Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM05594
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/06/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Code review information on first sheet incorrect. City of Tucson has adopted the 2003 IBC & IFC. References to UBC, type 2-N construction, occupancy: 8-1, etc. should be revised. |
| 04/17/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: American Home Furnishings - Warehouse Expansion T06CM05594 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 18, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) due to an expansion of greater then 25% of building/structure area. 2. This site plan was reviewed as "STOREAGE USE GROUP, COMMERCIAL STORAGE, Subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.10.1" and the following comments reflect this review. Zoning is in the process verifying if this project requires review under LUC Sec. 3.5.9.7 "LARGE RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT" design criteria. Information regarding this project has been forwarded to the City of Tucson's Zoning Administrator and Attorney's office so that a determination can be made in regards to the large retail establishment. Additional review and comments may be forth coming. 3. Provide the recorded documentation for the following requirements. It appears that this project is comprised of four (4) different parcels. Prior to approval of the site plan the parcels will need to be combined. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. 4. Zoning acknowledges that the required setbacks along Prince Road will be provided on the plan once the location of the future curb is determined. Zoning was not able to find the setback dimension to Weymouth Street. Based on the provided building height of 50'-2" it does not appear that the proposed structure will meet setbacks. LUC 3.2.6.5.B.1 & D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide the required building setbacks from Prince Road and Weymouth Street. This set back is based on the location of the existing or future curb along Prince Road and Weymouth Street. Future curb needs to be shown along Prince Road and then the required setback dimensioned from the back of future curb. Label the future and existing curb along both Prince Road and Weymouth Street. If the future and existing curb are one in the same label the curb as existing & future. The setback for both Prince Road and Weymouth Street is 21' or the height of the building which ever is greatest. The required setback can not be determined until the height of the proposed addition is provided on the plan, see comment 3. Be aware that a future taper is planned for this area, see engineering comments. The east setback and setback line shown is incorrect. Per LUC 3.2.6.4 I1 to I1 zone requires a 0 setback. 5. Zoning acknowledges the provided details for both handicapped and standard parking spaces. On the detail provide a dimension for the location of the wheel stop. Per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13 show the required detectable warnings (truncated domes) on the handicapped detail and on the plan for all other curb access ramps. Per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5 show the maximum surface slopes for the handicapped parking space and access aisles. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Fully dimension the parking layout. Provide typical details for both handicapped and standard parking spaces. 6. Per Keynote 18A "PROPOSED CLASS 2 BICYCLE PARKING POST TO REMAIN UNCHANGED (SEE DETAIL F, SHEET 2), it is unclear how PROPOSED can remain unchanged, please clarify. As this project is full code compliance the existing and proposed bicycle parking is required to meet current code. See revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised Development Standards may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide off-street bicycle parking, including material for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles is supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. 7. If the DSMR is approved, provide the DSMR number, date of approval, and any conditions, which may be required by the DSMR on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 & D.S. 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where a building is located. There is no sidewalk shown on the south side of the proposed addition and at appears that there is not enough room to provide a sidewalk around the southeast corner of the building. 8. Per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13 show the required detectable warnings (truncated domes) at all curb access ramps (existing & proposed) D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 & D.S. 2-08.1 An accessible route is required from the main entrance of the building to the sidewalk in the right-of-way along Prince Road. There is a sidewalk shown with a crosswalk across the PAAL and then a sidewalk out to Prince Road. There are no curb access ramps or areas that indicate that the sidewalk is flush with the pavement, therefore it is unclear where the accessible route is located, clarify. 9. Sheet 5 of 7 there is a 10' x 15' electrical transformer called out at the southeast corner of the proposed PAAL which runs around the southeast corner of the proposed expansion. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 a minimum setback of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any obstruction. This said it does not appear that the transformer meets this setback. Provide a setback dimension on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t06cm05494-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 04/18/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 05/01/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/02/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review |