Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T06CM03714
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/26/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/27/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a pressure regulator for the reclaimed water system to limit the pressure to 80 PSI or less. Reference Sections 310.4 and 608.2, UPC 2003. 2. The use of the oil-smart switch for the elevator sump pump will require an approved appeal from the building official. Reference Section 301.2, UPC 2003. 3. Clarify the missing portion of detail 1/P2.2 (relating to the sump pump discharge). Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 4. The fixture connection schedule shows two P-7 fixtures but only one P-7 is shown on the drawing, in the mechanical room, 206. Where is the other P-7? 5. Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out on sheet P1.1. Reference Sections 103.2.3 and 707.6, UPC 2003. 6. Provide justification for the combination waste and vent system located in room 107. Reference Section 910.1, UPC 2003. 7. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Show that overflow protection is provided for the roof. Reference Section 1106.0, UPC 2003. |
| 06/27/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/28/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the equipment on the second floor. Reference Section 307.2, IMC 2003 and Section 807.2, UPC 2003. |
| 07/10/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning will review the building plans once the site plan has been approved. |
| 07/11/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | An approved site plan is required prior to building plan approval. |
| 07/17/2006 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Keynote 7 on Sheet es0.1 and Keynote 10 on Sheet es0.2 appear to refer to the same conduit run. However, Keynote 7 identifies 750 MCM conductor and Keynote 10 identifies a 450 MCM conductor. Please clarify/correct as necessary. Otherwise disregard. 2. On Sheet E1.1, Ckt L1-20,22, the receptacles on Ckt 20 are identified at their respective locations as being powered by Ckt 24. Please clarify. 3. Please address disconnecting means for EF-1 through EF-6, and for the RCP in Room 206. 4. On Sheet E1.1, it appears that the circuit designation DP-25,27,29 is intended to read: "DP-1,3,5." 5. Water Heater is specified on Sheet P3.1 for 240V. Power provided is 208V. Please coordinate with Plumbing and clarify. 6. HP-1 and HP-2, on Ckt DP1-18,10 each have MOCP of 15A per Schedule on Sheet M5.1. Please specify that their respective disconnects be fused (Specifications for combination controllers call for them to be fused as indicated, 16482, 2.5 B). Global comment for all others which may apply (HP-3,4, & 5, same Sheet E1.1). 7. Sheet E1.2 a note calls for the HP units to be on a 20AF, typical. MOCP is 15A. 8. Please provide a circuit for the AC-2 FCU. Sheet E1.2, Communications Rm 205. 9. On Sheet E1.3, please correct the circuit designation for HP-4 from DP1-10,12 to read "DP1-13,15." 10. On Panel Schedule DP1, HP-4,5,6,7,8,9, & 11 are listed at a lower rating than on the Split-System Heat Pump Unit Schedule. Please coordinate with Mechanical and adjust panel loading as necessary. 11. Please provide overload protection for the Existing Mill Pond Recirc. Pump. Reference NEC 430.32. If the motor is already protected by an integral OL device, or is not a Continuous-Duty motor, disregard. 12. On Sheet ES0.2, Keynote 2, denoting "existing feeder between zoo school and distribution switchboard," also goes to the existing service on the demo plan. If Panel A is powered from the existing service, please add it to the line diagram and load calculations. Otherwise, clarify the feeder routing on the plans. 13. Please plot the location of Transformer T-2. Electrical Plans Examiner to evaluate per NEC 240.21 on subsequent review. 14. Keynote 1, Sheet ES0.1 calls for a new 225A CB, at the existing service, for the new building. One Line Diagram shows a 300A CB. Please clarify. 15. 200A Feeder for Panel is inadequate for the calculated demand load of 209A on Phase A. Also note that the KVA figures for Phases A and B were slightly understated on the subfeed from Panel L2, which would contribute to an even higher value for the loading on Panel DP. And consider the multiplier of 1.25 for the largest motor if this has not already been rolled into this calculation. 16. AFC at Elevator disconnect is 1614A on the SLD and 4618 according to the calculations. Plans Examiner calculated this figure to be 8192, with only 13 feet from Panel DP to the Elevator. Not an immediate Code issue, esp, since the specifications call for current-limiting fuses, but the Engineer may care to clarify this at his discretion. 17. Please note that the Structural Plans Examiner has been given notice to verify that the weight of the 112.5 KVA Transformer installed in Room 204 has been accounted for in Structural calculations. If this has been coordinated, disregard. 18. For all lighting poles greater than 20' in height, detail and calculations for pole and foundation shall be prepared and sealed by a Registered Structural Engineer. 19. No elevator motor near bikes. Circuits provided just for sump and its control, pit light and receptacle. 20. This is not a Code issue, but please note that BP provides conductor and MC connectors for inter-module connections, and USE-2 Extension cable to go from the end module(s) to the row boxes. Depending on availability, this may be faster and less expensive than the XHHW-2 in conduit. 21. The panels which are in the strings of 4 and 5 will produce voltages below the Minimum DC input for the Sunny Boy 6000U. 22. Provide more detail on the photovoltaic equipment to be installed in Room 206, such that it is possible to evaluate all proper clearances per NEC 110.26 and the Manufacturer's instruction to maintain an 8" air circulation clearance around the Sunny Boy. Reference Installation Guide, p. 3-3, Dimensions and Recommended Clearances. 23. Show the location of Panel PV. 24. The 30A MCBs on Panels PV and DP, and the #10 conductor from Panel PV to Panel DP are undersized for the output circuit current from the three Inverters. Reference NEC 690.8 (A) (3). 25. Provide overcurrent protection in the Photovoltaic Source Circuits from the panels to the inverters. Reference NEC 690.9 (A). 26. Location of the disconnecting means for the photovoltaic systems does not meet the requirements of NEC 690.14 (C) (1). 27. Specify the signing required by NEC 690.17. Provide the EXACT WORDING on the plans. 28. Size the Grounding Electrode Conductor for the DC system according to the requirements of NEC 250.169. Minimum size is #8 CU. Reference NEC 690.47 (B). This can be accomplished by resizing the #10 CU GND between the Inverter and the SES, in which case the conductor will serve as both DC Grounding Electrode Conductor and AC Equipment Grounding Conductor. Note that this conductor has to be unspliced as it runs through its respective enclosures, per 250.62 (C). 29. At the PV Disconnects, specify the marking required by NEC 690.53. Provide the EXACT WORDING on the plans. 30. At the Panel DP, specify the marking required by NEC 690.54. Provide the EXACT WORDING on the plans. 31. At both the PV Disconnects and the SES, specify the plaques required by NEC 690.56 (B). Provide the EXACT WORDING on the plans. 32. It appears that the interconnection of the 30A Inverter CB to the 250A bus at Panel DP violates the requirements of NEC 690.64 (B) (2). |
| 07/18/2006 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 07/19/2006 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | DEQ requirements- appears graywater discharger is over 400 GPD & not residential- therefore a Type 3 general permit is required as issued by ADEQ- see attached. WW cannot drain elevator pit to sewer. needs wastewater 8th floor credit evaluation if applicable. |
| 07/25/2006 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2006 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |