Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T06CM04045
Parcel: 13337006G

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO

Permit Number - T06CM04045
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/18/2006 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Approv-Cond Site plan as required for grading plan approval.

Provide horizontal control for grading limits.

Matt Flick
Engineering Manager
07/20/2006 SREEVES1 BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Needs Review
08/01/2006 PETER MCLAUGHLIN NPPO REVIEW Denied 1) The project is subject to the provisions of the Scenic Corridor (SCZ) Overlay Zone, LUC 2.8.2, and the Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) LUC 2.8.1. An overlay zone application is required for this project. In order to review the site plan, all existing and proposed structures and vehicle use area must be shown on the plan, along with required calculations, building setbacks, heights, dimensions, etc. Add all required SCZ and HDZ notes and calculations to the plan. Applications for projects within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) shall be reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. Contact Patricia Gehlen-Zoning Manager for application information. The decision to approve or deny the project will be based on the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.2 and LUC 2.8.1. Upon approval of the overlay zone application, add the SCZ/HDZ case number, date of approval and conditions imposed as a general note on the site plan, and add the case number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the site, grading, landscape and NPPO plans.
LUC 2.8.1.5.B
LUC 2.8.2.11
DS 2-02

2) There are lines two parallel lines running east and west across the property and labeled with distances and bearings as though the property has been split or is proposed to be split into three lots. Please clarify. If the property has been recently split provide copies of approved lot split documents. If a lot split is proposed and has not been approved submit all required lot split information. If the number of splits in the last twenty years has exceeded the maximum allowed, a subdivision plat will be required. If applicable, provide a copy of required recorded cross access agreements and add recordation information to the development plan. If the property is not to be split, remove these lines from all plans to more clearly indicate that the subject property is to remain as one parcel.

3) Further comments may apply once the above comments are addressed.

4) Revise the street name in the drawing on sheet 1 of the site plan to be consistent with the address of 1075 North Circle "D" Way.
08/28/2006 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied see comments under the grading permit application t06 bu01146

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/31/2006 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/31/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed