Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM04401
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 02/14/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T06CM04401 1937 N. Corte El Rancho Merita Site Plan TRANSMITTAL: 02/15/07 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Per discussions with Engineering and Landscape staff, this project will require a WASH overlay review. Contact Patricia Gehlen for the information on how to proceed with a WASH overlay submittal. Zoning will not be able to approve this site plan until the overlay review has been completed and approved. 2. Clearly indicate the type of materials used for the driveways, sidewalks and the pedestrian refuge area, which must be an accessible route, as per the tentative plat. See sheet 3 of 5 notes 3 and 5 under the DSMR approval conditions. Note number 4 of the above DSMR conditions indicates the requirement for a sidewalk connecting from the driveway to the front door. Indicate location and surface materials for this required sidewalk. 3. Clearly indicate the location of all utilities, sewer, gas, electric and water lines on the site plan.. 4. Per the LUC Sec. 3.2.6.3 averaging of setbacks is allowed. Provide on the site plan the location of the posts for the porch with dimensions to the property line from the posts. Provide a dimension from the corner of the new addition where it joins the existing structure. These dimensions are required in order to verify correct averaging of the required setbacks. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T06CM04401.doc |
| 02/15/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/21/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Exhibit D (Wash Ordinance Mitigation Plan for El Rancho Merlita) submitted only shows a portion of Lot 12 additional information is required. 2) Applicants proposing a project with encroachment into the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Sec. 6.2.5 of the LUC. |
| 02/21/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Exhibit D (Wash Ordinance Mitigation Plan for El Rancho Merlita) submitted only shows a portion of Lot 12 additional information is required. 2) Applicants proposing a project with encroachment into the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Sec. 6.2.5 of the LUC. |
| 03/01/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Show the locations of the utility lines for water, sewer, and gas |
| 03/12/2007 | SREEVES1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/22/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: El Rancho Merlita L.L.C. DATE: April 5, 2007 Valerie Osborne 5711 E. Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 SUBJECT: 1937 N. Corte El Rancho Merlita Site plan T06CM04401 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 04 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. 4. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 5. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 7. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. Label all washes. 8. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 9. Show Site plan number (T06CM04401) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 11. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 12. A floodplain use permit is required. 13. "A grading permit will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 14. Separate grading note 11 into two notes. The grading note shall read "All grading shall be in conformance with the City of Tucson Development Standards 11-01 Excavating and Grading". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Calculate and show the erosion hazard setback. Show where ehs is in comparison to the key-in of the exist. bank protection. 3. The toe-down of the exist bank protection is shown on the detail having a depth of 2 feet. Which according to the scour calculations should be adequate. However the statement on page 3 of the DR states that "DCC has no means to verify all aspects of the as-built bank protection…..". In order for the City of Tucson to accept the bank protection as-built, the bank protection must be verified. 4. Due to the nature and extent of the comments listed here, additional comments may be required on the next submittal. 5. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 737-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1937 N. Corte El Rancho Merlita Site |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2007 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/09/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |