Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T06CM04339
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2006 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 2. Provide site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 3. The provided information is inadequate to review the natural gas piping. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 4. An air gap fitting is not an approved termination for the T&P relief drain. 5. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference Section 414.1, UPC 2003 and Section 804.3, IECC 2003. 6. Provide the manufacturer's information for the proposed reduced pressure backflow assembly that shows that the pressure drop is only 5 PSI. 7. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. |
| 07/26/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2003 International Mechanical Code and the 2003 International Energy Conservation Code, both with Local Amendments, are the relevant codes for this project. 2. This project is located in jurisdiction of the City of Tucson. 3. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. |
| 09/13/2006 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND JUSTIFY PER THE 2003 IBC. 2) TEXT SIZE ON DRAWINGS NEED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/8" AND ALL CAPS |
| 09/13/2006 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 09/13/2006 | JMORALE1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2006 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |