Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T06CM04228
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2007 | MADARA ENGINEERING | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | MADARA Engineering, Inc. 4545 E. Shea Blvd. Suite 207, Phoenix, AZ 85028, phone (602) 493-1963, fax (602) 493-1967 Date: March 2, 2007 To: Don Livingstone 821 N. Montezuma Tucson, AZ 85711 Phone: (520) 403-7869 Project name: 804 N. Shepherd Hills Permit #: TO6-CM04228 Structure: SFR Occupancy: R-3/U Occupant load: 20 Construction Type: V-B Area S.F.: 5987 SF Project number: 18-6025-03 The third submittal plans for the above referenced project are in the process of Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical plan review for compliance with the City of Tucson ordinances and applicable codes. Corrections required are noted below. All corrections must be made to the original drawings and new complete and revised sets resubmitted along with a written response to each of the items listed below to facilitate a shorter back-check time. The scope of this review covers Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical review. These disciplines were checked only to the extent allowed by the documents provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Provide the calculations used to determine the percentage of glazing of the gross area of the exterior walls. Calculations to verify compliance with the 2003 International Energy Code will be required when the glazing area exceeds 15% of the gross area of the exterior walls. The calculations referenced in response were not submitted. Also revise outdoor lighting calculations to reflect correct lighting zone and area of lot (E-3, 1.32 acres) Ref. IRC Section R806. If using the TEP guidelines show outside air intake location and cfm of outdoor air on Mechanical plans as required by City of Tucson for use of the TEP guideline. Also incorporate the TEP detail into the plan sets as required by City of Tucson for use of the guidelines. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet 2 Detail F5 on Sheet 6A show 3’ square spread footing, which does not match with dimensions shown on Foundation plan. Coordinate and update. Recheck lateral shear along front wall of garage and provide calculations verifying soil pressure and uplift of footings below shear walls. Interior braced wall panels require sill to foundation connections with ½” anchor bolts described in R403.1.6, R602.10.8. Include a detail reference on Foundation plan for the interior walls identified in the analysis Sheets 7 through 11. No response has been submitted. Coordinate with Roof framing plan on Sheet 7 to determine reaction at two columns supporting girder truss between Family and Bedroom 2/ Pantry. Then specify on plans size of these columns, detail column to footing connection and recheck/ update foundations below so soil pressure not to exceed allowable. Specifically see support with 14” wide footing. Sheet 7 Provide truss calculation package or obtain permission from City of Tucson Building official if Deferred submittal for trusses is intended to be used. If so the plan review fee per City of Tucson policy will be doubled if using a Deferred submittal. Please clarify and complete. No response has been submitted. Callout details on Roof plan such as 12/6A at front entry columns, 6/6A at Bedroom 4, A/6 at shear wall between garage and Bedroom 4 appear to be incorrect or do not exist. See all marks on plan and clarify. Identify size of columns on framing plan and detail column to foundations connection. Clarify call out 9/6A between Foyer and Living room as to show beam supporting roof joists from both areas, not currently provided. If trusses are continuous as mentioned in the response, then update line of trusses which currently have an offset and graphically looks they are discontinuous at the call out. Lateral design in longitudinal direction of the house is not submitted, nor shear walls in this direction provided. Please complete. No response has been submitted. Clarify how horizontal shear along walls in front of garage was determined if 15’ tributary from total 30’ applies to Line L (per structural calculations). Address vertical shear wall type and load path from roof diaphragm to short walls in front of garage. Plans do not reflect that walls at front of garage are shear walls as designed by EOR. Please coordinate and complete. Detail all types of brace wall connections from foundation to the roof plywood (exceeding 8’), R602.10.8. No response has been submitted. Provide brace wall panel (all types) materials and appropriate nailing schedule, R602.10.6 as currently missing from plans. Ref. R602.10.6. No response has been submitted. Roof framing plan still does not specify and address all required beams and headers. Please see marked locations on plan and complete (rear covered porch, beam between Bedroom 4 and Hall, beam between Powder and Kitchen). Clarify support of last two joists of patio at Master bedroom and specify joists/ detail joist to wall. Detail 13/6A shows 6x10 front beam as continuous over supports in one line. Which in reality is different and detail shall be updated to reflect vertical support at the end of each individual beam as applicable. Section 5 1/8 x 13 ½ GLB previously noted for H5 header has been changed to 6x10, which appears overstressed at two car garage. Please recheck and clarify. Sheets 6A, 6B Coordinate with Roof framing plan and revise Detail 12/6A as it shall reflect beam to column reference. Revise/ update Detail 7/6A to reflect truss to girder truss connection rather than bean to correspond to condition called out at Roof framing plan. Specify bolt connection at gusset plate given on Details 8, 23. Notes on Foundation plan address plywood exposure I, but do not specify plywood thickness or nailing (type, size, spacing, ect.). On the other side none of the provided details reflects sheathing specification; only Detail 22 shows ½” GWB at interior shear wall, but without any nailing/ screws. Coordinate and complete and eliminate discrepancy. Revise Detail 25 to reflect girder truss under keynote 1 instead of beam as for consistency with Roof framing plan and structural responses that girder truss is the main support between Family room and Bedroom 2. PLUMBING COMMENTS – Plumbing portion has been reviewed and approved as noted on plans. MECHANICAL COMMENTS – Mechanical portion has been reviewed and approved as noted on plans. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS – Electrical portion has been reviewed and approved as noted on plans. Should you have any inquires regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact the Plan reviewer at (602) 493-1963. MADARA Engineering for the CITY OF TUCSON By: Michael Hundley Vice-President |
| 03/05/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 03/06/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/06/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |