC).

2. Add a note to the plan stating "The project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec 2.8.3 Major Streets & Route (MS&R). 22nd St. and Columbus Blvd are both MS&R.

3. It appears that this project is comprised of two (2) different parcels. Prior to approval of the site plan the parcels will need to be combined. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property.

4. The information shown under the LUC PROJECT DATA is incorrect. Dev. Designator is 31, Subject to 3.5.9.5.A & B; The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 0.90; Building height is 40'-0". Revise the LUC Project Data.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the building heights for all the buildings. If any of the proposed structures are open (carports, covered detailing etc.) annotate on the plan. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Until the building heights for all buildings are provided, Zoning is unable to verify that the provided setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the LUC. The setbacks shown under the LUC PROJECT DATA, Perimeter Yard are incorrect. LUC 3.2.6.5.B. Setback requirement for both 22nd St. and Columbus Blvd. is 21' or the height of the exterior building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of existing or future curb. The setback to the south and west property line is 0'. Provide the dimensions for the building setbacks.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 It appears that there is some type of drive-through canopy located on the east end of the "NEW SALES AND SERVICE FACILITY". Please clarify and provide the height. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 It appears that there is some type of canopy or overhang located on the north end of the "NEW SALES AND SERVICE FACILITY". Please clarify and provide the height. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 & D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.1 Provide dimensions from the proposed loading zones to the parking located to the west. It appears that this dimension is less then the required 24'

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide typical vehicle parking space details for the standard space.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 The parking space used to access the five (5) proposed vehicle display areas, four (4) along 22nd and one (1) alone Columbus, cannot be counted as provide vehicle parking spaces.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Show how vehicles will enter the DTL building. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a dimension for the PAAL between the "DTL" building and the vehicle parking spaces to the west.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 There is a 5'-0" high screen wall called out at the northeast corner of the "OFFICES" building, per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D a fully dimensioned backup spur is required on both the north & south side of this wall. Also provide the minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the wall and the backup spur.

16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Dimension the backup spur shown on the south end of the NEW CAR DISPLAY located on the east side of NEW SALES AND SERVICE FACILITY. D.S. 3-05.2.2.D

17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 It appears there is a wall and gate located at the southeast corner of the OFFICES. The wall appears to encroach into the PAAL. The wall must be removed from the PAAL. If the gate is to remain open during business hours, state so on the plan. If the gate is to be closed during business hours then a dimensioned backup spur is required per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D for both sides of this gate.

18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Clearly delineate between required vehicle parking (employee & customer) and vehicle display area.

19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 It appears that there is a vehicle entrance into the OFFICES building along the southeast wall, clarify.

20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Show the location of the off-street bicycle parking. Provide materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimension layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. There is Keynote 15, which calls out Class II bike spaces per detail 4/C1.1. Keynote 15 is not shown on the plan & detail 4 is not on sheet C1.1. Additional comments may be forth coming.

21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Show the location of the main entrances for all buildings so that correct location of the Class 2 bicycle parking can be verified. D.S. 2-09.4.1

22. Provide existing and future Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT's) on the plan. The SVT's as shown on the plan are not correct, see Engineering comments.

23. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide dimensions for the width of all proposed sidewalks, this includes the area around buildings if sidewalks are proposed, so that the pedestrian circulation/accessible routes can be verified.

24. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 & D.S. 2-08.3.1 A pedestrian circulation paths/accessible route is required between all buildings. There is no pedestrian circulation paths/accessible route shown between the NEW SALES AND SERVICE FACILITY and the OFFICE PAINT/ BODY SHOP and the DTL/BTLR AUTO/WASH CAR buildings.

25. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 A sidewalk will be provided per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B along the south side of the PAINT/ BODY SHOP; west side of the DTL/BTLR AUTO/WASH CAR.

26. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Label and dimension all the crosswalks shown on the plan.

27. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Keynote 14 should reference detail T-102/T1

28. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 It is unclear how the handicapped vehicle parking spaces access the sidewalk area along the north side of the NEW SALES AND SERVICE FACILITY. On the grading plan curb ramps are shown, clarify. Additional comments may be forth coming.

29. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The handicapped sign/post detail, T101/T.1, is incorrect. The dimension from grade to the bottom of sign is 7'-0", revise detail

30. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards.

31. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label 22nd Street and Columbus Blvd. as MS&R routes.

32. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide a dimension for 22nd Street right-of-way, both existing and future. If the existing is the future label it as EXISTING/FUTURE.

33. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Per the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes Plan Columbus Blvd. will have a right-of-way taper, see engineering comments, this plan does not reflect this taper. Either design to the future taper and show it on the plan or provide a future right-of-way plan showing how this development will meet the requirements when the taper is in place.

34. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

35. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 Label the existing & future curb locations for both 22nd Street and Columbus Blvd. if they are the same then label the curb as existing & future.

36. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable provide existing and proposed freestanding lighting layout and type. Provide a detail; list the height of pole and type of lighting.

37. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the plan.

38. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Provide the square footage for each building. There is no square footage listed for the DTL/BTLR AUTO/WASH CAR building. This square footage needs to be added to the total building area listed on sheet T.1

39. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 The floor area ratio (FAR) shown on the plan is incorrect, see comment 4. Revise the FAR to show "ALLOWED = 0.90, PROPOSED = ??. Include the DTL/BTLR AUTO/WASH CAR square footage.

40. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Per a determination from the Zoning Administrator parking requirements for "Vehicle Rental and Sales" will be based on the areas as follows. The square footage of areas within a structure where vehicles have direct access, such as service bays, paint shop, detail car wash area, will not count toward the total gross floor area for parking calculation. Areas that do count for parking will be the office areas, sales area, parts/storage areas. Clearly delineate the areas within the structures that vehicles have access too. Provide the number of required and provided vehicle parking spaces in the Parking Calc. Clearly delineate between required vehicle parking and vehicle display area, see comment 18. Additional comments may be forth coming. If you need additional information in regards to this comment please contact David Rivera @791-5608 ext. 1181

41. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Per the IBC 8 handicapped spaces are required, 2 van accessible, show this on you calc.

42. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking space calculation is based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided LUC 3.3.3.5, based on 366 provided 15 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces required is correct. Until comments 18 & 40 are addressed zoning cannot verify this requirement. Additional comments may be forth coming.

43. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Until the total building square footage is revised the required number of loading zones cannot be verified. See comments 39 & 40.

44. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\site\t06cm05677.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
11/16/2006 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Comments
11/17/2006 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Landscaping requirements apply to expansion of existing development as follows:
On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows:
If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B.

2. A 30" continuous screen along 22nd Street for the vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I

3. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of interior and street landscape borders per LUC 3.7.2.4. Additional trees are required.

4. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Verify entire site meets canopy tree requirement. Label all vehicle use areas on the landscape plan.

5. Include inside dimensions of strip planter within vehicle use area on the landscape, site and grading plans. A minimum of 4' in width must be provided for each canopy tree. The measurement is always within the planter area and does not include any material which defines the outer edge of the unpaved area per DS 2-06.3.3.C.

6. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following Information:

§ Locations, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place.

§ All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Revise note pertaining to decomposed granite accordingly.

7. The spacing of trees in the landscape borders must be adjusted to prevent conflict with utility wires and easements per DS 2-06.3.4.D. Verify that tree plantings to the south do not interfere with overhead utility lines.

8. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. The site plan indicates unpaved islands to the south, show planters on the landscape plan.

9. Additional comments may apply.
11/17/2006 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved Exception
12/11/2006 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 14, 2006
SUBJECT: 4220 E 22nd Street- Engineering review of site plan and grading plan
TO: ADG Attn: Hilary Meehan
LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec22, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T06CM05677 (site plan) and T06BU02595 (grading plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T06CM05677), grading plan (T06BU02595), and drainage report (prepared by DCC, dated 10-27-06), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise Sheet T.1 to replace all red lettering from the title sheet with black lettering to insure site plan clarity for reproduction and microfiche purposes.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the project location map on Sheet T.1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as watercourses and subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label the dimensions for the proposed back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL located at the new car delivery area that is shown on the proposed site plan. The spur must have a minimum of a 3-foot radii and 3 feet in depth, but must also provide a minimum of 3 feet between the back of spur and any wall obstruction that is over 6 inches in height.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide a back-up spur at the end of each PAAL located at the proposed screen wall located on the northeast corner of the office building. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for requirements.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide wheel stop barriers for all parking stalls located adjacent to the pedestrian circulation areas. Wheel stop barriers are required at these locations to prevent parked vehicles from extending into the unobstructed 4-foot pedestrian circulation area.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide dimensions for all 2-way PAALs shown on the site plan. Verify that PAALs have a minimum 24-foot wide access area where gates are proposed and for parking stalls located across from proposed buildings.

7) DS Sec.2-02.A.8: Revise the site plan to show the minimum unobstructed radius of 18' that is required at all PAAL intersection that are being used as access for refuse collection and fire lanes. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b for PAAL requirements. Specifically for the PAAL adjacent to the Truck Display.

8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the existing and future sight visibility triangles for all intersections of the PAALs at Columbus Boulevard and 22nd Street. Label if existing right-of-way is greater than or equal to the future right-of-way. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 for sight visibility requirements and dimensions.

9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Provide both SVT triangles, labeled and dimensioned, for the intersection of Columbus Boulevard and 22nd Street. SVT's are only applicable for the subject property.

10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise Key Note #3 to call out the 25-feet radii and concrete curbs per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5 at all of the driveway entrances located on 22nd Street and Columbus Boulevard. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards.

11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise Key Note #5 on the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Columbus Boulevard. Revise dimensions on site plan to show the 6-foot width. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks.

12) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise key Note #14 on the site plan to reference detail T-102 or call out truncated domes in the key note.

13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required striped pedestrian circulation path (crosswalk) that is required from the New Sales Building to the pedestrian circulation path located along Columbus Boulevard.

14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the pedestrian circulation located on the east side of the proposed office building that connects the building to the adjacent pedestrian circulation along Columbus. Crosswalks can not cross behind parking stalls or be located as to impede the safety of pedestrians.

15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required pedestrian circulation paths between all proposed buildings. The pedestrian circulation paths must be provided around the entire proposed structure or clarify adequate pedestrian refuge areas to all public use areas. Pedestrian circulation must be 5-feet in width were adjacent to a PAAL and a structure.

16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Label and show on the site plan the maneuvering area for all loading zones required on the site plan. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii.

17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide roof drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show down spout locations at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.

18) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide the finish floor elevation (FFE) on the site plan for all proposed buildings. The finish floor elevations must be greater than or equal to the FFE elevations in the proposed drainage report and the elevation called out on the proposed grading plan must match the site plan.

19) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to show the entire floodplain width for Naylor Wash located along the south side of the subject property.

20) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.18: Revise the site plan to call out 22nd Street and Columbus Boulevard as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R). Provide a note stating that the site plan is in conformance with the MS&R overlay zone criteria.

21) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label the existing and future right-of-way widths for all MS&R streets. If the existing right-of-way is built out to the required future right-of-way label the site plan to clarify.

22) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Provide the recordation information for 22nd Street and Columbus Boulevard along with the right-of-way widths shown.
23) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and show the intersection widening for both sides of Columbus Boulevard and 22nd Street intersection. Refer to the MS&R Plan for intersection widening requirements (http://www.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/regional/msr).

24) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Provide on the site plan all easements for the existing and proposed utilities (water, gas, electric) and public/private sewer lines. The easements must be shown graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

25) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Provide on the site plan the dimensions from the street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines.

26) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to relocate the trash container enclosure outside of the existing electrical easements.

27) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise Detail A5 on Sheet C1.2 to provide for the required bollards along the sides of the enclosure. The enclosure must meet the minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the bollards that are required between the containers and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction.

28) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to match the revised site plan. Verify that the SVTs on the landscape plan match the site plan.


GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval.

29) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Provide a geotechnical report evaluation to discuss the feasibility of the project. Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to existing constructed channel. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development.

30) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Provide typical lot grading details, show minimum side and rear setbacks. Provide detailed cross sections for each perimeter, fully labeled and dimensioned.

31) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Provide spot elevations at all curb openings that are being used for site runoff to assure drainage of onsite flows into landscape areas or the Naylor Wash.

32) DS Sec.11-01.8.1.A: Clarify on Sheet 3 of 4 of the grading plan the spot elevation located on the south side of the proposed Paint and Body Shop. Elevation shown is finished surface adjacent to the pedestrian circulation, which is 0.04-foot higher than the finished floor elevation of the proposed building. Verify that differential grading has been addressed for the southern portion of the subject property per the requirements within this section.

33) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide details for all back-up spurs located at the end of PAALs. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for requirements.

34) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide wheel stop barrier locations and a detail for all parking stalls located adjacent to the pedestrian circulation areas. Wheel stop barriers are required at these locations to prevent parked vehicles from extending into the unobstructed 4-foot pedestrian circulation area.

35) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide locations of existing storm drains located along 22nd Street. Verify in the drainage report that the 41cfs of onsite flow out of the PAAL is contained within the roadway section of 22nd Street. Provide spot elevations along 22nd Street to assure drainage into the storm drains.

36) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension all scuppers that are used for collecting roof drainage and discharges at the pedestrian sidewalk. The scuppers proposed under the sidewalk must be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.

37) Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan.


DRAINAGE REPORT:

38) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3.B.3: Provide a table within the text of the report that summarizes the watershed characteristics and flood peaks for both pre-developed and post-developed conditions.

39) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide location of storm drains located on 22nd ST. Clarify that WS9 (41.8 cfs) can be contained within the right-of-way of 22nd St and that the existing storm drains are properly sized. Provide spot elevations on grading plan to show drainage patterns off-site.

40) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revised grading plan must show roof drainage and location of all concentration points. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas provide calculations and detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk.


GEOTECHNICAL REPORT:

41) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report Evaluation that addresses the following:

a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to existing constructed channel.

b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development.

c) The soils report shall provide recommendations for asphalt design and thickness.


STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN:

42) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required at resubmittal of the grading plan. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan, revised drainage report, geotechnical report and a SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference.

If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/14/2006 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/14/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed