Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM04300
Parcel: 13208006C

Address:
1991 E AJO WY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T06CM04300
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2007 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
01/10/2007 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Note: Plumbing plans have not been included in the current submittal. Refer to the amended comments 1 through 5 from 08/16/06.
1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. All of the submitted water calculations are based on the 2003 International Plumbing Code. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments.
3. Coordinate the plumbing and civil drawings to show the route of the building water supplies from the water meter to the buildings, along with the sizes of the reduced pressure backflow preventer assemblies. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
4. The 2-way cleanout detail on sheet P2.1 is in violation of Section 707.6, UPC 2003.
5. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2003.
01/22/2007 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/24/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Southgate Business Park
T06CM04297, T06CM04298, T06CM04299, T06CM04300, T06CM04301,
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 24, 2007

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. The tentative plat/development plan has been revised and is currently under review. The revised tentative plat/development plan, once approved, must be resubmitted for site plan approval. Once the site plan has been approved include two (2) copies of the approved site plan with your next building plan submittal. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields,
(520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\building\t06cm04297-2nd.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved and stamped site plan and additional requested documents
01/31/2007 CHRISTY FOREMAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T06CM04300.. 1983 EAST AJO WAY .. RETAIL SHELL BUILDING #1/ 'D' .. CDF .. 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS .. 1/30/07 ..

TRANSMIT PRIOR SUBMITTAL/S WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

Provide a Response Letter, by the Registrant of Record, with the re-submittal addressing each comment listed in Structural Review.

S1 Provide Code Analysis data on architectural site plan AS-100 Clarifying allowable and actual sq. footage.

S2 It appears that the actual sq. footage is different than what is shown on the site plans. Please have development plans, architectural site plan, and G-001 square footage match.

S3 Shell Occupancies are (M)-retail, (S-1)-warehouse, and (B)-office on the drawings. If occupancy sq. footages change at time of tenant improvements additional fees may be owed.

S4 Show landings required at doors, per IBC Section 1008.1.4, on drawings ref A-100.

S5 Submit two sets of shop drawings and calculations, stamped and signed by an Arizona Registered engineer, shop drawings shall be reviewed by and bear the approval of the Engineer or Architect of Record prior to submission to the City of Tucson, Development Services Department for approval prior to erection for:
1. Door hardware, ref drawing A-600.
2. Skylights.
3. Roof hatch.
4. Ladder for roof hatch.
5. Overhead door.
6. Prefabricated wood joists.
7. Steel decking.
8. Structural steel.

S6 Mezzanines are now a part of scope of work. Therefore stairs and accessible route will need to be clarified. Address accessibility requirements for Multilevel buildings, per IBC Section 1104.4, indicate on drawings how accessibility will be provided to future mezzanine.

S7 Wall type 'C' note specifies 2 x4 stud and conflicts with note S25 of response comments. Sht S201 and A-100 conflict on specifications.

S8 State how uplift calculated on sheet 1.7 of Calculations is resisted. Please add new calculations with structural calculation package stamped and approved by Structural Engineer.

S9 Provide Special Inspection forms as required by the 1997 Uniform Administrative Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tucson, Section 306 for ;
1. Masonry.
2. Soils observation and testing for site surface preparation (excavation and grading).
3. Soils observation and testing for foundation excavation.
4. Soils observation and testing for backfilling and compaction.
5. Concrete.
6. Field welding.
7. Shop welding.
8. Bolts in concrete.
9. Reinforcement.
10. Expansion anchors.
11. Epoxy anchors.

S10 Dimension location of type C2 column on foundation plan.

S11 Clarify where diaphragm nailing specified on structural calculations is specified on structural drawings.


Questions? Call Christy Foreman Structural Plans Examiner for the City of Tucson Development Services Department at (520) 791-5550 x1108, email at <Christy.Foreman@tucsonaz.gov. or visit City of Tucson , DSD website : www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd.
01/31/2007 SREEVES1 WWM REVIEW Denied 1) SHELL BLDG #4 ONLY-NEEDS TO PERMIT PRIVATE SEWER FOR SOUTHGATE BUSINESS PARK- LOTS #1-#5 (BUILDINGS #1 TO #6) PERMIT pt06s04668.
2) NEEDS WW/DSC 1ST FLOOR HOLD HARMLESS LETTER TO CONNECT TO PRIVATE SEWER WHICH CONNECTS TO A PUBLIC. WHICH HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED & ACCEPTED BY PCWWM-740-6503
01/31/2007 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved 1. The shell design package is part of a phased construction program and does not result in a building with a certificate of occupancy. Section 101.2.1.2, IECC 2003 is only applicable to buildings that either are not intended to be for human occupancy or for which the primary purpose of the building is not to provide for human comfort. Energy code compliance calculations for the envelope are required for the shell building even if no mechanical systems are to be initially installed. Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2003.
2. Details 4 and 5, sheet A-301 shows an access ladder with dimensions that comply with the requirements of Section 306.5, IMC 2003 but detail B1 on sheet A-105 shows the same ladder with incorrect dimensions.
03/01/2007 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/01/2007 FSANCHE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed