Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T06CM05405
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2006 | BETSY COTTLE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 11/07/2006 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Provide specifications and cut sheets for the electrical load referred to as "NEON." 2. On the panel schedule for Panel X, fill in the electrical loads on Ckts 13 and 14. 3. Demonstrate compliance with the Tucson Lighting Code. Per telephone conversation with Steve Shell, 12/21/06, uplighting as rendered on Sheet A-10 shall be eliminated in all sheets which may apply. 4. The need for Series Rated Notes is questionable given that the AFC at the new panel is well under 10K. 5. Sheet A-5 calls for some new exit lighting. Please coordinate this on the Electrical plans. 6. Sheet A-6 calls for an alternate to replace some existing automatic doors. Please coordinate this on the Electrical plans as necessary. |
| 11/27/2006 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 12/13/06 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM05405 PROJECT NAME: Sam Levitz New Front canopy PROJECT ADDRESS: 100 N Pantano Rd. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: Steve Shell PROJECT REVIEWER: Christy Foreman TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CHRISTY.FOREMA1@TUCSONAZ.GOV IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) Provide structural calculations for the following items: Lateral & seismic analysis, M1 - Masonry Column, F3 - footings, C3 column, B4 beam, B5 beam 2) On beam and joist schedule clarify allowable span length per justification in structural calculations. It appears J2 exceeds span justified. Key plan in structural calculations should relate to call outs on beam and joist schedule. 3) Detail 407/S4.4 specifies detail 407A, please clarify location in drawings. 4) Clarify which are shop welds & field welds on details S4.4, and S4.5. 5) Detail 4/A10 clarify connection for metal cap creating light valence. 6) Clarify and detail connection for metal cap and trim. 7) Special inspections shall be required for Masonry, shop welding, field welding, and epoxy bolts. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/08/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |