Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM04401
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T06CM04401 1937 N. Corte El Rancho Merita Site Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/08/2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning will not be able to approve this site plan until the WASH overlay review has been completed and approved. 2. Clearly indicate that the sidewalk provide from the street to the house will be an accessible route, as per the tentative plat. See sheet 3 of 5 notes 3 and 5 under the DSMR approval conditions. Provide the max. cross slope (2%) and max. running slope (5%) for the sidewalk leading to the proposed porch. Stone pavers are not allowed for an accessible route, the surface of the sidewalk must be a stable, firm, and slip resistant. Contact Ron Brown at 837-4908 for allowable surface materials for an accessible route. 3. Per the LUC Sec. 3.2.6.3 averaging of setbacks is allowed. Provide on the site plan the location of the posts for the proposed porch with dimensions to the property line from the posts and where the porch attaches to the house These dimensions are required in order to verify correct averaging of the required setbacks. The site plan with the proposed porch being inset from the north corner of the addition creates a new wall line which must meet the required average setback. By scaling the plan at the porch wall line to the property line it does not appear to meet the average 20' required setback. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T06CM04401-3.doc |
| 08/12/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This project requires a WASH overlay review with regulations in accordance with the DSD - Full Notice Procedure, TCC 23A-50 and 23A-51. The site plan application will be reviewed for compliance when overlay review process is completed. 2. Include with re-submittal overlay approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed |
| 08/12/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This project requires a WASH overlay review with regulations in accordance with the DSD - Full Notice Procedure, Sec.23A-50 and 23A-51. The site plan application will be reviewed for compliance when overlay review process is completed. 2. Include with re-submittal overlay approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed |
| 09/08/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: El Rancho Merlita L.L.C. DATE: September 8, 2008 Valerie Osborne FROM: Paul Machado 5711 E. Fort Lowell Road Engineering Division Tucson, Arizona 85712 SUBJECT: 1937 N. Corte El Rancho Merlita Site plan T06CM04401 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 04 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Per previous comment. 3. A floodplain use permit is required. Per previous comment. The site plan cannot be approved prior to the FUP. Although the verification of the exist. bank protection allows continuance with the proposed improvements, the existing flood plain, per the FEMA panel, is mapped over the existing structure and must shown on the SP. Therefore a CLOMR or LOMR is required to change the 100 year FEMA flood plain limit line. 4. FYI - The proposed improvements to the exist. structure in the FEMA regulated flood plain (AE Zone) cannot exceed 50% of the cost of the exist. structure alone, not including the cost of the property. Per previous comment. 5. Show cross-sections of the WSEL immediately upstream and downstream of the structure. The WSE shown do not call out any elevations. 6. It appears that the detached garage in the EHS. No structures are allowed in the EHS. Revise as required. Drainage Report: 1. The DR has been conditionally accepted for site plan purposes only. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax, C:/1937 N. Corte El Rancho Merlita Site 3 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2008 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/24/2008 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |