Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM03998
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Remove backflow preventer from Fire Service line 2) Gate must be minimum 20' wide, unobstructed. Gate must have Fire Department approved lock box. 3) Need access from fire hydrant on Highway Drive onto property |
| 07/10/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 07/10/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 2. Include the location and height of each screening element per DS 2-07.2.2.3. Identify 6' wall for loading zone on the landscape plan. 3. Plant selection for landscaping is from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 9-06.0. Abronia villosa Sand Verbena is no longer on the list choose alternate plant material. 4. Add note to landscape plan pertaining to: All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. 5. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. 6. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per acre must be provided, 33% of tress shall be 24" box or larger. A minimum of 2 shrubs for each tree is required per DS 10.01. Revise landscape plan to include basin(s) treatment. 7. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/04/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 4, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM03998 PROJECT NAME: Pool Corp PROJECT ADDRESS: 4055 North Highway Drive PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Provide the curve data for the property lines. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5. 2. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area with a 4' sidewalk must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. Where the shed is immediately adjacent to the 24' PAAL, a sidewalk (pedestrian circulation) should be provided. Extend the proposed sidewalk to the northeast corner of the shed. Revise plan as necessary. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1., Figure 1 and DS 2-08.4.1.B. 3. Sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of a curb, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. Differentiate on the site plan a grade difference for the sidewalk from the structure to the ROW. DS 2-08.4.1. 4. A back up spur within a PAAL is required to have a minimum of three (3) feet in depth and a three (3) foot radii. Show on the plan dimensions for the backup spur depth and radii. DS 3-05.2.2.D. 5. In addition to the above comment pedestrian circulation should continue around the shed to the proposed building. Sidewalk does not need to be shown within this area, however a striped pedestrian circulation should be provided. 6. It is not clear if there is existing curb for Runway Drive, Gardner Lane and Highway Drive. If there is no curb located within each of the referenced streets, indicate the edge of pavement from the centerline of each street. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 7. Provide the recordation data (book and page) of each street. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 8. Provide the benchmark and the City of Tucson Datum; include the book and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 9. Add a general note to the plan that the entire property lies within a FEMA floodplain Zone AO Depth of 1' and a floodplain use permit is required for any development on this property. 10. Please note that any mechanical equipment; water heaters, air conditioning systems, coolers, etc, must be elevated one foot above the water surface elevation and certified on the same elevation certificate for the structure. Chapter 26.5.2. 11. Be advised once construction is complete, a condition of this permit contains a requirement that the applicant, or the applicant's authorized representative, complete a FEMA Elevation Certificate and is returned to the Development Services Department (DSD) Engineering Division prior to approval of final inspection. The original elevation certificate must be returned to the DSD Engineering Division. 12. Indicate general drainage patterns on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 13. Add note to the site plan, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." 14. Provide on the site plan the 100-year peak discharge for Concentration points 1-3, that is discussed in the drainage report, section A and shown on figure 4; the offsite watershed map. 15. It is not clear why the landscape borders have a 3:1 slope. Clarify in detail in the response letter why the borders are sloped. Typically water harvesting is required in landscape borders unless the borders are being used for a drainage solution. Again please clarify in the response letter. If 3:1 slopes are not necessary provide water harvesting in the landscape borders. Show the depth of the water harvesting areas in the landscape border, either by a general note or label on the plan. 16. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. 17. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG) for an ingress/egress to a local street 18' curb returns are required. If curb is not located in the ROW provide the concrete headers for the City of Tucson to tie into when the roads are improved with curbs. If curb is within the ROW provide 18' curb returns for the ingress/egresses to both Runway Drive and Highway Drive. TMAG was adopted on March 17, 2003 by Mayor and Council. 18. A minimum of one 15-foot-wide vehicular access ramp shall be provided into each basin. The maximum roadway or access ramp slope shall not exceed 15 percent. Provide a ramp for basin maintenance. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4.b. 19. Additional comments could be forthcoming depending on how each comment has been addressed. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. In the drainage report there are several references to Pima County requirements. Remove all references to County requirements. This project is in the city limits and City of Tucson requirements apply. Revise appropriately. 2. It is recommended to use a more detailed detention/retention checklist. See the submitted document, "Maintenance Checklist for Detention/Retention Requirements." This document can be utilized or verbiage can be pulled to create a more detailed checklist. 3. New commercial developments over an acre in size are required to provide five year threshold retention. The volumetric difference between developed and the existing 5-year runoff must be addressed in the report. Discuss in the drainage report how the requirements are satisfied. 4. The maximum disposal time of 12 hours must be demonstrated for the stormwater runoff for retention. Provide a percolation test must show a maximum disposal time of 12 hours. 5. The Geotechnicial report states on page 14 (Surface Drainage Section) that in areas where sidewalks or paving do not immediately adjoin structure a minimum grad of 5 percent for at least 10 feet from perimeter walls." Describe how the proposed drainage swale will meet this recommendation. GEOTECHNICIAL REPORT COMMENTS 1. The maximum disposal time of 12 hours must be demonstrated for the stormwater runoff for retention. Provide a percolation test must show a maximum disposal time of 12 hours. (repeat of drainage report comment 4) |
| 08/28/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: T06CM03998 4055 North Highway Dr. Pool Corp. - Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 28, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The site plan indicates two uses for the project site, Business Supply and Equipment Wholesaling and Commercial Storage. Please clarify if these are two separate uses (two separate businesses) or if the commercial storage supports the wholesaling as storage for the business. If the storage supports the wholesaling then remove all references to commercial storage in all land use, parking, and off-street loading calculations. All calculations will then be based on Business Supply and Equipment Wholesaling as the principal use. LUC 3.2.5.1 2. Based on the established area setback utilizing Gardner Lane as street frontage the required setback for a thirty-two (32) foot high structure is forty-eight (48) feet not fifty-four (54) feet. Please correct north perimeter yard required setback in the zoning requirements. LUC 3.2.6.5.A 3. Please revised the motor vehicle parking calculations if Business Supply and Equipment Wholesaling is the principal use. Required parking for this use is one (1) space per 2,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA) for the first 20,000 sq. ft. and one space for every 10,000 sq. ft. of GFA over 20,000, resulting in eleven (11) required motor vehicle parking spaces with thirteen (13) provided. Please revise if needed. LUC 3.3.4 4. Please revise the off-street loading parking calculations if Business Supply and Equipment Wholesaling is the principal use. Required loading spaces are based on Table 2, LUC Sec. 3.4.5.1. For total GFA of 28,600 sq. ft. two (2) spaces would be required with three (3) being provided. LUC 3.4.5 & LUC 3.4.5.1 5. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to the project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicle access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier. The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. Sidewalks will be a minimum of four (4) feet wide. Per this requirement Highway Drive would be required to meet this. DS 2-08.4.1.A & 2-08.5.1.A 6. Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development including the separate shed. Please provide. DS 2-08.4.1.D 7. Please indicate the cross slope on all sidewalks. Cross slopes will not exceed two (2) percent. DS 2-08.5.1.D 8. Please dimension the back-up spur. The spur must be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth and will have a three (3) foot radii. DS 3-05.2.2.D 9. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including the handicap access aisle. All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 10. For every six (6) accessible parking spaces, at least one (1) shall be van accessible. The one (1) accessible space provided on site must meet this requirement. The space must then provide an access aisle that is a minimum of eight (8) feet wide. IBC2003 Sec. 1106.5 & TDOT. 11. Signage for the accessible space must be posted at a minimum height of seven (7) feet, measured from the bottom of the sign to the sidewalk. TDOT 12. Development standard 2-09 has been revised. Class 2 bicycle parking will be clearly visible from the adjacent sidewalks, drives, and main entrance and provide lighting to fully illuminate during hours of work. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30 inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). Please be more specific as to the type of Class 1 bicycle parking to be provided. Provide a detail for Class 1 bike parking as demonstrated in DS 2-09 figure 1. Please review revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking on the site as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf DS 2-09.0 & DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 13. Please add the Section, township, and range (21-13-14) to the location map and shown the City limits boundary. 14. Please add a legal description of the property on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 15. Please provide on the site plan the location, type, size, and height of all proposed signage. If none exists then state so in response. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 16. Please show all easements of record on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. If none exists then state so in response. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 17. Please show on the site plan any existing and proposed lighting layout and type. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 18. Please add the existing use of the property to the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 19. Please fully dimension the refuse container location on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 20. Please provide the gross and net lot area. DS 2-02.2.2.A.1 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T06CM03998.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/29/2006 | SREEVES1 | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2006 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/08/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |