Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM04805
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide fire hydrant locations. Provide fire flow and building type of construction IFC Appendix B. |
| 09/07/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 09/07/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 2. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for the entire vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3. Clearly indicated in bold delineation plant symbols and site information on the landscape plan to assure that documents are legible when reproduced or when photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record keeping purposes. 4. Lines of sight will not be obscured between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet through a sight visibility triangular area adjacent to a driveway, a PAAL, an alley, or a street. Insure that trees planted within SVT meet requirement or relocate as necessary. 5. Include the following Information on the landscape plan: Material and areas of inert ground cover. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Indicate treatment for landscaped areas. 6. Additional comments may apply. |
| 09/18/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Rick Bright DATE: September 19, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Division SUBJECT: 3150 & 3162 N. Freeway Industrial Loop Site Plans T06CM04785 & T06CM04805 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan with your next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please provide a copy of the approved Tentative Plat. 2. Please provide a Drainage Statement to show that onsite drainage is consistent with the master drainage plan from the approved Tentative Plat. Additionally, the Drainage Statement should discuss the placement of obstructions (i.e., curbs and solid waste enclosures) within the Drainage Easement. 3. Please revise the sight visibility triangles (SVT) with dimensioned measurements for the egress/ingress. 4. Please provide SVT for all drives. 5. Please provide a detail of the "EXIT ONLY" sign if it lies within a SVT. 6. Please provide the Basis of Bearing. 7. Please provide the Basis of Elevation, including the vertical datum used. 8. Please provide a dimensioned right-of-way (ROW). 9. Please provide street monument lines and the dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. 10. Please revise the dimension of the sidewalk in the ROW to 5 feet. 11. Please provide the estimated cut and fill quantities, listed separately in measurements of cubic yards, even if the quantity is zero. 12. Please provide either a legend or Key Notes to identify existing and proposed features, such as fences, walls, curbs, etc. 13. Please provide the finished floor elevations and finished grade spot elevations. 14. Please provide existing contours. 15. The following details on sheet C5.1 are not called out on the Site Plan. Please revise accordingly. 15.1. A1, A2, A3, A5, B3, C4, D2, D3, D4. 16. Per Detail B4, show there will be a minimum 5% slope a minimum of 10 feet from all edges of the proposed buildings, specifically where the buildings are lined up against the Drainage Easement. 17. The following details on sheet C5.2 are not called out on the Site Plan. Please revise accordingly. 17.1. B1, B2, B3 (for Lot 9), C2, D2, D3. 18. Truncated domes are required on all sidewalk ramps where the interface of the pavement or vehicle use area and the pedestrian area do not have a vertical separation. The area where the truncated domes are required is 6 inches wide back from the interface, a minimum 2 feet deep and extending the width of the interface. Please revise Details D2 and D3 on Sheet C5.2 to reflect this. 19. Please call out the handicapped ramps for all proposed locations, including the parking ramps. 20. Final Plat General Note No. 9 states that permanent structures, including masonry walls, fences, etc., are not allowed within the sewer easement without the written consent of Pima County Wastewater. Please provide the written consent as noted or relocate the solid waste enclosures. 21. Please revise the solid waste enclosure to the enclosed detail. The minimum outside width of a solid waste enclosure is 14 feet, which will cause part of it to encroach into the existing Drainage Easement. Please address this in the Drainage Statement. 22. Please provide a minimum 25-foot curb return radius at all drive aprons. 23. Please provide a minimum 18-foot curb return radius for all PAAL intersections. 24. Please demonstrate maneuverability for the solid waste vehicles with the proposed locations of the dumpsters. 25. The Land Use Code (LUC) 3.7.4.3.B requires storm water harvesting for supplemental onsite irrigation purposes. Please provide water-harvesting techniques on your next submittal. 26. Please provide drainage flow arrows, with supporting spot elevations, to show drainage into the areas of water harvesting. Further comments may be forthcoming as details are added to the initial site plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Suzanne Bohnet, CFM, Engineer Associate (520) 791-5550 x1188 office Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/19/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera Lead Planner Principal Planner PROJECT:T06CM04785 and T06CM04805 3150 & 3162 N. Freeway Industrial Loop Site Plans Transmittal date: 1st Review 9/27/06 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 The listed property description is not complete. Include lot #8 in the description. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.3 The correct address for this project is on Freeway Industrial Loop. Revise the address in the notes and indicate the correct street name on the plans. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.4 The location map will provide the following information. 1. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as subdivisions, major streets, major watercourses, and railroads. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 2. Section corners will be labeled. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.5 Provide lot dimension and bearing for the southwest corner of lot #9. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.6 Provide the height of the exterior walls measured from grade for the proposed structures. Required in order to determine the required setbacks. 6. DS 2-01.2.1.7 The indicated street perimeter yard setback is incorrect. The required setback from the street property line is 20' or 11/2 times the height of the structure, which ever is greater. If the height of the exterior wall is 25' a setback of 37.5' would be required. Revise. The required perimeter yard setback from the northeast property line is 1/12 times the height of the structure. See LUC 3.2.6.4, development designator "DD" adjacent to R-1 zoned property. See comment #16 7. DS 2-02.2.1.8 This project is two separate parcels and each parcel must be able to stand alone. Provide parking calculations for each parcel separately. The parking calculations as indicated are incorrect. A total of 64 parking spaces are required if the use is parked at a ratio of 1:500. A cross parking and cross vehicular and pedestrian access agreement will be required to be provided. Provide a copy of the agreement and recordation information (docket and page) on the site plan. Use a heavier line weight to indicate parking spaces, sidewalks, handicap ramps, curbs, bicycle parking locations, etc. Required in order to create readable copies and for record keeping clarity. The handicap sign shown in detail A1/C5.1 is not correct. I have attached a copy of the correct signage for a handicap parking space. Clearly indicate the location of the handicap parking sign on the detail B1/C5.1. Note: sign cannot be located so as to decrease the width of the sidewalk to less than 4'. Indicate the minimum height above grade for the handicap parking sign. Minimum as required by the City of Tucson is 7'-0" to the bottom of the sign. 8. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide the number and location of required Class 1 bicycle parking spaces as well as a detail of the locker type. See LUC Sec. 3.3.4 and DS 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces are to be located no more than 50' from the main entrance and must provide clearances as per DS 2-09.5.1 without blocking pedestrian circulation path. Clearly indicate the required aisle width for the bicycle parking spaces as per DS 2-09.5.2. Clearly indicate bicycle parking area delineation as per DS 2-09.5.6. Revise calculations. 9. DS 2-02.2.1.11 Indicate by dimension the widths of all PAAL's. Missing along the northeast ends of the buildings and the northwest side of building 1. 10. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Provide a 5' striped pedestrian refuge area along the north side of building 1. See DS 3-05.2.2.B.1. An accessible pedestrian circulation path is required from the parking spaces at the southern side of the project connecting to both buildings. (sidewalk, handicap ramps, cross walk, etc.) On the site plan indicate the locations of the required handicap ramps. Access ramps at crosswalks and access aisles connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 11. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide location, type, size and height of any existing or proposed signage including billboards. 12. DS 2-02.2.1.14 A loading zone will be required for each building and located in close proximity to each building.. See LUC Sec.3.4.1 Provide dimensions for all loading zones. Revise calculations. 13. DS 2-02.2.1.20 As per the final plat for this subdivision, no walls or structures are allowed to be constructed within the 20' sewer easement without written permission from Pima County. Provide documentation allowing the walls, landscape, refuse containers, etc. to be built in the easement. Provide recording documentation (docket and page) for the indicated ingress/egress easement. 14. DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide proposed lighting layout and type. 15. DS 2-02.2.1.28 The zoning for the adjacent property to the northeast side of the project (railroad) is R1 not I1 as indicated. Revise. 16. DS 2-02.2.1.31 The indicated proposed use of "Industrial" is a use group not a specific use. Provide the specific use for this project with the "subject to:" sections applicable as per LUC 2.7.22.A, .1 thru .8. Clearly indicate how all subject to sections of the proposed use are complied with. 17. Based on changes to the plans and responses to the comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. |
| 09/27/2006 | SREEVES1 | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/28/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |