Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: OTHER
Permit Number - T06CM03714
Review Name: OTHER
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2006 | MARTY DUPONT | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | Sheet x1.4 Detail #1 - The handrail extension at the bottom of stairs is required to be 12" plus the width of one tread. §4.9.4 & Fig. 19(c). Sheet a1.1 - There is no information or specification provided for the walk-off mats. Are the mats recessed or surface? Provide detailed information to comply with ADAAG Standard §4.5.2. Sheet a7.0 - Top of counter not dimensioned correctly. Top of sink rim is 34" a.f.f. §4.24. Sheet a7.2 1. Add the words "Clear" or "Finish to Finish" to the shower dimensions. 2. Enlarged Plan 1 & Elevation 2 add keynote #38 to bench. Dimension the bench elevation 17" to 19". §4.35.4 3. Note #31 call out for a full length mirror but it is not shown in the plan or elevations. §4.35.5 4. Tops of lavatories in the elevations are not dimensioned. 34" to top of rim §4.24 |
| 09/06/2006 | WILDAN | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | September 6, 2006 City of Tucson Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: REID PARK ZOO EDUCATIONAL CENTER – 1ST REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T06CM03714 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-6046 The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter second review, all corrections and revisions must be made on the original plans and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IBC, 1997 UAC, 2003 IMC, 2003 IECC, 2002 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 2003 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Terry Malone and Jim Fox. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms A-3 329 V-B 10,430 Yes Yes Special Inspection is required for the following items: Concrete and Shotcrete Construction Structural Masonry Construction Structural Steel Construction High Strength Bolts Welding Epoxy and expansion anchors The following items are acceptable for deferred submittals: Steel Trusses and joists GENERAL COMMENTS: General A signed special inspection form from the City of Tucson is required at the time that the plans are resubmitted for a back check. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy. A deferred submittal letter for steel trusses and joists will need to be forwarded to the Building Official and approved prior to the plans being delivered to the City. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy. Sheet G1.1 Please specify on the 2003 IBC Code Analysis that this building is built under non-separated use provisions, Section 302.3.1 of the IBC. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet A6.4 Detail 7: Please provide an additional note that the roof hatch detail is located at Detail 4 on Sheet A9.1. Reference IBC Section 106.1. Sheet A8.0 Please provide a hardware schedule on the plans to coordinate with the door schedule. Reference IBC Section 106.1. Signage Types – please provide height of the Braille portion of the signs in accordance with ADAAG Section 4.30.4. Sheet A8.1 Provide “T” tempered glass indications on all glass as shown on redlines on plan that meets the definition of hazardous locations as per IBC Section 2406.3. Sheet A9.1 Detail 8 (ship’s ladder): Show compliance with IMC Section 306.5, specifically Items 1 and 4. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: DRAWINGS Sheet S1.1 The importance factor for wind and seismic design does not match the calculations. Revise the notes. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sheet S1.5 ICF Wall Schedule: The typical wall vertical reinforcement does not match the calculations. The calculations require #4 @ 6 ¼” o.c. Revise the note. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Shear Wall Schedule: There are no hold-downs called out on the plans as noted in Note # 6; however, calculations call for hold-downs. Also, there are no details for the second floor shear wall hold-downs to the supporting beams. Provide the missing information and details. Reference IBC Sections 106.1.1 1 and 1603.1. Sheet S2.1 The architectural and structural plans show a rammed earth wall on the south entry area. Structural Section 119 shows the wall above the footing, but does not specify the connection of the wall to the footing. Clarify what the wall height is and how it is supported for stability. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Verify if there is a sump in the elevator pit. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Keynotes 6 and 12 appear to be redundant. Clarify. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Several diagonal bars appear to be missing per keynote 2. See the redlines. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sheet S3.1 Keynote 14 near the south entry appears to be pointing to nothing. Clarify intent. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Verify if the B22 stair stringer on the left hand side of the enlarged framing plan-stair #1 should extend to the south ICF wall. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sheet S3.2 Several sections are missing that are required to clearly define the framing. See the redlines. Provide the missing information. Reference IBC Sections 106.1.1 and 1603.1. Sheet S4.1 Section 115 and 117: PCI requires a ¼” fillet all around for the development strength of a #4 bar. Clarify if the 3/16” weld is satisfactory. Reference IBC Section 1604.4. Sections 114, 115, 111, 116 and 117: The minimum size of the fillet weld for the column to base plate does not comply with AISC Table J2.4. Revise the weld size. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 113: Provide a bar size for the footing reinforcement. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 119 See previous Comment No.1 for Sheet S2.1. Provide a hook for the right hand side vertical dowel under the rammed earth stem wall. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sheet S5.1 Section 203: The weld symbol for the weld of the tube steel blocking to the steel beam is not pointing to the right place. Correct the detail. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sections 212 and 215: Provide a minimum lap of the angle to the shear plate, or call out a minimum weld length. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 217: Verify that the weld of the shear tab to the channel is one side only. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sections 206, 216, and 217: Verify that there will be no spalling issues with the expansion bolts near the slab edge, or provide a minimum edge distance. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sheet S 5.2 Section 223: Provide a weld size for the fillet weld symbol on the left hand side of the detail. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 225: The fillet weld size for the horizontal plate at the bottom edge of the coped beam does not comply with AISC Table J2.4. Revise the weld size. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sections 227/S5.2 and 241/S5.3: Provide calculations for the top of the first floor ICF wall to span horizontally between supports. Reference ASCE Section 9.5.2.6.2.8. Section 229. Verify that the masonry wall is connected to the steel beam. The section is drawn with a 1” clear gap. The wall is to be designed to span horizontally if a gap exists. Reference ASCE Section 9.5.2.6.2.8. Section 232: Provide a size for the plate over the beam. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 233 and 236: The fillet weld size for the beam stiffeners to the beam does not comply with AISC Table J2.4. Revise the weld size. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 235: The fillet weld size for the dowels to the steel beam is not in accordance with PCI standards. Section 236: Verify if a stiffener plate is required at the upper beam bearing location. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1 and redlines. Sheet S5.3 Section 242 and 243: Provide information regarding the spacing of the embed plates. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 253: Provide weld sizes for the weld symbols. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 254: Provide a weld size for the dowel to the angle. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Sheet S5.4 Section 305: Clarify if the depth of the continuous steel stud on top of the wall track is to match the depth of the studs or the depth of the joists. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 311: Provide a note that the grout pad is to fill the void under the ¼” bent plate for full bearing. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 314: Provide weld sizes for the weld symbols. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 316: Check the weld size requirements for the column to bearing plate and rebar dowels to bearing plate. Reference AISC Tables J2.4 and PCI. Sheet S5.5 Section 402: Expansion bolts are not allowed in masonry per the general notes. Revise the section. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 405: The left hand arrow of the weld symbol is pointing to the wrong location. Revise the detail. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Section 406: There are two weld symbols without a weld size called out. Provide a weld size. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Calculations FB7 Sheet 23 and 49: The hand calculations show loads that imply that a concrete topping is applied to the beam. The plans show no topping but calls out for the beam to have WHS. Clarify. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. FB16 Sheet 31 and 68: The hand calculations and schedule implies that the beam is a composite beam. However, the computer output and plans show no topping. Clarify. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. FB17 Sheet 32 and 69: Sheet 32 and the plan show a W18x40 is to be used. The computer output shows a W14x48. Clarify which one is to be used. Also verify that a total load deflection of L/394 is satisfactory to support a concrete wall. Revise the calculations. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Lateral analysis: Sheet 125: The building has plywood shear walls (R=6.5), ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls (R=4.0), and intermediate reinforced masonry shear walls (R=3.5) as part of the lateral force resisting system, per ASCE Table 9.5.2.2. An R factor=4.5 was used from IBC Table 1617.6.2. That table is for use in the simplified lateral analysis method only. ASCE 9.5.2.2.2.1 requires that the lowest R factor is to be used. Therefore, R=3.5. Revise the calculations. Reference IBC Section 1604.4. The simplified wind analysis was used for the lateral design. The building does not comply with the conditions outlined in Section 1609.6.1.1, Item 5. Revise the calculations. Sheet 127: The allowable shear value for the plywood shear walls is incorrect. The shear walls on line 2C and 2D must be designed as a type I shear wall, designed for force transfer around the openings, or as type II shear wall per IBC 2211.2 and 2211.3 respectively. The aspect ratio for the wall on Line 2C exceed the allowable listed in the tables. All of the reductions listed in footnote “a.” of the tables and in 2211.2.2(5), 2211.3.1(2) and 2211.3.2(3) must be used. Revise the calculations. Reference IBC Section 1604.4. Sheet 128: See previous comment about missing hold-downs on the plan. Provide out-of-plane connection calculations. Note, that since most of the beam to wall connections are shown to be slip joint oriented, strap or dowel type connections should be considered. Where out-of plane fixity is provided at the beams, the wall must also be design to span horizontally when the connections exceed 4 foot on center spacings. Reference ASCE Sections 9.5.2.6.2.8 and 9.5.2.6.3.2. Provide calculations for all drag struts, chords, collectors and their connections at splices and at their connection to the lateral resisting elements. Provide calculations for force transfer across diaphragm discontinuities. Reference ASCE Sections 9.5.2.6.3.1, 9.5.2.6.2.7 and IBC Section 2305.1.2. Provide calculations for the site walls shown on Sheets T35 and S1.3. Reference IBC Section 1604.4. PLUMBING COMMENTS: See City comments. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: See City comments. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: See City comments. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Please provide a signed COM check certification for the Building Envelope, Electrical Lighting and Mechanical Systems. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. Sincerely, WILLDAN Martin Haeberle, C.B.O. Building Official MAH/tb |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2006 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/11/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |