Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM04598
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/17/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please show location and/or dimension to nearest existing fire hydrants. Also, be aware that fire separation by fire wall or 6 feet clear between new and existing duplex will be required or provide automatic fire sprinkler system. |
| 08/21/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 08/21/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a separate landscape plan per DS 2-07.0. to verify that entire site meets current minimum requirements. 2. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 4. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 5. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 6. Show on site plan existing and future sight visibility triangles DS 2-02.2.2.1.A.10 7. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following Information: § Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material must be listed. § Locations, size, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place. § Material and areas of inert ground cover. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Indicate treatment for landscaped areas. 8. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 9. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from office zoned property per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 10. Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C 11. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 12. Remove any unnecessary notes pertaining to landscape including Site Plan Keynote #29 and Project Data notes indicating Landscape provided and Landscape required. 13. Additional comments may apply. |
| 09/08/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Raymond Clamons DATE: September 8, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Division SUBJECT: 944 N. Alvernon Way New Duplex Site plan T06CM04598 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan with your next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please provide a Site Plan with all dimensions drawn to scale. 2. Alvernon Way is a Major Street and Route with a future right-of-way (ROW) width of 120 feet. Please show future ROW, future curb, and future sidewalk area as measured from street monument lines. 3. Please provide the existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVT). 4. Please provide the Basis of Bearing. 5. Please provide the Basis of Elevation, including the vertical datum used. 6. Please provide street monument lines. 7. Please provide a legend and include different symbols for the different types of existing fencing. 8. Please provide a detail sheet (Note: Sheets 1 and 2 of 4 were all that was submitted for review. If a detail sheet exists, please provide with revised Site Plan for review. More comments may be forthcoming after the detail sheet review.) 9. Please clarify why there are steps at the back of the new duplex (Keynote No. 55). 10. The following Keynotes were not called out on the Site Plan: Keynote Nos. 10, 12, 19, 20, 28, 36, 38, 39, and 47. Please verify if these Keynotes are specific to this Site Plan and call them out accordingly. 11. Please clarify if that section of the existing chain link fence on the western property line will be removed for refuse/recycle pick-up and call out on Site Plan. 12. Please provide a detail for Keynote No. 33 that shows the new concrete walk area will accommodate existing drainage. Please include spot elevations. 13. Please provide the estimated cut and fill quantities, listed separately in measurements of cubic yards, even if the quantity is zero. 14. Please correct the word "detachable" in Keynote No. 14 to be "detectable". 15. Please confirm the gate on the north property line is to be removed and relocated (currently shown as existing at the end of the new brick paver area). 16. Please show Keynote No. 56 for both carport posts and add the dimensions of the posts to the Keynote. 17. Keynote No. 50 states the existing driveway apron is to be relocated. It is unclear from that description that the driveway apron is to be expanded from 20 feet to 24 feet. Please clarify. 18. Please provide existing and finished topography, by contours and/or spot elevations. 19. Please provide drainage flow arrows, with supporting spot elevations, to support existing drainage will remain the same. 20. The 6-inch curb on the eastern property line located in the "No Parking Area" is required to be a minimum 3 feet distance from an obstruction taller than it is per DS 3-05.2.2.D. Please revise. 21. The Land Use Code (LUC) 3.7.4.3.B requires storm water harvesting for supplemental onsite irrigation purposes. Please provide water-harvesting techniques on your next submittal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Suzanne Bohnet, CFM, Engineer Associate (520) 791-5550 x1188 office Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/15/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 944 N. Alvernon Way - Apartment Addition T06CM04598 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 18, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). 2. Add a note to the plan stating "THIS SITE PLAN IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE AND GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE". 3. Provide a copy of the existing and proposed floor plans along with the proposed elevation. 4. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size. This is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or when photographically reduced (microfilmed) for records. 5. Provide lot bearings. D.S. 2-02.1.5 6. Provide existing and proposed building and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use. D.S. 2-02.1.6 7. The building setback to the south & east property line does not meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.6.4. The required setback is 10'-0" or ¾ the height of exterior building wall, which ever is greatest, based on an exterior wall height of 8'-2" the minimum setback would be 10'-0". Proposed setback is 7'-0" a Design Development Option (DDO) will be required. See attached paperwork. Add to the plan the DDO case number, date of approval and conditions. The DDO will need to be approved prior to approval of this site plan. D.S. 2-02.1.7 8. Zoning is unable to verify the setback to the street until the future curb along Alvernon Way is shown on the plan. This setback 21'-0" or the height of exterior building wall, which ever is greatest measured from the back of future curb location. Future curb is based on the Major Streets and Routes right-of-way of 120 feet. D.S. 2-02.1.7 9. Zoning is unable to verify the required setback for the proposed storage shed to the north property line, provide the height of the shed wall. This setback is the height of the wall. The shed must meet the required setback or a setback waiver from the adjacent owner must be added to the plan, see attached. D.S. 2-02.1.7 10. Provide the dimensions between the existing building and the proposed building. D.S. 2-02.1.7 11. The parallel parking space shown does not meet LUC 3.3.7.I requirements. The minimum length for this space is 23'-0". D.S. 2-02.1.7 12. Provide typical details for the handicapped and standard parking spaces. D.S. 2-02.1.8 13. A one-foot setback is required between the covered parking and the PAAL. D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2 14. Please explain the requirement for the "NO PARKING ALLOWED" area. D.S. 2-02.1.8 15. The backup spur shown on the East end of the parking area requires a minimum distance of 3 feet between the curb and the fence. D.S. 3-05.2.2.D 16. It appears that the "EXISTING ROLLING GATE" called out in Keynote 43 is less then 24 foot in width. This gate cannot reduce the required width of the 24 foot two way PAAL. Please clarify. LUC 3.3.7.2 17. Offstreet bicycle parking - Provide a fully dimensioned layout for the Class 2, bicycle parking areas. Provide a detail for the Class 2 bicycle storage, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the type of directional signage. D.S. 2-02.1.9 Ensure that you use Supplement No. 9 City of Tucson Bicycle Parking Design. 18. Provide both the existing and future Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT's) for the PAAL. D.S. 2-02.1.10 19. It appears that the vehicle overhang near the Northwest corner of the proposed structure will restrict the 4 foot required sidewalk width, please clarify. D.S. 2-02.1.12 20. Provide a detail for the handicapped access ramp at the proposed handicapped parking space. D.S. 2-02.1.12 21. It is unclear how handicapped accessibility is to be handled at the street sidewalk and entrance PAAL. Provide clarification. Access ramps with truncated domes may be required, see engineering comments. D.S. 2-02.1.12 22. The future right-of-way for Alvernon Way is 120', revise drawing to reflect the future right-of-way. The existing as shown on the plan does not scale, revise the existing to reflect what is currently provided. D.S. 2-02.1.19 23. Label Alvernon Way as an MS&R route. D.S. 2-02.1.19 24. Provide existing and proposed lighting layout and types. D.S. 2-02.1.25 25. Please provide "EXISTING & PROPOSED USE" along with the Development Designator "P" and Subject To LUC Sec. 3.5.7.1.F on the plan. LUC 2.3.6.2.A.2, D.S. 2-02.1.31 26. Provide a letter from John Clark, Pima County Solid Waste which states that Solid Waste approves the proposed solid waste storage and pick-up, see Engineering comments. D.S. 2-02.1.32 (May need a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) if standard is not met.) 27. Provide the floor area for each building. D.S. 2-02.2.A.2. The 'GROSS FLOOR AREA" under PARKING CALULATIONS does not match the square footage listed under GROSS FLOOR AREA/OCCUPANCY USE. 28. Provide a Lot Coverage and Density Calculation on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.A.3. 29. Vehicular and bicycle parking space calculations cannot be verified until floor plans are provided. D.S. 2-02.2.A.24. Parking for residential is based on the number of bedrooms in each unit per LUC 3.3.4. 30. The percent of building expansion appears to be incorrect. Please revise and remove reference to "MODEL ENERGY CODE". D.S. 2-02.2.A.6 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm04598.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/21/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2006 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/28/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |