Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Permit Number - T06CM04763
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-REVISION/OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2008 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/04/2008 | DROBEY1 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed | |
| 02/08/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/20/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/21/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | A demand flow of 100 GPM through a 2" water meter results in an excessive pressure drop and a velocity greater than the maximum 8 FPS allowed for either plastic or copper piping. In addition, Tucson Water limits the 2" meter to a maximum demand of 80 GPM. Reference Sections 610.2 and 610.12, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2008 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |