Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM03746
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/21/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPP plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0 |
| 07/21/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. If the expansion of development is less than 50%, the requirements of the LUC apply only to the proposed expansions. 2. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Include the following information on the landscape plan: 3. Points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (PAALs). Including the required and provided parking spaces. 4. Street names and dimensioned right-of-way. 5. Landscape hardscape materials such as planters and required curbing. 6. Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. 7. Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 8. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 9. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 10. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 11. The planting plan will include the locations, size, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place. 12. Plant selection for landscaping is from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 9-06.0. Some plants indicated on the landscape plan are not listed on the approved plant list. Choose appropriate plant material or provide oasis calculations outlined in DS 2-06.3.2. 13. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Indicate treatment for landscaped areas. 14. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 15. Submit NPP plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0 16. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/10/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: NTD STICHLER DATE: August 12, 2006 Architects 2940 N. Swan Road Ste 214 Tucson, Arizona 85712 SUBJECT: 1800 N. Camino Pio Decimo Site plan T06CM03743 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 05 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. This review was performed without the benefit of a full set of plans. Further comments may be forth coming. 3. This site may also be more than the 25% expansion limit in order to avoid full code compliance. Contact Michael St. Paul of the zoning department to clarify. 4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Additional comments may be forth coming. 8. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 9. Show Site plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1800 N. Camino Pio Decimo Site |
| 09/08/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: T06CM03746, 1800 N. Camino Pio Decimo, St. Pius X Catholic Church Garage addition and pedestrian circulation changes to church Site Plan Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 14, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was submitted without the last approved site plan, thus comparisons to what is currently on the site to what is proposed is difficult to clarify. Please provide a copy of the last approved site plan at 24x36. If a site plan is not found in our records section, please submit a statement that there were no records available. Staff reviewed the 3 plan view areas shown on page C1.1 and the overall site drawing on page A0-2, however, these comments may change depending upon what is shown on the last approved site plan. Based upon the plans provided, it is staff's understanding this project is not full code compliance, and therefore only the new development areas were reviewed for code compliance. The partial plans view provided should have a very clearly delineated line showing what is new. The codes applicable are: Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and International Building Code 2003 (IBC). SITE PLAN A 2. Per DS 2-02.2.16, with regards to the proposed garage: A) clarify building height (grade to top of flat roof, grade to midpoint of pitched roof) B) clarify if flat roof with parapets or ridge roof C) ensure general zoning notes state max building height is 12' for garage (see note A) D) Please dimension the building footprint. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7, with regards to building setbacks: A) provide building setbacks from north lot line B) provide building setbacks from nearest edge adjacent travel lane on Grady Street (lot bounded by a Major Street and Route, and Grady meets MSR. This site is considered a developing area for setback purposes. Show if parking lane on Grady. C) Per LUC 2.2.4., the minimum setback for a religious use structure in the SR zone adjacent to an R-1 (north) is 2 times the Height of exterior building wall. It is probable the garage does not meet setbacks at the north property line. Either move or obtain written permission of adjacent property owners to the north on the plan to allow the setback. It is also probable that the setback from the east side along Grady does not meet setbacks. Please see above comments and check. 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, with regards to parking: A) ensure wheel stop is contained entirely within top 2.5' of the parking space (detail) B) provide back up spur at south end of new parking lot C) demonstrate maneuverability to enter/exit parking spaces/lot near landscape at south D) ensure every parking space (check south near landscape) is 18' long 8.5' wide E) give wheel stops in all parking spaces to ensure sidewalks not compromised by cars 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, dimension all PAALs, ensure 24' wide minimum access 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12 /DS 2-08 with regards to pedestrian circulation A) is required to be continuous from garage to church, connect from Grady B) provide crosswalks across PAALs at 90 angles (bisecting) C) provide wheel chair access ramps at 1/12 slope max where crosswalks meet sidewalk D) provide truncated domes (early warning system per ANSI 705.5.) on all ramps E) provide notation that sidewalks are raised from asphalt F) provide sidewalk along west side of garage building to separate from PAAL G) provide sidewalk along between existing church building and PAAL H) provide width of sidewalk I) identify what is proposed along west side of garage, shaded area is? 7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.19, dimension Grady right of way with centerline, travel lane, parking 8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20, ensure any easements called out in this area of project 9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.25, clarify if any free-standing lighting and provide location and base width and height 10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.28, call out zoning of adjacent parcel to north 11. Per DS 2-02.2.1.32, demonstrate maneuverability of trash collection on plan 12. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.6, provide exact percentage of expansion calcs for both building and parking lot SITE PLAN B 13. Per DS 2-08, with pedestrian access: A) call out width of sidewalk B) call out where handicapped ramps/crosswalks may connect to sidewalk C) identify 4' barrier free accessible path D) call out the surfacing type in the area the sidewalk leads to (asphalt, concrete, dirt) E) call out any structures, fountains, or vegetation in this area F) is the proposed sidewalk obstructed by a curb? Label/clarify please SITE PLAN C 14. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, with regards to drop off area A) clarify width of drop off PAAL B) clarify why bollards, even removable, are provided C) clarify if concrete is in flush with sidewalk, provide separation if so D) clarify pedestrian access route, barrier free, from building to handicapped parking E) clarify where handicapped ramps on south side of drop off lead to - there are no ramps on other side - handicapped access in a PAAL is a safety issue F) provide width of crosswalk G) provide width of sidewalk H) provide slope ratio for ramp please I) provide truncated domes on all ramps J) if sidewalk in drop off is in flush with asphalt, provide physical barrier to prevent vehicles from entering up on sidewalk to building and provide truncated domes in a strip full length of pedestrian area that may touch the in flush asphalt or pavers where vehicles travel (detection for blind) K) call out width of handicapped access aisle between parking spaces L) call out where handicapped access aisles are for other two handicapped spaces - must be adjacent M) call out ramps at handicapped access aisle to sidewalk near parking spaces, crosswalk too 15. Depending upon what the last approved site plan shows, and the responses given to this review, further review comments may be forthcoming, or comments provided here may be deleted. Should you have any questions on this review, please email me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T06CM03746 1800 n camino pio decimo garage church.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/14/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/18/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |