Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM05403
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/12/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Hegel Court - Minor Subdivision T06CM05403 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan. 3. Provide lot bearings and dimensions for all property lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 4. Fully dimension the backup spurs shown on the plan. D.S. 3-05.2.2.D, D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 5. The east backup spur requires a minimum distance of three (3) feet to be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height, D.S. 3-05.2.2.D. Per the plan there is an existing shed located directly adjacent to the backup spur. Revise the plan as necessary. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 6. A sidewalk is required between the Existing Stucco Home and the PAAL. 2-08.4.1.B, D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 7. All curb access ramps are required to have detectable warnings (truncated domes) per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 406.13, revise Keynote 30 to indicate this requirement or provide a detail. D.S. 2-02.1.A.1 8. If sidewalks are not required along Hegel Lane by COT DSD Engineering then the sidewalks, which run parallel to the north south PAAL, should run to the property line. The curb access ramp shown on the west side of PAAL at the north end should is not required and poses a danger to pedestrians as shown on the plan at this time. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 9. Provide striped crosswalks between the curb access ramps shown near the south PAAL. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 10. Realign the curb access ramp shown on the east side of the north south PAAL near the existing stucco house so that the crosswalk runs perpendicular to the PAAL. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 11. It appears that the buildings on lots 1, 2 & 3 are duplex units. The parking calculations call out single family dwellings for all units. Parking for the duplexes is based on the number of bedrooms not per dwelling unit. LUC 3.3.4 Provide floor plans showing the number of bedrooms for each duplex and revise the parking calculation. D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 12. General note 3 calls out Family Dwelling, "M", subject to LUC Sec. 3.2.3.1.C. Per LUC Sec 2.3.7.2.A.5 there is no subject to. Remove the subject to. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm05403.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/17/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 10/23/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All landscaping and screening must comply with the sight visibility requirements of Development Standard 3-01.0. Plant materials located within sight visibility triangles should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty (30) inches. However, trees may be installed within those areas provided that: § The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; § The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street or driveway, whichever is the determining factor in the sight visibility triangle; and § Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed at an angle. Revise the landscape plan as necessary to remove vegetation that will not meet requirements within the SVT. Dasyliron wheeleri and Agave vilmominiana will typically grow in excess of 3 feet. 2. A 5' wall for the vehicle use area adjacent to residential zones must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3. Submit with the Application for Exception; acceptable documentation (photographs), which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. |
| 10/23/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit with the Application for Exception; acceptable documentation (photographs), which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. |
| 11/20/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 24, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM05403 PROJECT NAME: Hegel Court PROJECT ADDRESS: 1545 West Hegel Lane PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN APPROVED: DRAINAGE REPORT SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 1. Please submit a grading permit application card (the green card) with the second submittal. A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is required with the grading permit when there is an acre or more of disturbance. Submit a SWPPP with the grading permit application with the second submittal. DS 11-01. 2. Provide lot bearings and dimensions for all property lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 3. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. 4. Dimension the back up spurs shown on the plan. DS 3-05.2.2.D. 5. The back up spur located on the east side shows a shed adjacent to the vertical curb. A minimum distance of 3' is required between the back up spur and any vertical obstruction over 6" in height. Revise the site plan to show a distance of 3' between the shed and the back up spur. DS 3-05.2.2.D. 6. If applicable graphically show all easements of record on the plan, provide the docket and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 7. The sidewalk adjacent to the " existing structure" must extend the full length of the structure that is adjacent to the PAAL. The current proposal does not depict this. Revise the plan to meet Development Standard 2-08.4.1.B. Refer to Zoning comment number 6. 8. Grading, hydrology, landscape islands and borders are to be integrated in effort to make maximum use of stormwater runoff for supplemental irrigation purposes. Landscape islands and borders must provide water harvesting from the vehicle use area and the rooftops. Small curb opening must be provided to accept the surface stormwater. Revise the site plan to meet this criteria. LUC 3.7.4.3.B. 9. Show roof drainage (flow arrows). DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 10. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." Depending on the direction of the roof drainage, the location of scuppers may need to be shown on the plan. DS 2-08.4.1.E. 11. Show on the site plan the existing and proposed the quantities for the 100 year discharge concentration points. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A. 12. Show a cross-section of the retention basin. Show the appropriate elevations, bottom, top, etc. Give the water surface elevation. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4. 13. A geotechnical report (soils report) is required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility that utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. Percolation test must show a maximum disposal time of 12 hours. Submit a soils report. SDRM 3.5.1. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2006 | FSANCHE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |