Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM05080
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/20/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: T06CM05080, 8178 E. 22nd Street, New Auto Repair facility Commercial Site Plan, 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 20, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings with redlines and a response letter, stating how Zoning Review Section comments for LUC & DS were addressed. 1. (Per last review) Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, for records/ inspections, list required/provided setbacks for this project. Staff verifies no setback issues present. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, with regards to parking: A) increase TYPE size for $518.00 fine for illegal disabled parking for microfilming B) Per IBC 1106.6, relocate disabled parking closer to public office entrance C) clarify if access or curb is provided in south parking lot to prevent use of undeveloped adjacent lot or area that may not be subject to access easement 3. Per DS 2-02.1.1.12, per DS 2-08, due to re-design of the plan: A) 5' wide pedestrian refuge area - striped - is permitted only in areas not generally accessed by public. Provide concrete sidewalk from office entry along front of building (west side) up to area where transitions to garages (see redlines) B) Provide a ramp where transitioning from sidewalk to asphalt refuge area. C) Provide truncated domes on ramps to signify change from pedestrian to vehicular area D) Connect disabled pkg access aisle across parking lot to accessible route (see redlines) 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14, I acknowledge one loading zone required per 3.4.5.3 due to reduction in GFA. See engineering comments regarding maneuvering requirements. 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, with regards to easements A) List docket and page for access easement on adjacent parcel to west (response indicated a copy of it was provided in resubmittal, sorry -not found. B) Delineate area of access easement on adjacent parcel to west (response not clear to width/length of easement-I see lines, however, there are other lines similar - please further clarify with distinct line and dimension). 6. Please note, depending upon responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. For any questions, contact me Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or 837-4951. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T06CM05080 8178 e 22nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 07/21/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | please see zoning review comments |
| 07/26/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border LUC 3.7.3.2 .C.3. Portions of the required screen wall extend more than 3' into street landscape buffer revise site and landscape plan as necessary. 2. Note: The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plan. |
| 07/27/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 08/13/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants b. the location of any gas piping or gas meters c. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer d. The proposed point of connection to the sanitary sewer e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts Reference City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0 2.3 and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Provide the first floor elevation of the proposed building. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 09/01/2007 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Bright/Kliman DATE: September 1, 2007 Architects 1661 N. Swan Road, Ste. 128 Tucson, Arizona 85712 SUBJECT: 22nd Street Automall, 8178 E. 22nd St. Site plan T06CM05080 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 21 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Drainage Statement has been approved. Site Plan: 1. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Show both sides of the SVT's. Site visibility triangle (SVT) indicated in detail B2 - Sheet C5.1 Indicate SVT's on site plan to show both existing and future SVT. 2nd request. 2. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide (label and dimension) the required onsite maneuvering area for the loading zone that is shown adjacent to the proposed building. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. 2nd request. 3. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. Drainage patterns and finished grades appear to be located on the grading plan. Indicate drainage patterns and finished grades on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16 or add note to site plan to refer to grading plan. 2nd request. 4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Estimated cut & fill quantities located on the grading plan. Indicate cut & fill quantities on the site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17 2nd request. 5. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Plan ROW appears to be 150' - Plan ROW is indicating ½ @ 75'. Indicate whether R.O.W. dimensions are existing or future. If the distance is for both existing and future please indicate on site plan. 6. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number on site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23 or add note to refer to grading plan. 2nd request. 7. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Existing PAAL access to proposed trash dumpster does not meet minimum 20' fire access standard which also applies to waste vehicles per 6-01.4.1.G and 6-01.4.1.H. See D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.1 for traffic aisles. Also clarify if access easement will allow adequate spacing for solid waste vehicle. 8. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Indicate slopes in all directions - add note to site plan to refer to grading plan for slopes. 9. If the curb cut just west of the subject property is not being used for access it must be indicated on the plans as being closed. If remaining open clearly indicate on site plan. 10. Corrections are portrayed with a bubble and leader with #1 enclosed by a triangle. Please remove triangles and bubbles and just show correction. Corrections to be submitted in this manner only when modifications are being made to the approved set of plans. |