Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM04300
Parcel: 13208006C

Address:
1991 E AJO WY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T06CM04300
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/16/2006 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please add the following automatic sprinkler criteria to the plans:

1. The hazard classification of the occupancy including any special hazards.
2. The design standard to be used.
3. The availability and adequacy of the water supply.
4. The design density and the area of operation.
08/16/2006 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. Coordinate the architectural and plumbing drawings to depict the same building. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
3. All of the submitted water calculations are based on the 2003 International Plumbing Code. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments.
4. Coordinate the plumbing and civil drawings to show the route of the building water supplies from the water meter to the buildings, along with the sizes of the reduced pressure backflow preventer assemblies. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003.
5. The 2-way cleanout shown on sheet P2.1 is in violation of Section 707.6, UPC 2003.
6. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2003.
7. Provide location and sizing information for the downspouts. Reference Section 1106.0, UPC 2003.
08/16/2006 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building. Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2003.
2. Show that the design of the roof access complies with Section 306.5, IMC 2003.
08/16/2006 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/24/2006 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
2. Single Line Diagram numbering of Available Fault Currents is erroneous for those greater than F7.
3. Keynote 5 on Sheet E1.3, which calls for the Panel HPD circuit breakers to be series rated 35K/10K with the upstream fused switch, would not provide adequate fault protection for the AFC at that switch, which is to be installed in SES-D. Besides that, it implies a 3-tiered series rated system. If the intent is to rate the MCB at this panel with its downstream CBs 35K/10K, please clarify this note.
4. Please evaluate Keynotes 1 and 2 with the same concept as that in Comment #3 above. In all
5. Note 2 by the fault calculations calls for all panels to be fully rated, which contradicts the Keynotes which specify series ratings. Please clarify.
6. Demonstrate compliance with the Tucson Lighting Code,
http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/Tucson_Lighting_Code.pdf.
08/25/2006 BETSY COTTLE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
09/15/2006 DOUG LAAKSO BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied .. T06CM04300 .. 1991 EAST AJO WAY .. RETAIL SHELL BUILDING #4/ 'D' .. DGL .. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS .. 9/15/06 ..

TRANSMIT PRIOR SUBMITTAL/S WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

Provide a Response Letter, by the Registrant of Record, with the re-submittal addressing each comment listed in Structural Review.

S1. Provide completed Commercial Plan Submittal Checklist for each Permit Application by Architect of Record, including: Signature of Architect/Engineer of Record, Registration number of Registrant of Record, Date form is completed, Job Address and Acknowledge items listed on this Checklist are in this Submittal by checking the adjacent square. See DSD website : www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd, for form.
S2. Provide completed Code Review Checklist for each Permit Application, as required by 1997 Uniform Administrative Code Section 302.1, including: Job Address, Architect, Signature, Date, Summary of Governing Regulations, General Building Summary and Allowable Area Calculation. See DSD website : www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd, for form.
S3. Provide a complete submittal of all drawings for Building Permits, including Civil (grading and paving) referenced on G-001.
S4. Verify/Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8 inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997.
S5. Provide a Site Plan with clearly and properly annotated property lines and imaginary property lines if used in code analysis, show adequate finished grade elevations to indicate accessibility conforms to IBC and ANSI A117.1-2003 ed, indicate the Accessible Route to a public way, dimension this Shell Building and other structures on the Site, dimension buildings from two adjacent property lines and from adjacent buildings and imaginary property lines, also indicate Occupancy and Type of Construction of this Shell Building and other structures on the Site.
S6. Provide notes on drawings:
1. Items indicated as future require Separate Permit/s prior to construction.
2. Separate Permits are required for Tenant Improvements/Occupancy, prior to construction/occupancy.
S7. Clarify a single Occupancy for this building, per the 2003 IBC, on the drawings, due to differing Occupancies being called-out at various locations, including (M)-retail, (S-1)-warehouse, (B)-office on the drawings, choose one Occupancy for shell building for this Permit.
S8. Provide size and location/s of skylights and roof scuttle on Roof Plan, by dimension and by dimensioning from two adjacent walls and provide structural details for openings in roof diaphragm.
S9. Explain how future roof-mounted is accommodated on the architectural and structural drawings and in the structural calculations.
S10. Because of the presence of the 12' wide roll-up doors please explain the use or presence of motorized vehicles inside this building, ref IBC Section 406.
S11. Provide addressing per Pima County Addressing Ordinance and IBC section 501.2 on the drawings, ref drawing A-200.
S12. Because the mezzanine and loading dock is future it will not be reviewed or approved as a part of this Plan Review or Approval process a future Separate Permit/s will be required prior to construction, please delete from Structural Drawings as well to clarify this Permit Submittal, if you have concerns about this, please express them here.
S13. Explain lot lines with regard for requirements of IBC.
S14. Indicate proposed fire-rated walls, if any, on Site Plan AS-100.
S15. Provide Fire-sprinkler Design Criteria on the drawings per IBC and Fire Code.
S16. Show Occupant Load on drawings based on a single Building Occupancy for this Shell Building per IBC Section 1004.
S17. Show on drawings signage at egress doors stating: "THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED" per IBC Section 1008.1.8.3, ref drawing A-600.
S18. Show on drawings how wrought iron man gates conform to requirements for means of egress system per IBC Section 1008.
S19. Show landings required at doors, per IBC Section 1008.1.4, on drawings ref A-100.
S20. Submit two sets of shop drawings and calculations, stamped and signed by an Arizona Registered engineer, shop drawings shall be reviewed by and bear the approval of the Engineer or Architect of Record prior to submission to the City of Tucson, Development Services Department for approval prior to erection for:
1. Door hardware, ref drawing A-600.
2. Skylights.
3. Roof hatch.
4. Ladder for roof hatch.
5. Overhead door.
6. Prefabricated wood joists.
7. Steel decking.
8. Structural steel.
9. Wood glu-lam beams.
10. 8' High wrought iron fence.
S21. Revise Guards at loading dock are required to comply with IBC Section 1012.3 Opening limitations shall have balusters or ornamental pattern such that a 4 inch diameter sphere cannot pass through any opening up to a height of 34 inches. From a height of 34 inches to 42 inches above the adjacent walking surfaces, a sphere 8 inches in diameter shall not pass.
S22. Indicate Accessible Route, per IBC Section 1104 and ANSI A117.1-2003ed, on the Site Plan.
S23. Address accessibility requirements for Multilevel buildings, per IBC Section 1104.4, indicate on drawings how accessibility will be provided to future mezzanine.
S24. Show on drawing A-100 Accessible Entrances, per IBC Section 1105 and ANSI A117.1.
S25. Designate a minimum of two van accessible parking spaces distributed on Site Plan, provide parking space and access aisle with dimensions, grade elevations, details and signage identifying as van accessible, per IBC Section 1106, signage per IBC Section 1110 and ANSI A117.1 Section 502.
S26. Provide accessible parking space w/details on drawings, per IBC Section 1106, signage per IBC Section 1110 and ANSI A117.1 Section 502.
S27. Clarify studs (material, type, size, and spacing) and connection to structure above (fastener: type, size, spacing/number) of interior partition Wall Type 'C' for stud height of approximately 23 feet at room with roof hatch.
S28. Clearly show on Structural Drawings and in Structural Calculations anticipated weights and locations of Roof-mounted equipment.
S29. Provide more readable Structural Calculations for Plan Review and Record purposes, see Item #S4 above.
S30. Show structural roof framing details at roof openings, such as: Roof hatch, Skylight, etc, on Structural Drawings.
S31. Explain in Structural Calculations live load reductions used, ref sheet 1.8, B1, B2, 1.10.
S32. Clarify on Structural Drawings: if mezzanine and associated Structural is to be future as shown on Architectural Drawings, please coordinate and explain this, including the impact of this on the structure, on the Structural Drawings and Structural Calculations.
S33. Stairs to future mezzanine are NOT A PART OF THIS PERMIT will need to be a part of a Separate Permit for the mezzanine completion/Tenant Space /Occupancy Permit.
S34. State how uplift calculated on sheet 1.7 of Calculations is resisted.
S35. Clarify on Specifications and Structural Drawings wood bottom plates to be of naturally durable or preservative treated wood, per IBC Section 2304.11.
S36. Clarify on hold-down detail 113 stud for attachment of HTT22 is 4 x width as required.
S37. Provide Inspection Program as required by the 1997 Uniform Administrative Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tucson, Section 302.5.
S38. Provide Special Inspection as required by the 1997 Uniform Administrative Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tucson, Section 306 for ;
1. Masonry.
2. Soils observation and testing for site surface preparation (excavation and grading).
3. Soils observation and testing for foundation excavation.
4. Soils observation and testing for backfilling and compaction.
5. Concrete.
6. Field welding.
7. Shop welding.
8. Bolts in concrete.
9. Reinforcement.
10. Expansion anchors.
11. Epoxy anchors.
S39. Provide 18" toedown at exterior of building vs 8"min shown on detail 13/S102, or provide recommendation from Soils Engineer for toedown minimum depth at exterior of building.
S40. The minimum anchorage of masonry walls to floors and roofs and other structural elements has changed in the 2003 IBC Section 1604.8 to 280 PLF from prior 200 PLF, please revise Sheet 3.2 of Structural Calculations to acknowledge this and check for impact on Structural Design.
S41. Show location and structural details for openings through the roof diaphragm on Structural Drawings.
S42. Note to Soils Engineer the City of Tucson current Building Code is 2003 IBC vs 2000 IBC cited in Soils Report 6.2.4 , please verify conformance of the Soils Report and Design with the 2003 IBC.
S43. Verify site ground motion calculation is based on soil class designation of D, as indicated in Soils Report 6.2.4 or as adjusted for 2003 IBC, per comment S42 above, calc sheet #4.1 and 4.1 appear to be using soils class designation of 'B' vs soils class 'D' per Soils Report, revise Structural Calculations as needed.


Questions? Call Douglas Laakso Structural Plans Examiner for the City of Tucson Development Services Department at (520) 791-5550 x1111, email at <Doug.Laakso@tucsonaz.gov.> or visit City of Tucson , DSD website : www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd.
09/18/2006 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1) SHELL BLDG #4 ONLY-NEEDS TO PERMIT PRIVATE SEWER FOR SOUTHGATE BUSINESS PARK- LOTS #1-#5 (BUILDINGS #1 TO #6) PERMIT pt06s04668.
2) NEEDS WW/DSC 1ST FLOOR HOLD HARMLESS LETTER TO CONNECT TO PRIVATE SEWER WHICH CONNECTS TO A PUBLIC. WHICH HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED & ACCEPTED BY PCWWM-740-6503
09/21/2006 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building Plan denied until Site Plan approval. JG 9-21-06
09/21/2006 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Southgate Business Park
T06CM04300
Building Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2006

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields,
(520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\building\t06cm04300.doc


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved and stamped site plan and additional requested documents

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/22/2006 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/22/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed